Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 3/2012

01-03-2012 | Original Article

Validated risk rule using computerized data to identify males at high risk for fracture

Authors: J. LaFleur, R. E. Nelson, Y. Yao, R. A. Adler, J. R. Nebeker

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

Absolute risk assessment is now the preferred approach to guide osteoporosis treatment decisions. Data collected passively during routine healthcare operations can be used to develop discriminative absolute risk assessment rules in male veterans. These rules could be used to develop computerized clinical decision support tools that might improve fracture prevention.

Introduction

Absolute risk assessment is the preferred approach to guiding treatment decisions in osteoporosis. Current recommended risk stratification rules perform poorly in men, among whom osteoporosis is overlooked and undertreated. A potential solution lies in clinical decision support technology. The objective of this study was to determine whether data passively collected in routine healthcare operations could identify male veterans at highest risk with acceptable discrimination.

Methods

Using administrative and clinical databases for male veterans ≥50 years old who sought care in 2005–2006, we created risk stratification rules for hip and any major fracture. We identified variables related to known or theoretical risk factors and created prognostic models using Cox regression. We validated the rules and estimated optimism. We created risk scores from hazards ratios and used them to predict fractures with logistic regression.

Results

The predictive models had C-statistics of 0.81 for hip and 0.74 for any major fracture, suggesting good to acceptable discrimination. For hip fracture, the cut-point that maximized percentage classified correctly (accuracy) predicted 165 of 227 hip fractures (73%) and missed 62 (27%). All hip fractures in patients with prior fracture were identified and 67% in patients without. For any major fracture, the maximal-accuracy cut-point predicted 611 of 987 (62%) and missed 376 (38%); the rule predicted all 134 fractures in patients with prior fracture and 56% in patients without.

Conclusion

Data collected passively in routine healthcare operations can identify male veterans at highest risk for fracture with discrimination that exceeds that reported for other methods applied in men.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Sandhu SK, Nguyen ND, Center JR, Pocock NA, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2009) Prognosis of fracture: evaluation of predictive accuracy of the FRAX algorithm and Garvan nomogram. Osteoporos Int 21(5):863–871 Sandhu SK, Nguyen ND, Center JR, Pocock NA, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2009) Prognosis of fracture: evaluation of predictive accuracy of the FRAX algorithm and Garvan nomogram. Osteoporos Int 21(5):863–871
3.
go back to reference Robbins J, Aragaki AK, Kooperberg C, Watts N, Wactawski-Wende J, Jackson RD, LeBoff MS, Lewis CE, Chen Z, Stefanick ML, Cauley J (2007) Factors associated with 5-year risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. JAMA 298:2389–2398PubMedCrossRef Robbins J, Aragaki AK, Kooperberg C, Watts N, Wactawski-Wende J, Jackson RD, LeBoff MS, Lewis CE, Chen Z, Stefanick ML, Cauley J (2007) Factors associated with 5-year risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. JAMA 298:2389–2398PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2008) Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks. Osteoporos Int 19:1431–1444PubMedCrossRef Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2008) Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks. Osteoporos Int 19:1431–1444PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Morris CA, Cabral D, Cheng H, Katz JN, Finkelstein JS, Avorn J, Solomon DH (2004) Patterns of bone mineral density testing: current guidelines, testing rates, and interventions. J Gen Intern Med 19:783–790PubMedCrossRef Morris CA, Cabral D, Cheng H, Katz JN, Finkelstein JS, Avorn J, Solomon DH (2004) Patterns of bone mineral density testing: current guidelines, testing rates, and interventions. J Gen Intern Med 19:783–790PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Simonelli C, Killeen K, Mehle S, Swanson L (2002) Barriers to osteoporosis identification and treatment among primary care physicians and orthopedic surgeons. Mayo Clin Proc 77:334–338PubMedCrossRef Simonelli C, Killeen K, Mehle S, Swanson L (2002) Barriers to osteoporosis identification and treatment among primary care physicians and orthopedic surgeons. Mayo Clin Proc 77:334–338PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Feldstein A, Elmer PJ, Smith DH, Herson M, Orwoll E, Chen C, Aickin M, Swain MC (2006) Electronic medical record reminder improves osteoporosis management after a fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:450–457PubMedCrossRef Feldstein A, Elmer PJ, Smith DH, Herson M, Orwoll E, Chen C, Aickin M, Swain MC (2006) Electronic medical record reminder improves osteoporosis management after a fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:450–457PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Tsang JF, Lix LM (2008) Validation of ten-year fracture risk prediction: a clinical cohort study from the Manitoba Bone Density Program. Bone 43:667–671PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD, Tsang JF, Lix LM (2008) Validation of ten-year fracture risk prediction: a clinical cohort study from the Manitoba Bone Density Program. Bone 43:667–671PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hodgson SF, Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Clarke BL, Gray TK et al (2003) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2001 edition, with selected updates for 2003. Endocr Pract 9:544–564PubMed Hodgson SF, Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Clarke BL, Gray TK et al (2003) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2001 edition, with selected updates for 2003. Endocr Pract 9:544–564PubMed
12.
go back to reference Harrell FE (2001) Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, New York Harrell FE (2001) Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, New York
13.
go back to reference Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE Jr, Borsboom GJ, Eijkemans MJ, Vergouwe Y, Habbema JD (2001) Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 54:774–781PubMedCrossRef Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE Jr, Borsboom GJ, Eijkemans MJ, Vergouwe Y, Habbema JD (2001) Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 54:774–781PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Altman DG, Royston P (2000) What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med 19:453–473PubMedCrossRef Altman DG, Royston P (2000) What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med 19:453–473PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB (1996) Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 15:361–387PubMedCrossRef Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB (1996) Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 15:361–387PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Vanasse A, Dagenais P, Niyonsenga T, Gregoire JP, Courteau J, Hemiari A (2005) Bone mineral density measurement and osteoporosis treatment after a fragility fracture in older adults: regional variation and determinants of use in Quebec. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 6:33PubMedCrossRef Vanasse A, Dagenais P, Niyonsenga T, Gregoire JP, Courteau J, Hemiari A (2005) Bone mineral density measurement and osteoporosis treatment after a fragility fracture in older adults: regional variation and determinants of use in Quebec. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 6:33PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schuit SC, van der Klift M, Weel AE, de Laet CE, Burger H, Seeman E, Hofman A, Uitterlinden AG, van Leeuwen JP, Pols HA (2004) Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. Bone 34:195–202PubMedCrossRef Schuit SC, van der Klift M, Weel AE, de Laet CE, Burger H, Seeman E, Hofman A, Uitterlinden AG, van Leeuwen JP, Pols HA (2004) Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. Bone 34:195–202PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tosteson AN, Melton LJ 3rd, Dawson-Hughes B, Baim S, Favus MJ, Khosla S, Lindsay RL (2008) Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective. Osteoporos Int 19:437–447PubMedCrossRef Tosteson AN, Melton LJ 3rd, Dawson-Hughes B, Baim S, Favus MJ, Khosla S, Lindsay RL (2008) Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective. Osteoporos Int 19:437–447PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2007) Development of a nomogram for individualizing hip fracture risk in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1109–1117PubMedCrossRef Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2007) Development of a nomogram for individualizing hip fracture risk in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1109–1117PubMedCrossRef
20.
21.
go back to reference Siris ES, Simon JA, Barton IP, McClung MR, Grauer A (2008) Effects of risedronate on fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteopenia. Osteoporos Int 19:681–686PubMedCrossRef Siris ES, Simon JA, Barton IP, McClung MR, Grauer A (2008) Effects of risedronate on fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteopenia. Osteoporos Int 19:681–686PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Baron JA, Barrett J, Malenka D, Fisher E, Kniffin W, Bubolz T, Tosteson T (1994) Racial differences in fracture risk. Epidemiology 5:42–47PubMedCrossRef Baron JA, Barrett J, Malenka D, Fisher E, Kniffin W, Bubolz T, Tosteson T (1994) Racial differences in fracture risk. Epidemiology 5:42–47PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Validated risk rule using computerized data to identify males at high risk for fracture
Authors
J. LaFleur
R. E. Nelson
Y. Yao
R. A. Adler
J. R. Nebeker
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1646-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Osteoporosis International 3/2012 Go to the issue