Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 3/2008

01-03-2008 | Original Article

Direct costs of osteoporosis and hip fracture: an analysis for the Mexican healthcare system

Authors: P. Clark, F. Carlos, C. Barrera, J. Guzman, A. Maetzel, P. Lavielle, E. Ramirez, V. Robinson, R. Rodriguez-Cabrera, J. Tamayo, P. Tugwell

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 3/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

This study reports the direct costs related to osteoporosis and hip fractures paid for governmental and private institutions in the Mexican health system and estimates the impact of these entities on Mexico. We conclude that the economic burden due to the direct costs of hip fracture justifies wide-scale prevention programs for osteoporosis (OP).

Methods

To estimate the total direct costs of OP and hip fractures in the Mexican Health care system, a sample of governmental and private institutions were studied. Information was gathered through direct questionnaires in 275 OP patients and 218 hip fracture cases. Additionally, a chart review was conducted and experts’ opinions obtained to get accurate protocol scenarios for diagnoses and treatment of OP with no fracture. Microcosting and activity-based costing techniques were used to yield unit costs.

Results

The total direct costs for OP and hip fracture were estimated for 2006 based on the projected annual incidence of hip fractures in Mexico. A total of 22,233 hip fracture cases were estimated for 2006 with a total cost to the healthcare system of US$ 97,058,159 for the acute treatment alone ($4,365.50 per case). We found considerable differences in costs and the way the patients were treated across the different health sectors within the country.

Conclusion

Costs of the acute treatment of hip fractures in Mexico are high and are expected to increase with the predicted increment of life expectancy and the number of elderly in our population.
Literature
1.
go back to reference US Bone Health and Osteoporosis: a report of the Surgeon General, M.U.a.H.D.o.H.S. Rockville, Office of the Surgeon General, Editor. 2004, US Department of Health and Human Services US Bone Health and Osteoporosis: a report of the Surgeon General, M.U.a.H.D.o.H.S. Rockville, Office of the Surgeon General, Editor. 2004, US Department of Health and Human Services
2.
go back to reference Bagur A, Mautalen C, Rubin Z (1994) Epidemiology of hip fractures in an urban population of central Argentina. Osteoporos Int 4(6):332–335PubMedCrossRef Bagur A, Mautalen C, Rubin Z (1994) Epidemiology of hip fractures in an urban population of central Argentina. Osteoporos Int 4(6):332–335PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Clark P et al (2004) Prevalence of vertebral fractures in Brazil, Puerto Rico and Mexico. Preliminary report of the Latin American Vertebral Osteoporosis Study LAVOS. J Bone Miner Res 19 [Suppl 1]:S87 Clark P et al (2004) Prevalence of vertebral fractures in Brazil, Puerto Rico and Mexico. Preliminary report of the Latin American Vertebral Osteoporosis Study LAVOS. J Bone Miner Res 19 [Suppl 1]:S87
4.
go back to reference Clark P et al (2005) Incidence rates and life-time risk of hip fractures in Mexicans over 50 years of age: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int 16(12):2025–2030PubMedCrossRef Clark P et al (2005) Incidence rates and life-time risk of hip fractures in Mexicans over 50 years of age: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int 16(12):2025–2030PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kanis JA (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int 4(6):368–381PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int 4(6):368–381PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Clark P et al (2006) The prevalence of low bone mineral density in a random sample of Mexican women and men 50 years and older. A population study. J Clin Densitom 9(2):234CrossRef Clark P et al (2006) The prevalence of low bone mineral density in a random sample of Mexican women and men 50 years and older. A population study. J Clin Densitom 9(2):234CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cruz Gonzalez I et al (2002) Costos institucionales y dificultades en la atención de los pacientes con fracturas por osteoporosis. Acta Ortop Mex 16(6):292–295 Cruz Gonzalez I et al (2002) Costos institucionales y dificultades en la atención de los pacientes con fracturas por osteoporosis. Acta Ortop Mex 16(6):292–295
8.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2003) Trends in aging—United States and worldwide MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 52(6):101–104, 106 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2003) Trends in aging—United States and worldwide MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 52(6):101–104, 106
9.
go back to reference CONAPO, INEGI y COLMEX. Conciliacion demografica 2000–2005 CONAPO, INEGI y COLMEX. Conciliacion demografica 2000–2005
10.
go back to reference Barraza-Llorens M et al (2002) Addressing inequity in health and health care in Mexico. Health Aff (Millwood) 21(3):47–56CrossRef Barraza-Llorens M et al (2002) Addressing inequity in health and health care in Mexico. Health Aff (Millwood) 21(3):47–56CrossRef
11.
go back to reference INEGI, Instituto Nacional de Estadistica Geografia e Informática, 2006 INEGI, Instituto Nacional de Estadistica Geografia e Informática, 2006
13.
go back to reference Proyecciones de la poblacion Mexicana 2000–2050. Prospectiva demografica, in ISBN 970-628-671-3, C.N.d. Poblacion, Editor, 2002 Proyecciones de la poblacion Mexicana 2000–2050. Prospectiva demografica, in ISBN 970-628-671-3, C.N.d. Poblacion, Editor, 2002
14.
go back to reference Reginster JY et al (1999) Direct costs of hip fractures in patients over 60 years of age in Belgium. Pharmacoeconomics 15(5):507–514PubMedCrossRef Reginster JY et al (1999) Direct costs of hip fractures in patients over 60 years of age in Belgium. Pharmacoeconomics 15(5):507–514PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schurch MA et al (1996) A prospective study on socioeconomic aspects of fracture of the proximal femur. J Bone Miner Res 11(12):1935–1942PubMedCrossRef Schurch MA et al (1996) A prospective study on socioeconomic aspects of fracture of the proximal femur. J Bone Miner Res 11(12):1935–1942PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lippuner K, Golder M, Greiner R (2005) Epidemiology and direct medical costs of osteoporotic fractures in men and women in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 16 [Suppl 2]:S8–S17PubMedCrossRef Lippuner K, Golder M, Greiner R (2005) Epidemiology and direct medical costs of osteoporotic fractures in men and women in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 16 [Suppl 2]:S8–S17PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wong MK et al (2002) Osteoporotic hip fractures in Singapore—costs and patient’s outcome. Ann Acad Med Singap 31(1):3–7PubMed Wong MK et al (2002) Osteoporotic hip fractures in Singapore—costs and patient’s outcome. Ann Acad Med Singap 31(1):3–7PubMed
18.
go back to reference Johnell O et al (2005) The burden of hospitalised fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 16(2):222–228PubMedCrossRef Johnell O et al (2005) The burden of hospitalised fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 16(2):222–228PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Johnell O, Kanis JA (2004) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 15(11):897–902PubMedCrossRef Johnell O, Kanis JA (2004) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 15(11):897–902PubMedCrossRef
20.
Metadata
Title
Direct costs of osteoporosis and hip fracture: an analysis for the Mexican healthcare system
Authors
P. Clark
F. Carlos
C. Barrera
J. Guzman
A. Maetzel
P. Lavielle
E. Ramirez
V. Robinson
R. Rodriguez-Cabrera
J. Tamayo
P. Tugwell
Publication date
01-03-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0496-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2008

Osteoporosis International 3/2008 Go to the issue