Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 3/2009

01-03-2009 | Original Article

Geographical variations in hip fracture risk for women: strong effects hidden in standardised ratios

Authors: S. Barbier, R. Ecochard, A.-M. Schott, C. Colin, P. D. Delmas, S. B. Jaglal, C. M. Couris

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 3/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

There was 75% variation in the trend in hip fracture incidence with age in women aged 50 to 85 in France. In southwest France, the women are at higher risk of hip fracture at younger ages. This finding should be taken into account when examining risk factors.

Introduction

Few studies have analysed the geographical variations in the relationship between age and hip fracture incidence. Our goal was to assess these variations among women under 85 within the same country.

Methods

The study population included women aged 50 to 85 who were living in France in 2004. Hip fracture cases were identified in the French Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG)-like database using the diagnosis code for closed hip fractures and procedural codes for treatment. The Moran index and a spatial model using latitude and longitude were used to assess the geographical heterogeneities of cumulative incidence risk (CIR) and age effect.

Results

A total of 29,218 hip fracture cases were identified. A south-to-north CIR gradient ranging from 7 to 16% was observed. The variation in the number of years until double hip fracture incidence was 75% (i.e. 1.49 to 2.57 years). In the south, and more markedly in southwest France, the women are at higher risk of hip fracture at a younger age.

Conclusion

The risk of fracture may be different between women of the same age. This may be hidden in a comparison of standardised ratios. This finding should be considered when examining risk factors and implementing public health interventions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Johnell O, Kanis JA (2004) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:897–902PubMedCrossRef Johnell O, Kanis JA (2004) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:897–902PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kannus P, Sievanen H, Palvanen M, Jarvinen T, Parkkari J (2005) Prevention of falls and consequent injuries in elderly people. Lancet 366:1885–1893PubMedCrossRef Kannus P, Sievanen H, Palvanen M, Jarvinen T, Parkkari J (2005) Prevention of falls and consequent injuries in elderly people. Lancet 366:1885–1893PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Goettsch WG, de Jong RB, Kramarz P, Herings RM (2007) Developments of the incidence of osteoporosis in The Netherlands: a PHARMO study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 16:166–172PubMedCrossRef Goettsch WG, de Jong RB, Kramarz P, Herings RM (2007) Developments of the incidence of osteoporosis in The Netherlands: a PHARMO study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 16:166–172PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jaglal SB, Weller I, Mamdani M et al (2005) Population trends in BMD testing, treatment, and hip and wrist fracture rates: are the hip fracture projections wrong? J Bone Miner Res 20:898–905PubMedCrossRef Jaglal SB, Weller I, Mamdani M et al (2005) Population trends in BMD testing, treatment, and hip and wrist fracture rates: are the hip fracture projections wrong? J Bone Miner Res 20:898–905PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Papadimitropoulos EA, Coyte PC, Josse RG, Greenwood CE (1997) Current and projected rates of hip fracture in Canada. CMAJ 157:1357–1363PubMed Papadimitropoulos EA, Coyte PC, Josse RG, Greenwood CE (1997) Current and projected rates of hip fracture in Canada. CMAJ 157:1357–1363PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Palvanen M, Vuori I, Jarvinen M (1999) Hip fractures in Finland between 1970 and 1997 and predictions for the future. Lancet 353:802–805PubMedCrossRef Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Palvanen M, Vuori I, Jarvinen M (1999) Hip fractures in Finland between 1970 and 1997 and predictions for the future. Lancet 353:802–805PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lönnroos E, Kautiainen H, Karppi P et al (2006) Increased incidence of hip fractures. A population-based study in Finland. Bone 39:623–627PubMedCrossRef Lönnroos E, Kautiainen H, Karppi P et al (2006) Increased incidence of hip fractures. A population-based study in Finland. Bone 39:623–627PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Baudoin C, Fardellone P, Thelot B et al (1996) Hip fractures in France: the magnitude and perspective of the problem. Osteoporos Int 6 [Suppl 3]:1–10PubMedCrossRef Baudoin C, Fardellone P, Thelot B et al (1996) Hip fractures in France: the magnitude and perspective of the problem. Osteoporos Int 6 [Suppl 3]:1–10PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Elffors I, Allander E, Kanis JA et al (1994) The variable incidence of hip fracture in southern Europe: the MEDOS Study. Osteoporos Int 4:253–263PubMedCrossRef Elffors I, Allander E, Kanis JA et al (1994) The variable incidence of hip fracture in southern Europe: the MEDOS Study. Osteoporos Int 4:253–263PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ismail AA, Pye SR, Cockerill WC et al (2002) Incidence of limb fracture across Europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). Osteoporos Int 13:565–571PubMedCrossRef Ismail AA, Pye SR, Cockerill WC et al (2002) Incidence of limb fracture across Europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). Osteoporos Int 13:565–571PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Johnell O, Borgstrom F, Jonsson B, Kanis J (2007) Latitude, socioeconomic prosperity, mobile phones and hip fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 18:333–337PubMedCrossRef Johnell O, Borgstrom F, Jonsson B, Kanis J (2007) Latitude, socioeconomic prosperity, mobile phones and hip fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 18:333–337PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jonsson B, Oden A, Ogelsby AK (2002) International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:1237–1244PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jonsson B, Oden A, Ogelsby AK (2002) International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:1237–1244PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schwartz AV, Kelsey JL, Maggi S et al (1999) International variation in the incidence of hip fractures: cross-national project on osteoporosis for the World Health Organization Program for Research on Aging. Osteoporos Int 9:242–253PubMedCrossRef Schwartz AV, Kelsey JL, Maggi S et al (1999) International variation in the incidence of hip fractures: cross-national project on osteoporosis for the World Health Organization Program for Research on Aging. Osteoporos Int 9:242–253PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Breslow N, Day NE (1987) Statistical methods in cancer research, vol II—the design and analysis of cohort studies. IARC, Lyon Breslow N, Day NE (1987) Statistical methods in cancer research, vol II—the design and analysis of cohort studies. IARC, Lyon
16.
go back to reference Chang KP, Center JR, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA (2004) Incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures in elderly men and women: Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. J Bone Miner Res 19:532–536PubMedCrossRef Chang KP, Center JR, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA (2004) Incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures in elderly men and women: Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. J Bone Miner Res 19:532–536PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Huusko TM, Karppi P, Avikainen V, Kautiainen H, Sulkava R (1999) The changing picture of hip fractures: dramatic change in age distribution and no change in age-adjusted incidence within 10 years in Central Finland. Bone 24:257–259PubMedCrossRef Huusko TM, Karppi P, Avikainen V, Kautiainen H, Sulkava R (1999) The changing picture of hip fractures: dramatic change in age distribution and no change in age-adjusted incidence within 10 years in Central Finland. Bone 24:257–259PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lofman O, Berglund K, Larsson L, Toss G (2002) Changes in hip fracture epidemiology: redistribution between ages, genders and fracture types. Osteoporos Int 13:18–25PubMedCrossRef Lofman O, Berglund K, Larsson L, Toss G (2002) Changes in hip fracture epidemiology: redistribution between ages, genders and fracture types. Osteoporos Int 13:18–25PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Couris CM, Duclos A, Rabilloud M et al (2007) A seventy percent overestimation of the burden of hip fractures in women aged 85 and over. Bone 41:896–900PubMedCrossRef Couris CM, Duclos A, Rabilloud M et al (2007) A seventy percent overestimation of the burden of hip fractures in women aged 85 and over. Bone 41:896–900PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Cliff A, Ord J (1981) Spatial processes: models and applications. Pion, London Cliff A, Ord J (1981) Spatial processes: models and applications. Pion, London
21.
go back to reference O’Sullivan D, Unwin D (2002) Geographic information analysis. Wiley, New York O’Sullivan D, Unwin D (2002) Geographic information analysis. Wiley, New York
22.
go back to reference Hinton RY, Lennox DW, Ebert FR, Jacobsen SJ, Smith GS (1995) Relative rates of fracture of the hip in the United States. Geographic, sex, and age variations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:695–702PubMed Hinton RY, Lennox DW, Ebert FR, Jacobsen SJ, Smith GS (1995) Relative rates of fracture of the hip in the United States. Geographic, sex, and age variations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:695–702PubMed
23.
go back to reference Karagas MR, Lu-Yao GL, Barrett JA, Beach ML, Baron JA (1996) Heterogeneity of hip fracture: age, race, sex, and geographic patterns of femoral neck and trochanteric fractures among the US elderly. Am J Epidemiol 143:677–682PubMed Karagas MR, Lu-Yao GL, Barrett JA, Beach ML, Baron JA (1996) Heterogeneity of hip fracture: age, race, sex, and geographic patterns of femoral neck and trochanteric fractures among the US elderly. Am J Epidemiol 143:677–682PubMed
24.
go back to reference Johnell O, Gullberg B, Kanis JA et al (1995) Risk factors for hip fracture in European women: the MEDOS Study. Mediterranean Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 10:1802–1815PubMedCrossRef Johnell O, Gullberg B, Kanis JA et al (1995) Risk factors for hip fracture in European women: the MEDOS Study. Mediterranean Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 10:1802–1815PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Becker C, Crow S, Toman J et al (2006) Characteristics of elderly patients admitted to an urban tertiary care hospital with osteoporotic fractures: correlations with risk factors, fracture type, gender and ethnicity. Osteoporos Int 17:410–416PubMedCrossRef Becker C, Crow S, Toman J et al (2006) Characteristics of elderly patients admitted to an urban tertiary care hospital with osteoporotic fractures: correlations with risk factors, fracture type, gender and ethnicity. Osteoporos Int 17:410–416PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Meyer HE, Berntsen GK, Sogaard AJ et al (2004) Higher bone mineral density in rural compared with urban dwellers: the NOREPOS study. Am J Epidemiol 160:1039–1046PubMedCrossRef Meyer HE, Berntsen GK, Sogaard AJ et al (2004) Higher bone mineral density in rural compared with urban dwellers: the NOREPOS study. Am J Epidemiol 160:1039–1046PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sanders KM, Nicholson GC, Ugoni AM, Seeman E, Pasco JA, Kotowicz MA (2002) Fracture rates lower in rural than urban communities: the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:466–470PubMedCrossRef Sanders KM, Nicholson GC, Ugoni AM, Seeman E, Pasco JA, Kotowicz MA (2002) Fracture rates lower in rural than urban communities: the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:466–470PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Zingmond DS, Soohoo NF, Silverman SL (2006) The role of socioeconomic status on hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 17:1562–1568PubMedCrossRef Zingmond DS, Soohoo NF, Silverman SL (2006) The role of socioeconomic status on hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 17:1562–1568PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Feskanich D, Willett W, Colditz G (2002) Walking and leisure-time activity and risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. JAMA 288:2300–2306PubMedCrossRef Feskanich D, Willett W, Colditz G (2002) Walking and leisure-time activity and risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. JAMA 288:2300–2306PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Robbins J, Aragaki AK, Kooperberg C et al (2007) Factors associated with 5-year risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. JAMA 298:2389–2398PubMedCrossRef Robbins J, Aragaki AK, Kooperberg C et al (2007) Factors associated with 5-year risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. JAMA 298:2389–2398PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference McCabe LD, Martin BR, McCabe GP, Johnston CC, Weaver CM, Peacock M (2004) Dairy intakes affect bone density in the elderly. Am J Clin Nutr 80:1066–1074PubMed McCabe LD, Martin BR, McCabe GP, Johnston CC, Weaver CM, Peacock M (2004) Dairy intakes affect bone density in the elderly. Am J Clin Nutr 80:1066–1074PubMed
32.
go back to reference Prince RL, Devine A, Dhaliwal SS, Dick IM (2006) Effects of calcium supplementation on clinical fracture and bone structure: results of a 5-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in elderly women. Arch Intern Med 166:869–875PubMedCrossRef Prince RL, Devine A, Dhaliwal SS, Dick IM (2006) Effects of calcium supplementation on clinical fracture and bone structure: results of a 5-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in elderly women. Arch Intern Med 166:869–875PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Geographical variations in hip fracture risk for women: strong effects hidden in standardised ratios
Authors
S. Barbier
R. Ecochard
A.-M. Schott
C. Colin
P. D. Delmas
S. B. Jaglal
C. M. Couris
Publication date
01-03-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0687-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

Osteoporosis International 3/2009 Go to the issue