Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 11/2019

01-11-2019 | Osteoporosis | Original Article

FRAX-based intervention and assessment thresholds for osteoporosis in Iran

Authors: P. Khashayar, A. Keshtkar, A. Ostovar, B. Larijani, H. Johansson, N.C. Harvey, M. Lorentzon, E. McCloskey, J.A. Kanis

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 11/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

We compared the utility of the current Iranian guidelines that recommend treatment in women with a T-score ≤ − 2.5 SD with a FRAX-based intervention threshold equivalent to women of average BMI with a prior fragility fracture. Whereas the FRAX-based intervention threshold identified women at high fracture probability, the T-score threshold was less sensitive, and the associated fracture risk decreased markedly with age.

Introduction

The fracture risk assessment algorithm FRAX® has been recently calibrated for Iran, but guidance is needed on how to apply fracture probabilities to clinical practice.

Methods

The age-specific ten-year probabilities of a major osteoporotic fracture were calculated in women with average BMI to determine fracture probabilities at two potential intervention thresholds. The first comprised the age-specific fracture probabilities associated with a femoral neck T-score of − 2.5 SD, in line with current guidelines in Iran. The second approach determined age-specific fracture probabilities that were equivalent to a woman with a prior fragility fracture, without BMD. The parsimonious use of BMD was additionally explored by the computation of upper and lower assessment thresholds for BMD testing.

Results

When a BMD T-score ≤ − 2.5 SD was used as an intervention threshold, FRAX probabilities in women aged 50 years was approximately two-fold higher than in women of the same age but with an average BMD and no risk factors. The relative increase in risk associated with the BMD threshold decreased progressively with age such that, at the age of 80 years or more, a T-score of − 2.5 SD was actually protective. The 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture by age, equivalent to women with a previous fracture rose with age from 4.9% at the age of 50 years to 17%, at the age of 80 years, and identified women at increased risk at all ages.

Conclusion

Intervention thresholds based on BMD alone do not effectively target women at high fracture risk, particularly in the elderly. In contrast, intervention thresholds based on fracture probabilities equivalent to a “fracture threshold” target women at high fracture risk.
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Geneva World Health Organization (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Geneva
2.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Melton LJ 3rd, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Min Res. 9(8):1137–1141CrossRef Kanis JA, Melton LJ 3rd, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Min Res. 9(8):1137–1141CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Osteoporosis Research Center E and MRI (2014) Osteoporosis guideline. Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Institute, Tehran Osteoporosis Research Center E and MRI (2014) Osteoporosis guideline. Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Institute, Tehran
10.
go back to reference Ghafoori S, Keshtkar A, Khashayar P, Ebrahimi M, Ramezani M, Mohammadi Z et al (2014) The risk of osteoporotic fractures and its associating risk factors according to the FRAX model in the Iranian patients: a follow-up cohort. J Diabetes Metab Disord 13(1) Ghafoori S, Keshtkar A, Khashayar P, Ebrahimi M, Ramezani M, Mohammadi Z et al (2014) The risk of osteoporotic fractures and its associating risk factors according to the FRAX model in the Iranian patients: a follow-up cohort. J Diabetes Metab Disord 13(1)
12.
go back to reference Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Strom O, Borgstrom F, Oden A et al (2008) Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX®—assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK. Osteoporos Int [cited 2019 Apr 9];19(10):1395–408. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18751937 Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Strom O, Borgstrom F, Oden A et al (2008) Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX®—assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK. Osteoporos Int [cited 2019 Apr 9];19(10):1395–408. Available from: http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​18751937
16.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Johansson H, De Laet C, Brown J et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int [cited 2019 Apr 9];18(8):1033–46. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17323110 Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Johansson H, De Laet C, Brown J et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int [cited 2019 Apr 9];18(8):1033–46. Available from: http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​17323110
18.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Majumdar SR, Lix LM, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E et al (2012) High fracture probability with FRAX® usually indicates densitometric osteoporosis: implications for clinical practice. Osteoporos Int [cited 2019 Apr 9];23(1):391–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21365460 Leslie WD, Majumdar SR, Lix LM, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E et al (2012) High fracture probability with FRAX® usually indicates densitometric osteoporosis: implications for clinical practice. Osteoporos Int [cited 2019 Apr 9];23(1):391–7. Available from: http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​21365460
Metadata
Title
FRAX-based intervention and assessment thresholds for osteoporosis in Iran
Authors
P. Khashayar
A. Keshtkar
A. Ostovar
B. Larijani
H. Johansson
N.C. Harvey
M. Lorentzon
E. McCloskey
J.A. Kanis
Publication date
01-11-2019
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 11/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-019-05078-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2019

Osteoporosis International 11/2019 Go to the issue