Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 4/2012

Open Access 01-04-2012 | Original Article

Osteoporosis medication prescribing in British Columbia and Ontario: impact of public drug coverage

Authors: S. M. Cadarette, G. Carney, D. Baek, N. Gunraj, J. M. Paterson, C. R. Dormuth

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

We compared the patterns of osteoporosis medication prescribing between two provinces in Canada with different public drug coverage policies. Oral bisphosphonates were the primary drugs used, yet access to the second-generation oral bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate) was limited in one region. Implications of differential access to oral bisphosphonates warrants further study.

Introduction

Approved therapies for treating osteoporosis in Canada include bisphosphonates, calcitonin, denosumab, raloxifene, and teriparatide. However, significant variation in access to these medications through public drug coverage exists across Canada. We sought to compare patterns of osteoporosis medication prescribing between British Columbia (BC) and Ontario.

Methods

Using dispensing data from BC (PharmaNet) and Ontario (Ontario Drug Benefits), we identified all new users of osteoporosis medications aged 66 or more years from 1995/1996 to 2008/2009. We summarized the number of new users by fiscal year, sex, and index drug for each province. BC data were also stratified by whether drugs were dispensed within or outside public PharmaCare.

Results

We identified 578,254 (n = 122,653 BC) eligible new users. Overall patterns were similar between provinces: (1) most patients received an oral bisphosphonate (93% in BC and 99% in Ontario); (2) etidronate prescribing declined after 2001/2002, reaching a low of 41% in BC and 10% in Ontario in 2008/2009; and (3) the proportion of males treated increased over time, from 7% in 1996/1997 to 25% in 2008/2009. However, we note major differences within versus outside the BC PharmaCare system. In particular, <2% of drugs dispensed within PharmaCare compared to 79% of drugs dispensed outside PharmaCare were for a second-generation bisphosphonate (alendronate or risedronate).

Conclusions

Oral bisphosphonates are the primary drugs used to treat osteoporosis in Canada. Prescribing practices changed over time as newer medications came to market, yet access to second-generation bisphosphonates through BC PharmaCare was limited. Implications of differential access to oral bisphosphonates warrants further study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM et al (2010) 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. Can Med Assoc J 182:1864–1873CrossRef Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM et al (2010) 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. Can Med Assoc J 182:1864–1873CrossRef
2.
go back to reference MacLean C, Newberry S, Maglione M et al (2008) Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of treatments to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med 148:197–213PubMed MacLean C, Newberry S, Maglione M et al (2008) Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of treatments to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med 148:197–213PubMed
3.
go back to reference Cranney A, Guyatt G, Griffith L et al (2002) IX: Summary of meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 23:570–578PubMedCrossRef Cranney A, Guyatt G, Griffith L et al (2002) IX: Summary of meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 23:570–578PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Raman-Wilms L, Beaton DE, Paterson JM (2011) Osteoporosis quality indicators using healthcare utilization data. Osteoporos Int 22:1335–1342PubMedCrossRef Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Raman-Wilms L, Beaton DE, Paterson JM (2011) Osteoporosis quality indicators using healthcare utilization data. Osteoporos Int 22:1335–1342PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Brown JP, Josse RG, Scientific Advisory Council of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada (2002) 2002 Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. Can Med Assoc J 167(10 Suppl):S1–S34 Brown JP, Josse RG, Scientific Advisory Council of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada (2002) 2002 Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. Can Med Assoc J 167(10 Suppl):S1–S34
8.
go back to reference Brown JP, Fortier M, Frame H et al (2006) Canadian consensus conference on osteoporosis, 2006 update. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 28:S95–S112PubMed Brown JP, Fortier M, Frame H et al (2006) Canadian consensus conference on osteoporosis, 2006 update. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 28:S95–S112PubMed
9.
go back to reference Scientific Advisory Board, Osteoporosis Society of Canada (1996) Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Can Med Assoc J 155:1113–1133 Scientific Advisory Board, Osteoporosis Society of Canada (1996) Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Can Med Assoc J 155:1113–1133
10.
go back to reference Mamdani M, Kopp A, Hawker G (2007) Hip fractures in users of first- vs. second-generation bisphosphonates. Osteoporos Int 18:1595–1600PubMedCrossRef Mamdani M, Kopp A, Hawker G (2007) Hip fractures in users of first- vs. second-generation bisphosphonates. Osteoporos Int 18:1595–1600PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Osteoporosis medication prescribing in British Columbia and Ontario: impact of public drug coverage
Authors
S. M. Cadarette
G. Carney
D. Baek
N. Gunraj
J. M. Paterson
C. R. Dormuth
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1771-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Osteoporosis International 4/2012 Go to the issue