Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 11/2009

01-11-2009 | Original Article

Do physicians within the same practice setting manage osteoporosis patients similarly? Implications for implementation research

Authors: J. R. Curtis, T. Arora, J. Xi, A. Silver, J. J. Allison, L. Chen, K. G. Saag, A. Schenck, A. O. Westfall, C. Colón-Emeric

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 11/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

Using data from long-term glucocorticoid users and long-term care residents, we evaluated osteoporosis prescribing patterns related to physician behavior and common practice settings. We found no significant clustering effect for common practice setting, suggesting that osteoporosis quality improvement (QI) efforts may be able to ignore this factor in designing QI interventions.

Introduction

Patients’ receipt of prescription therapies are significantly influenced by their physician’s prescribing patterns. If physicians in the same practice setting influence one another’s prescribing, evidence implementation interventions must consider targeting the practice as well as individual physicians to achieve maximal success.

Methods

We examined receipt of osteoporosis treatment (OP Rx) from two prior evidence implementation studies: long-term glucocorticoid (GC) users and nursing home (NH) residents with prior fracture or osteoporosis. Common practice setting was defined as doctors practicing at the same address or in the same nursing home. Alternating logistic regression evaluated the relationship between OP Rx, common practice setting, and individual physician treatment patterns.

Results

Among 6,281 GC users in 1,296 practices, the proportion receiving OP Rx in each practice was 6–100%. Among 779 NH residents in 66 nursing homes, the proportion in each NH receiving OP Rx was 0–100%. In both, there was no significant relationship between receipt of OP Rx and common practice setting after accounting for treatment pattern of individual physicians.

Conclusion

Physicians practicing together were not more alike in prescribing osteoporosis medications than those in different practices. Osteoporosis quality improvement may be able to ignore common practice settings and maximize statistical power by targeting individual physicians.
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Committee for Quality Assurance: State of Health Care Quality. 2006 National Committee for Quality Assurance: State of Health Care Quality. 2006
2.
go back to reference Curtis JR, Westfall AO, Allison JJ et al (2005) Longitudinal patterns in the prevention of osteoporosis in glucocorticoid-treated patients. Arthritis Rheum 52(8):2485–2494CrossRefPubMed Curtis JR, Westfall AO, Allison JJ et al (2005) Longitudinal patterns in the prevention of osteoporosis in glucocorticoid-treated patients. Arthritis Rheum 52(8):2485–2494CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Colon-Emeric C, Lyles KW, Levine DA et al (2007) Prevalence and predictors of osteoporosis treatment in nursing home residents with known osteoporosis or recent fracture. Osteoporos Int 18(4):553–559CrossRefPubMed Colon-Emeric C, Lyles KW, Levine DA et al (2007) Prevalence and predictors of osteoporosis treatment in nursing home residents with known osteoporosis or recent fracture. Osteoporos Int 18(4):553–559CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Physician Voluntary Reporting Program. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2007 Physician Voluntary Reporting Program. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2007
5.
go back to reference Colon-Emeric CS, Casebeer L, Saag K et al (2005) Barriers to providing osteoporosis care in skilled nursing facilities: perceptions of medical directors and directors of nursing. J Am Med Dir Assoc 6(3 Suppl):S61–S66CrossRefPubMed Colon-Emeric CS, Casebeer L, Saag K et al (2005) Barriers to providing osteoporosis care in skilled nursing facilities: perceptions of medical directors and directors of nursing. J Am Med Dir Assoc 6(3 Suppl):S61–S66CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Brookhart MA, Solomon DH, Wang P, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Schneeweiss S (2006) Explained variation in a model of therapeutic decision making is partitioned across patient, physician, and clinic factors. J Clin Epidemiol 59(1):18–25CrossRefPubMed Brookhart MA, Solomon DH, Wang P, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Schneeweiss S (2006) Explained variation in a model of therapeutic decision making is partitioned across patient, physician, and clinic factors. J Clin Epidemiol 59(1):18–25CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Murray DM (1998) Design and analysis of group randomized trials . Oxford University Press, Oxford Murray DM (1998) Design and analysis of group randomized trials . Oxford University Press, Oxford
8.
go back to reference Curtis JR, Westfall AO, Allison J et al (2007) Challenges in improving the quality of osteoporosis care for long-term glucocorticoid users: a prospective randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 167(6):591–596CrossRefPubMed Curtis JR, Westfall AO, Allison J et al (2007) Challenges in improving the quality of osteoporosis care for long-term glucocorticoid users: a prospective randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 167(6):591–596CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Colon-Emeric CS, Lyles KW, House P et al (2007) Randomized trial to improve fracture prevention in nursing home residents. Am J Med 120(10):886–892CrossRefPubMed Colon-Emeric CS, Lyles KW, House P et al (2007) Randomized trial to improve fracture prevention in nursing home residents. Am J Med 120(10):886–892CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Preisser JS, Arcury TA, Quandt SA (2003) Detecting patterns of occupational illness clustering with alternating logistic regressions applied to longitudinal data. Am J Epidemiol 158(5):495–501CrossRefPubMed Preisser JS, Arcury TA, Quandt SA (2003) Detecting patterns of occupational illness clustering with alternating logistic regressions applied to longitudinal data. Am J Epidemiol 158(5):495–501CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Feng Z, Diehr P, Peterson A, McLerran D (2001) Selected statistical issues in group randomized trials. Annu Rev Public Health 22:167–187CrossRefPubMed Feng Z, Diehr P, Peterson A, McLerran D (2001) Selected statistical issues in group randomized trials. Annu Rev Public Health 22:167–187CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Snijders TAB (2005) Power and sample size in multilevel linear models. In: Everitt BS, Howell DC (eds) Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science, vol 3. Chicester, Wiley, pp 1570–1573 Snijders TAB (2005) Power and sample size in multilevel linear models. In: Everitt BS, Howell DC (eds) Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science, vol 3. Chicester, Wiley, pp 1570–1573
13.
go back to reference Campbell MK, Thomson S, Ramsay CR, MacLennan GS, Grimshaw JM (2004) Sample size calculator for cluster randomized trials. Comput Biol Med 34(2):113–125CrossRefPubMed Campbell MK, Thomson S, Ramsay CR, MacLennan GS, Grimshaw JM (2004) Sample size calculator for cluster randomized trials. Comput Biol Med 34(2):113–125CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Glynn RJ, Brookhart MA, Stedman M, Avorn J, Solomon DH (2007) Design of cluster-randomized trials of quality improvement interventions aimed at medical care providers. Med Care 45(10 Supl 2):S38–S43CrossRefPubMed Glynn RJ, Brookhart MA, Stedman M, Avorn J, Solomon DH (2007) Design of cluster-randomized trials of quality improvement interventions aimed at medical care providers. Med Care 45(10 Supl 2):S38–S43CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Do physicians within the same practice setting manage osteoporosis patients similarly? Implications for implementation research
Authors
J. R. Curtis
T. Arora
J. Xi
A. Silver
J. J. Allison
L. Chen
K. G. Saag
A. Schenck
A. O. Westfall
C. Colón-Emeric
Publication date
01-11-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 11/2009
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0900-7

Other articles of this Issue 11/2009

Osteoporosis International 11/2009 Go to the issue