Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Osteoporosis International
Published in: Osteoporosis International 5/2020

01-05-2020 | Care | Review

Secondary prevention of fragility fractures in Asia Pacific: an educational initiative

Authors: P.R. Ebeling, D.-C. Chan, T.C. Lau, J.K. Lee, T. Songpatanasilp, S.H. Wong, F.L. Hew, R. Sethi, M. Williams

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

The Asia -Pacific Bone Academy (APBA) Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) Focus Group educational initiative has stimulated activity across the Asia -Pacific region with the intention of supporting widespread implementation of new FLS. In 2017, the APBA FLS Focus Group developed a suite of tools to support implementation of FLS across the Asia-Pacific region as a component of a multi-faceted educational initiative. This article puts this initiative into context with a narrative review describing the burden of fragility fractures in the region, the current secondary fracture prevention care gap and a summary of emerging best practice. The results of a survey to evaluate the impact of the APBA educational initiative is presented, in addition to commentary on recent activities intended to improve the care of individuals who sustain fragility fractures across the Asia -Pacific. A FLS Toolbox for Asia-Pacific was developed which included the following sections:
1. The burden of fragility fractures in the Asia-Pacific region.
2. A summary of evidence for FLS in the Asia-Pacific.
3. A generic, fully referenced FLS business plan template.
4. Potential cost savings accrued by each country, based on a country-specific FLS Benefits Calculator.
5. How to start and expand FLS programmes in the Asia-Pacific context.
6. A step-by-step guide to setting up FLS in countries in the Asia-Pacific region.
7. Other practical tools to support FLS establishment.
8. FLS online resources and publications.
The FLS Toolbox was provided as a resource to support FLS workshops immediately following the 5th Scientific Meeting of the Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies (AFOS) held in Kuala Lumpur in October 2017. The FLS workshops addressed three key themes:
• The FLS business case.
• Planning the FLS patient pathway.
• The role of the FLS coordinator in fragility fracture care management.
A follow-up survey of 142 FLS workshop participants was conducted in August–September 2018. The survey included questions regarding how FLS were developed, funded, the scope of service provision and the support provided by the educational initiative. Almost one-third (30.3%) of FLS workshop participants completed the survey. Survey responses were reported for those who had established a FLS at the time the survey was conducted and, separately, for those who had not established a FLS. Findings for those who had established a FLS included:
• 78.3% of respondents established a multidisciplinary team to develop the business case for their FLS.
• 87.0% of respondents stated that a multidisciplinary team was established to design the patient pathway for their FLS.
• 26.1% of respondents stated that their FLS has sustainable funding.
• The primary source of funding for FLS was from public hospitals (83.3%) as compared with private hospitals (16.7%).
Most hospitals that had not established a FLS at the time the survey was conducted were either in the process of setting-up a FLS (47%) or had plans in place to establish a FLS for which approval is being sought (29%). The primary barrier to establishing a new FLS was lack of sustainable funding. The APBA FLS Focus Group educational initiative has stimulated activity across the Asia-Pacific region with the intention of supporting widespread implementation of new FLS. A second edition of the FLS Toolbox is in development which is intended to complement ongoing efforts throughout the region to expedite widespread implementation of FLS.
Literature
1.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division (2017) World population prospects: the 2017 revision, key findings and advance tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.248. New York
2.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2017). World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. ESA/P/WP/248
3.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division (2017) World population prospects: volume II: demographic profiles 2017 Revision. New York
4.
Ebeling PR (2014) Osteoporosis in men: Why change needs to happen. In: Mitchell PJ (ed) World osteoporosis day thematic report. International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon
5.
6.
Cheung CL, Ang SB, Chadha M, Chow ES, Chung YS, Hew FL, Jaisamrarn U, Ng H, Takeuchi Y, Wu CH, Xia W, Yu J, Fujiwara S (2018) An updated hip fracture projection in Asia: the Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies study. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 4:16–21PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Wang Y, Cui H, Zhang D, Zhang P (2018) Hospitalisation cost analysis on hip fracture in China: a multicentre study among 73 tertiary hospitals. BMJ Open 8:e019147PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
International Osteoporosis Foundation (2013) The Asia-Pacific regional audit: epidemiology, costs and burden of osteoporosis in 2013. Nyon, Switzerland
9.
International Osteoporosis Foundation (2011) The Eastern European & Central Asian regional audit: epidemiology, costs & burden of osteoporosis in 2010
10.
International Osteoporosis Foundation (2011) The Middle East & Africa regional audit: epidemiology, costs & burden of osteoporosis in 2011
11.
Cooper C, Ferrari S (2017) IOF compendium of osteoporosis. In: Mitchell P, Harvey N, Dennison E (eds) , 1st edn. International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyons
12.
Watts JJ, Abimanyi-Ochom J, Sanders KM (2013) Osteoporosis costing all Australians a new burden of disease analysis—2012 to 2022. Osteoporosis Australia, Glebe
13.
Jones S, Blake S, Hamblin R, Petagna C, Shuker C, Merry AF (2016) Reducing harm from falls. N Z Med J 129:89–103PubMed
14.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division (2017) World population prospects 2017: File POP/15-2: annual male population by five-year age group, region, subregion and country, 1950-2100 (thousands). New York
15.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division (2017) World population prospects 2017: File POP/15-3: annual female population by five-year age group, region, subregion and country, 1950-2100 (thousands). New York
16.
Lesnyak O, Sahakyan S, Zakroyeva A et al (2017) Epidemiology of fractures in Armenia: development of a country-specific FRAX model and comparison to its surrogate. Arch Osteoporos 12:98PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Ebadi Fard Azar AA, Rezapour A, Alipour V, Sarabi-Asiabar A, Gray S, Mobinizadeh M, Yousefvand M, Arabloo J (2017) Cost-effectiveness of teriparatide compared with alendronate and risedronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis patients in Iran. Med J Islam Repub Iran 31:39PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Maalouf G, Bachour F, Hlais S, Maalouf NM, Yazbeck P, Yaghi Y, Yaghi K, El Hage R, Issa M (2013) Epidemiology of hip fractures in Lebanon: a nationwide survey. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:675–680PubMed
19.
Sadat-Ali M, Al-Dakheel DA, Azam MQ et al (2015) Reassessment of osteoporosis-related femoral fractures and economic burden in Saudi Arabia. Arch Osteoporos 10:37PubMed
20.
Tuzun S, Eskiyurt N, Akarirmak U, Saridogan M, Senocak M, Johansson H, Kanis JA, Turkish osteoporosis S (2012) Incidence of hip fracture and prevalence of osteoporosis in Turkey: the FRACTURK study. Osteoporos Int 23:949–955PubMed
21.
Akesson K, Mitchell PJ (2012) Capture the fracture: a global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. In: Stenmark J, Misteli L (eds) World Osteoporosis Day Thematic Report. International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon
22.
23.
Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA 3rd, Berger M (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739PubMed
24.
Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35:375–382PubMed
25.
Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Sernbo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Petterson C, De Laet C, Jonsson B (2004) Fracture risk following an osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:175–179PubMed
26.
Gallagher JC, Melton LJ, Riggs BL, Bergstrath E (1980) Epidemiology of fractures of the proximal femur in Rochester, Minnesota. Clin Orthop Relat Res 163-171
27.
Port L, Center J, Briffa NK, Nguyen T, Cumming R, Eisman J (2003) Osteoporotic fracture: missed opportunity for intervention. Osteoporos Int 14:780–784PubMed
28.
McLellan A, Reid D, Forbes K, Reid R, Campbell C, Gregori A, Raby N, Simpson A (2004) Effectiveness of strategies for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in Scotland (CEPS 99/03). NHS Quality Improvement Scotland
29.
Edwards BJ, Bunta AD, Simonelli C, Bolander M, Fitzpatrick LA (2007) Prior fractures are common in patients with subsequent hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 461:226–230PubMed
30.
Harvey NC, McCloskey EV, Mitchell PJ, Dawson-Hughes B, Pierroz DD, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R, Cooper C, Kanis JA (2017) Mind the (treatment) gap: a global perspective on current and future strategies for prevention of fragility fractures. Osteoporos Int 28:1507–1529PubMedPubMedCentral
31.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2018) Bisphosphonates for treating osteoporosis: Technology appraisal guidance [TA464]. London
32.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2018) Raloxifene and teriparatide for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women: Technology appraisal guidance [TA161]. London
33.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2010) Denosumab for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women: Technology appraisal guidance [TA204]. London
34.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2017) Osteoporosis: assessing the risk of fragility fracture: Clinical guideline [CG146]. London
35.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2017) Hip fracture: management: clinical guideline [CG124]. Lonson
36.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2017) Quality Standard 149: osteoporosis. London
37.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2012) Quality standard for hip fracture care. NICE Quality Standard 16. London
38.
The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Osteoporosis Australia (2017) Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and management in postmenopausal women and men over 50 years of age 2nd edition. RACGP, East Melbourne VIC
39.
Chinese Society of Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Research, Chinese Medical Association, (in collaboration with) Department of Medical Administration of the Ministry of Health (2013) The standard of diagnosis, treatment and quality control on osteoporosis. Chinese Society of Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Research
40.
Oshk Task Group for Formulation of OSHK Guideline for Clinical Management of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis in Hong Kong, Ip TP, Cheung SK et al (2013) The Osteoporosis Society of Hong Kong (OSHK): 2013 OSHK guideline for clinical management of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 19 Suppl 2:1–40
41.
Meeta HC, Marwah R, Sahay R, Kalra S, Babhulkar S (2013) Clinical practice guidelines on postmenopausal osteoporosis: *an executive summary and recommendations. Journal of Mid-life Health 4:107–126PubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Setyohadi B, Hutagalung EUHU, Frederik Adam JM et al (2014) Summary of the Indonesian guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. 27
43.
Orimo H, Nakamura T, Hosoi T, Iki M, Uenishi K, Endo N, Ohta H, Shiraki M, Sugimoto T, Suzuki T, Soen S, Nishizawa Y, Hagino H, Fukunaga M, Fujiwara S (2012) Japanese 2011 guidelines for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis—executive summary. Arch Osteoporos 7:3–20PubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Yeap SS, Hew FL, Damodaran P, Chee W, Lee JK, Goh EML, Mumtaz M, Lim HH, Chan SP (2016) A summary of the Malaysian Clinical Guidance on the management of postmenopausal and male osteoporosis, 2015. Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2(1):1–12
45.
Gilchrist N, Reid IR, Sankaran S, Kim D, Drewry A, Toop L, McClure F (2017) Guidance on the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in New Zealand. Osteoporosis New Zealand, Wellington
46.
Li-Yu J, Perez EC, Canete A, Bonifacio L, Llamado LQ, Martinez R, Lanzon A, Sison M, Osteoporosis Society of Philippines Foundation I, Philippine Orthopedic Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Task Force Committee on O (2011) Consensus statements on osteoporosis diagnosis, prevention, and management in the Philippines. Int J Rheum Dis 14:223–238PubMed
47.
48.
Hwang JS, Chan DC, Chen JF, Cheng TT, Wu CH, Soong YK, Tsai KS, Yang RS (2014) Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in Taiwan: summary. J Bone Miner Metab 32:10–16PubMed
49.
Songpatanasilp T, Sritara C, Kittisomprayoonkul W et al (2016) Thai Osteoporosis Foundation (TOPF) position statements on management of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2:191–207PubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Vietnam Rheumatology Association (2012) Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatments of common rheumatic diseases. Viet Nam Education Publishing House, Hanoi, pp 247–258
51.
Australian and New Zealand Bone and Mineral Society (2016) Secondary fracture prevention program initiative: resource 1—secondary fracture prevention program resource pack. Australian and New Zealand Bone and Mineral Society, Sydney
52.
Wang O, Hu Y, Gong S et al (2015) A survey of outcomes and management of patients post fragility fractures in China. Osteoporos Int 26:2631–2640PubMed
53.
Tian M, Gong X, Rath S, Wei J, Yan LL, Lamb SE, Lindley RI, Sherrington C, Willett K, Norton R (2016) Management of hip fractures in older people in Beijing: a retrospective audit and comparison with evidence-based guidelines and practice in the UK. Osteoporos Int 27:677–681PubMed
54.
Leung KS, Yuen WF, Ngai WK, Lam CY, Lau TW, Lee KB, Siu KM, Tang N, Wong SH, Cheung WH (2017) How well are we managing fragility hip fractures? A narrative report on the review with the attempt to setup a Fragility Fracture Registry in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 23:264–271PubMed
55.
Rath S, Yadav L, Tewari A et al (2017) Management of older adults with hip fractures in India: a mixed methods study of current practice, barriers and facilitators, with recommendations to improve care pathways. Arch Osteoporos 12:55PubMedPubMedCentral
56.
Hagino H, Sawaguchi T, Endo N, Ito Y, Nakano T, Watanabe Y (2012) The risk of a second hip fracture in patients after their first hip fracture. Calcif Tissue Int 90:14–21PubMed
57.
Baba T, Hagino H, Nonomiya H, Ikuta T, Shoda E, Mogami A, Sawaguchi T, Kaneko K (2015) Inadequate management for secondary fracture prevention in patients with distal radius fracture by trauma surgeons. Osteoporos Int 26:1959–1963PubMed
58.
Iba K, Dohke T, Takada J, Sasaki K, Sonoda T, Hanaka M, Miyano S, Yamashita T (2017) Improvement in the rate of inadequate pharmaceutical treatment by orthopaedic surgeons for the prevention of a second fracture over the last 10 years. J Orthop Sci
59.
Yeap SS, Nur Fazirah MFR, Nur Aisyah C, Zahari Sham SY, Samsudin IN, Subashini CT, Hew FL, Lim BP, Siow YS, Chan SP (2017) Trends in post osteoporotic hip fracture care from 2010 to 2014 in a private hospital in Malaysia 3(2):112–116
60.
Braatvedt G, Wilkinson S, Scott M, Mitchell P, Harris R (2017) Fragility fractures at Auckland City Hospital: we can do better. Arch Osteoporos 12:64PubMed
61.
Kim SR, Park YG, Kang SY, Nam KW, Park YG, Ha YC (2014) Undertreatment of osteoporosis following hip fractures in jeju cohort study. J Bone Metab 21:263–268PubMedPubMedCentral
62.
Kim SC, Kim MS, Sanfelix-Gimeno G et al (2015) Use of osteoporosis medications after hospitalization for hip fracture: a cross-national study. Am J Med 128:519–526 e511PubMedPubMedCentral
63.
Yu YM, Lee JY, Lee E (2017) Access to Anti-osteoporosis Medication after Hip Fracture in Korean Elderly Patients. Maturitas 103:54–59PubMed
64.
Jung Y, Ko Y, Kim HY, Ha YC, Lee YK, Kim TY, Choo DS, Jang S (2019) Gender differences in anti-osteoporosis drug treatment after osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Metab 37:134–141PubMed
65.
Angthong C, Rodjanawijitkul S, Samart S, Angthong W (2013) Prevalence of bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis management following low- and high-energy fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 47:318–322PubMed
66.
67.
Kung AW, Fan T, Xu L et al (2013) Factors influencing diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture among postmenopausal women in Asian countries: a retrospective study. BMC Womens Health 13:7PubMedPubMedCentral
68.
Osteoporosis New Zealand (2012) Bone Care 2020: a systematic approach to hip fracture care and prevention for New Zealand. Wellington
69.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2011) Hip fracture: the management of hip fracture in adults. NICE Clinical Guideline 124
70.
Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (ANZHFR) Steering Group (2014) Australian and New Zealand Guideline for Hip Fracture Care: improving outcomes in hip fracture management of adults. Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry Steering Group, Sydney
71.
McLellan AR, Gallacher SJ, Fraser M, McQuillian C (2003) The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 14:1028–1034PubMed
72.
Dreinhofer KE, Mitchell PJ, Begue T et al (2018) A global call to action to improve the care of people with fragility fractures. Injury
73.
74.
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Health Quality & Safety Commission New Zealand (2016) Hip fracture care clinical care standard. Sydney
75.
Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (2016) 2016 Annual Report. Sydney
76.
Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (2017) Annual Report 2017. Sydney
77.
Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (2018) Annual Report 2018. Sydney
78.
Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (2018) ANZ Hip Fracture Registry newsletter September 2018. 24 edn. Sydney
79.
80.
British Orthopaedic Association, British Geriatrics Society, healthcare quality improvement partnership (2012) The National Hip Fracture Database: National Report 2012
81.
British Orthopaedic Association, British Geriatrics Society (2007) The care of patients with fragility fracture. 2nd edn
82.
Cheung WH, Shen WY, Dai DL, Lee KB, Zhu TY, Wong RM, Leung KS (2017) Evaluation of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme for elderly patients with hip fracture: a prospective cohort study. J Rehabil Med
83.
Yamamoto N, Takhashi HE, Endo N (2018) The challenge of secondary prevention of hip fracture in Japan. In: Seibel MJ, Mitchell PJ (eds) Secondary fracture prevention: an international perspective. Elsevier, Chennai
84.
85.
Doshi HK, Ramason R, Azellarasi J, Naidu G, Chan WL (2014) Orthogeriatric model for hip fracture patients in Singapore: our early experience and initial outcomes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:351–357PubMed
86.
Mitchell PJ, Ganda K, Seibel MJ (2015) Australian and New Zealand Bone and Mineral Society Position Paper on Secondary Fracture Prevention Programs. Sydney
87.
Australian and New Zealand Bone and Mineral Society (2016) Secondary fracture prevention program initiative: resource 2—analysis of Australian secondary fracture prevention programs using Ganda’s classification system. Australian and New Zealand Bone and Mineral Society, Sydney
88.
Yates CJ, Chauchard MA, Liew D, Bucknill A, Wark JD (2015) Bridging the osteoporosis treatment gap: performance and cost-effectiveness of a fracture liaison service. J Clin Densitom 18:150–156PubMed
89.
Bliuc D, Eisman JA, Center JR (2006) A randomized study of two different information-based interventions on the management of osteoporosis in minimal and moderate trauma fractures. Osteoporos Int 17:1309–1317PubMed
90.
Kuo I, Ong C, Simmons L, Bliuc D, Eisman J, Center J (2007) Successful direct intervention for osteoporosis in patients with minimal trauma fractures. Osteoporos Int 18:1633–1639PubMed
91.
Inderjeeth CA, Glennon DA, Poland KE, Ingram KV, Prince RL, Van VR, Holman CD (2010) A multimodal intervention to improve fragility fracture management in patients presenting to emergency departments. Med J Aust 193:149–153PubMed
92.
Lih A, Nandapalan H, Kim M, Yap C, Lee P, Ganda K, Seibel MJ (2011) Targeted intervention reduces refracture rates in patients with incident non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures: a 4-year prospective controlled study. Osteoporos Int 22:849–858PubMed
93.
Van der Kallen J, Giles M, Cooper K, Gill K, Parker V, Tembo A, Major G, Ross L, Carter J (2014) A fracture prevention service reduces further fractures two years after incident minimal trauma fracture. Int J Rheum Dis 17:195–203PubMed
94.
Ganda K, Puech M, Chen JS, Speerin R, Bleasel J, Center JR, Eisman JA, March L, Seibel MJ (2013) Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 24:393–406PubMed
95.
Kim D, Mackenzie D, Cutfield R (2016) Implementation of fracture liaison service in a New Zealand public hospital: Waitemata district health board experience. N Z Med J 129:50–55PubMed
96.
Osteoporosis New Zealand (2016) Clinical standards for fracture Liaison Services in New Zealand. Osteoporosis New Zealand, Wellington
97.
Akesson K, Marsh D, Mitchell PJ, McLellan AR, Stenmark J, Pierroz DD, Kyer C, Cooper C, Group IOFFW (2013) Capture the Fracture: a Best Practice Framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. Osteoporos Int 24:2135–2152PubMedPubMedCentral
98.
Wu X, Tian M, Zhang J et al (2019) The effect of a multidisciplinary co-management program for the older hip fracture patients in Beijing: a “pre- and post-” retrospective study. Arch Osteoporos 14:43PubMed
99.
Suzuki N, Arai K, Kon S et al (2016) Challenges to prevent secondary fractures in patients with hip fractures in Joetsu Myoko, Japan through the increased use of osteoporosis treatment and collaboration with family doctors. J Bone Miner Metab
100.
Chandran M, Tan MZ, Cheen M, Tan SB, Leong M, Lau TC (2013) Secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures—an “OPTIMAL” model of care from Singapore. Osteoporos Int 24:2809–2817PubMed
101.
Chandran M, Cheen M, Ying H, Lau TC, Tan M (2016) Dropping the ball and falling off the care wagon. Factors correlating with nonadherence to secondary fracture prevention programs. J Clin Densitom 19:117–124PubMed
102.
Chang L-Y, Tsai K-S, Peng J-K et al (2018) The development of Taiwan Fracture Liaison Service network. Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia
103.
104.
105.
Chao CT, Yang RS, Huang WJ, Tsai KS, Chan DD (2019) Risk factors for poor functional recovery, mortality, recurrent fractures, and falls among patients participating in a Fracture Liaison service program. J Am Med Dir Assoc
106.
Amphansap T, Stitkitti N, Dumrongwanich P (2016) Evaluation of police general hospital’s fracture liaison service (PGH's FLS): the first study of a fracture liaison service in Thailand. Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2:238–243PubMedPubMedCentral
107.
Chan DD, Chang LY, Akesson KE et al (2018) Consensus on best practice standards for Fracture Liaison Service in the Asia-Pacific region. Arch Osteoporos 13:59PubMed
108.
Australian Government (2017) National Health Priority Areas. In Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (ed)Canberra
109.
110.
National Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Conditions Advisory Group (2005) A National action plan for osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra
111.
National Health Priority Action Council (2006) National service improvement framework for osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra
112.
NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation (2017) Model of care for osteoporotic refracture prevention, 2nd edn. NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation, Chatswood
113.
NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation (2018) Musculoskeletal Network NSW Osteoporotic Refracture Prevention Service Directory May 2018. NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation, Chatswood
114.
Tam RSM (2018) Early FLS Experience in HK. 19th Regional Osteoporosis Conference. The Osteoporosis Society of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Conventon and Exhibition Centre
115.
Mitchell P, Akesson K (2018) How to prevent the next fracture. Injury
116.
117.
118.
119.
120.
121.
Ebeling P, Chan D, Lau TC, Lee JK, Songpatanasilp T, Wong SH, Yim TK, Hew FL, Suzuki A, Amphansap T (2017) Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) Toolbox. Asia Pacific Bone Academy, Hong Kong
122.
123.
Dell RM, Greene D, Anderson D, Williams K (2009) Osteoporosis disease management: What every orthopaedic surgeon should know. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 Suppl 6:79–86PubMed
124.
125.
Ebeling P, Chan D, Lee JK, Songpatanasilp T, Wong SH, Hew FL, Williams M (2018) Asia-Pacific bone academy fracture liaison service educational initiative. IOF Regional – 7th Asia-Pacific Osteoporosis ConferenceICC Sydney, Australia
126.
Asia Pacific Bone Academy (2018) Emerging strategies in osteoporosis care. Grand Hyatt Taipei, Taipei, Taiwan
127.
The FFN Asia-Pacific Regional Expert Meeting. Fukutake Hall, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
128.
IOF Regional – 7th Asia-Pacific Osteoporosis Conference. ICC Sydney, Australia
129.
130.
Metadata
Title
Secondary prevention of fragility fractures in Asia Pacific: an educational initiative
Authors
P.R. Ebeling
D.-C. Chan
T.C. Lau
J.K. Lee
T. Songpatanasilp
S.H. Wong
F.L. Hew
R. Sethi
M. Williams
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-019-05197-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Osteoporosis International 5/2020 Go to the issue

Case Report

No longer a historical ailment: two cases of childhood scurvy with recommendations for bone health providers

Original Article

Comparison of multimedia and printed patient education tools for patients with osteoporosis: a 6-month randomized controlled trial

Original Article

Association between a literature-based genetic risk score and bone mineral density of African American women in Women Health Initiative Study

Original Article

Risk for hip fracture before and after total knee replacement in Sweden

Original Article

A fall in the previous 12 months predicts fracture in the subsequent 5 years in postmenopausal women

Original Article

Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis consume high amounts of vegetables but insufficient dairy products and calcium to benefit from their virtues: the CoLaus/OsteoLaus cohort