Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 7/2007

01-07-2007 | Original Article

Psychometric properties of the “Osteoporosis and You” questionnaire: osteoporosis knowledge deficits among older community-dwelling women

Authors: S. M. Cadarette, M. A. M. Gignac, D. E. Beaton, S. B. Jaglal, G. A. Hawker

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 7/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

In older women, knowledge about risk factors for osteoporosis was good, with over 75% responding correctly to questions about lifestyle factors, family history, height loss, and menopausal status. However, significant knowledge deficits were identified regarding osteoporosis “consequences” and “prevention and treatment.”

Introduction

We examined osteoporosis knowledge by testing the psychometric properties of the 10-item knowledge component of the “Osteoporosis and You” questionnaire. Several knowledge domains were hypothesized.

Methods

Community-dwelling women aged 65–90 years residing within two regions of Ontario, Canada were studied (N = 869). Data were collected by standardized telephone interviews in 2003 and 2004. Items to which 75% or more responded correctly were identified as having a low index of difficulty; the remaining items identified areas of knowledge deficit. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test scale structure.

Results

Six of the ten items had a low index of difficulty. These items largely examined osteoporosis risk factors. The remaining four items identified significant knowledge deficits in the areas of osteoporosis consequences, prevention, and treatment. Confirmatory factor analysis identified four distinct osteoporosis knowledge domains. However, the internal consistency was low for all but one domain, which examined “prevention and treatment.”

Conclusion

Although older women appear to be aware of osteoporosis risk factors, knowledge deficits regarding the consequences of osteoporosis and that treatment exists to prevent bone loss were identified. Better understanding of the multi-dimensional aspects of osteoporosis knowledge may help to inform the development of effective educational interventions.
Glossary
Domain
An underlying trait (latent variable, hypothetical construct or attribute) that cannot be measure directly, but can be inferred from multiple items supposedly based upon it
Factor
Domain in reference to factor analysis (statistical method employed to determine scale structure), indicating items that are grouped together based on a similar distribution of responses
Item
A single question aiming to tap into an aspect of an underlying domain
Scale
Multi-item questionnaire designed to measure at least one domain.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Andersen RM (1995) Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 36:1–10PubMedCrossRef Andersen RM (1995) Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 36:1–10PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM (2002) Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM (2002) Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
3.
go back to reference Werner P (2005) Knowledge about osteoporosis: assessment, correlates and outcomes. Osteoporos Int 16:115–127PubMedCrossRef Werner P (2005) Knowledge about osteoporosis: assessment, correlates and outcomes. Osteoporos Int 16:115–127PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Brenneman SK, Blau EM, Chen Y et al (2002) Validation of a patient questionnaire, ‘Osteoporosis and You’, designed to assess osteoporosis-related attitudes, knowledge and behavior [abstract]. J Bone Miner Res 17 [Suppl 1]:S466 Brenneman SK, Blau EM, Chen Y et al (2002) Validation of a patient questionnaire, ‘Osteoporosis and You’, designed to assess osteoporosis-related attitudes, knowledge and behavior [abstract]. J Bone Miner Res 17 [Suppl 1]:S466
5.
go back to reference Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC et al (2000) Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty. New Engl J Med 342:1016–1022PubMedCrossRef Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC et al (2000) Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty. New Engl J Med 342:1016–1022PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Hawker GA (2005) Fracture prevalence and treatment with bone-sparing agents: are there urban-rural differences? A population based study in Ontario, Canada. J Rheumatol 32:550–558PubMed Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Hawker GA (2005) Fracture prevalence and treatment with bone-sparing agents: are there urban-rural differences? A population based study in Ontario, Canada. J Rheumatol 32:550–558PubMed
7.
go back to reference Cadarette SM, Beaton DE, Gignac MAM et al (2006) Inequities in access to osteoporosis investigation and treatment among older community-dwelling women in Ontario, Canada [abstract]. J Bone Miner Res 21 [Suppl 1]:S273 Cadarette SM, Beaton DE, Gignac MAM et al (2006) Inequities in access to osteoporosis investigation and treatment among older community-dwelling women in Ontario, Canada [abstract]. J Bone Miner Res 21 [Suppl 1]:S273
8.
go back to reference Burgener M, Arnold M, Katz JN et al (2005) Older adults’ knowledge and beliefs about osteoporosis: results of semistructured interviews used for the development of educational materials. J Rheumatol 32:673–677PubMed Burgener M, Arnold M, Katz JN et al (2005) Older adults’ knowledge and beliefs about osteoporosis: results of semistructured interviews used for the development of educational materials. J Rheumatol 32:673–677PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kim K, Horan M, Gendler P (1991) Osteoporosis Health Belief Scale. Grand Valley State University, Allendale Kim K, Horan M, Gendler P (1991) Osteoporosis Health Belief Scale. Grand Valley State University, Allendale
10.
go back to reference Cadarette SM, Beaton DE, Hawker GA (2004) Osteoporosis Health Belief Scale: minor changes were required after telephone administration among women. J Clin Epidemiol 57:154–166PubMedCrossRef Cadarette SM, Beaton DE, Hawker GA (2004) Osteoporosis Health Belief Scale: minor changes were required after telephone administration among women. J Clin Epidemiol 57:154–166PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kim K, Horan M, Gendler P (1991) Osteoporosis Knowledge Test. Grand Valley State University, Allendale Kim K, Horan M, Gendler P (1991) Osteoporosis Knowledge Test. Grand Valley State University, Allendale
12.
go back to reference Winzenberg TM, Oldenburg B, Frendin S et al (2003) The design of a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure osteoporosis knowledge in women: the Osteoporosis Knowledge Assessment Tool (OKAT). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 4:17PubMedCrossRef Winzenberg TM, Oldenburg B, Frendin S et al (2003) The design of a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure osteoporosis knowledge in women: the Osteoporosis Knowledge Assessment Tool (OKAT). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 4:17PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, Toronto Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, Toronto
14.
go back to reference Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1981–2005) PRELIS. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1981–2005) PRELIS. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood
15.
go back to reference Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL et al (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL et al (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
16.
go back to reference Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (2005) LISREL. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (2005) LISREL. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood
17.
go back to reference Hatcher L (1994) A step-by-step approach to using the SAS System for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute, Cary Hatcher L (1994) A step-by-step approach to using the SAS System for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute, Cary
18.
go back to reference Kline RB (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press, New York Kline RB (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press, New York
19.
go back to reference DeVellis RF (2003) Scale development: theory and applications. Sage, Thousand Oaks DeVellis RF (2003) Scale development: theory and applications. Sage, Thousand Oaks
20.
go back to reference Solomon DH, Finkelstein JS, Polinski JM et al (2006) A randomized controlled trial of mailed osteoporosis education to older adults. Osteoporos Int 17:760–767PubMedCrossRef Solomon DH, Finkelstein JS, Polinski JM et al (2006) A randomized controlled trial of mailed osteoporosis education to older adults. Osteoporos Int 17:760–767PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wilkins K (2003) Social support and mortality in seniors. Health Rep 14:21–34PubMed Wilkins K (2003) Social support and mortality in seniors. Health Rep 14:21–34PubMed
22.
go back to reference Wilkins K, Park E (1996) Chronic conditions, physical limitations and dependency among seniors living in the community. Health Rep 8:7–15PubMed Wilkins K, Park E (1996) Chronic conditions, physical limitations and dependency among seniors living in the community. Health Rep 8:7–15PubMed
23.
go back to reference Statistics Canada (1999) Health among older adults. Health Rep 11:47–61 Statistics Canada (1999) Health among older adults. Health Rep 11:47–61
Metadata
Title
Psychometric properties of the “Osteoporosis and You” questionnaire: osteoporosis knowledge deficits among older community-dwelling women
Authors
S. M. Cadarette
M. A. M. Gignac
D. E. Beaton
S. B. Jaglal
G. A. Hawker
Publication date
01-07-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 7/2007
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0326-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2007

Osteoporosis International 7/2007 Go to the issue