Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 12/2005

01-12-2005 | Original Article

Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice

Authors: A. El Maghraoui, A. A. Do Santos Zounon, I. Jroundi, A. Nouijai, M. Ghazi, L. Achemlal, A. Bezza, M. A. Tazi, R. Abouqual

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 12/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements are frequently performed repeatedly for each patient. Subsequent BMD measurements allow reproducibility to be assessed. Previous studies have suggested that reproducibility may be influenced by age and clinical status. The purpose of the study was to examine the reproducibility of BMD by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to investigate the practical value of different measures of reproducibility in three distinct groups of subjects: healthy young volunteers, postmenopausal women and patients with chronic rheumatic diseases. Two hundred twenty-two subjects underwent two subsequent BMD measurements of the spine and hip. There were 60 young healthy subjects, 102 postmenopausal women and 60 patients with chronic rheumatic diseases (33 rheumatoid arthritis, 10 ankylosing spondylitis and 10 other systemic diseases). Forty-five patients (75%) among the third group were receiving corticosteroids. Reproducibility was expressed as the smallest detectable difference (SDD), coefficient of variation (CV), least significant change (LSC) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Sources of variation were investigated by linear regression analysis. The median interval between measurements was 0 days (range 0–7). The mean difference (SD) between the measurements (g/cm2) was −0.0001 (±0.003) and −0.0004 (±0.002) at L1-L4 and the total hip, respectively. At L1-L4 and the total hip, SDD (g/cm2) was ±0.04 and ±0.02, CV (%) was 2.02 and 1.29, and LSC (%) 5.60 and 3.56, respectively. The ICC at the spine and hip was 0.99 and 0.99, respectively. Only a minimal difference existed between the groups. Reproducibility in the three groups studied was good. In a repeated DXA scan, a BMD change, the least significant change (LSC) or the SDD should be regarded as significant. Use of the SDD is preferable to use of the CV and LSC because of its independence from BMD and its expression in absolute units. Expressed as SDD, a BMD change of at least ±0.04 g/cm2 at L1-L4 and ±0.02 g/cm2 at the total hip should be considered significant. This reproducibility seems independent from age and clinical status and improved in the hips by measuring the dual femur.
Literature
1.
go back to reference El Maghraoui A, Koumba BA, Jroundi I, Achemlal L, Bezza A, Tazi MA (2005) Epidemiology of hip fractures in 2002 in Rabat, Morocco. Osteoporos Int 16:597–602. DOI 10.1007/s00198–004–1729–8CrossRef El Maghraoui A, Koumba BA, Jroundi I, Achemlal L, Bezza A, Tazi MA (2005) Epidemiology of hip fractures in 2002 in Rabat, Morocco. Osteoporos Int 16:597–602. DOI 10.1007/s00198–004–1729–8CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bono CM, Einhorn TA (2003) Overview of osteoporosis: pathophysiology and determinants of bone strength. Eur Spine J 12 [Suppl 2]:S90–S96 Bono CM, Einhorn TA (2003) Overview of osteoporosis: pathophysiology and determinants of bone strength. Eur Spine J 12 [Suppl 2]:S90–S96
3.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Jonsson B, De Laet C, Dawson A (2000) Risk of hip fracture according to the World Health Organization criteria for osteopenia and osteoporosis. Bone 27:585–590PubMed Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Jonsson B, De Laet C, Dawson A (2000) Risk of hip fracture according to the World Health Organization criteria for osteopenia and osteoporosis. Bone 27:585–590PubMed
4.
go back to reference Yeap SS, Hosking DJ (2002) Management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Rheumatology 41:1088–1094PubMed Yeap SS, Hosking DJ (2002) Management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Rheumatology 41:1088–1094PubMed
5.
go back to reference Maricic M, Gluck O (2004) Densitometry in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 7:359–363PubMed Maricic M, Gluck O (2004) Densitometry in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 7:359–363PubMed
6.
go back to reference El Maghraoui A (2004) Corticosteroid induced osteoporosis. Press Med 33:1213–1217 El Maghraoui A (2004) Corticosteroid induced osteoporosis. Press Med 33:1213–1217
7.
go back to reference Phillipov G, Seaborn CJ, Phillips PJ (2001) Reproducibility of DXA: potential impact on serial measurements and misclassification of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 12:49–54PubMed Phillipov G, Seaborn CJ, Phillips PJ (2001) Reproducibility of DXA: potential impact on serial measurements and misclassification of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 12:49–54PubMed
8.
go back to reference Nguyen TV, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (1997) Sources of variability in bone mineral density measurements: implications for study design and analysis of bone loss. J Bone Miner Res 12:124–135PubMed Nguyen TV, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (1997) Sources of variability in bone mineral density measurements: implications for study design and analysis of bone loss. J Bone Miner Res 12:124–135PubMed
9.
go back to reference Lodder MC, Lems WF, Ader HJ, Marthinsen AE, van Coeverden SCCM, Lips P et al (2004) Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurement in daily practice. Ann Rheum Dis 63:285–289PubMed Lodder MC, Lems WF, Ader HJ, Marthinsen AE, van Coeverden SCCM, Lips P et al (2004) Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurement in daily practice. Ann Rheum Dis 63:285–289PubMed
10.
go back to reference Maggio D, McCloskey EV, Camilli L, Cenci S, Cherubini A, Kanis JA et al (1998) Short-term reproducibility of proximal femur bone mineral density in the elderly. Calcif Tissue Int 63:296–299PubMed Maggio D, McCloskey EV, Camilli L, Cenci S, Cherubini A, Kanis JA et al (1998) Short-term reproducibility of proximal femur bone mineral density in the elderly. Calcif Tissue Int 63:296–299PubMed
11.
go back to reference Ravaud P, Reny JL, Giraudeau B, Porcher R, Dougados M, Roux C (1999) Individual smallest detectable difference in bone mineral density measurements. J Bone Miner Res 14:1449–1456PubMed Ravaud P, Reny JL, Giraudeau B, Porcher R, Dougados M, Roux C (1999) Individual smallest detectable difference in bone mineral density measurements. J Bone Miner Res 14:1449–1456PubMed
12.
go back to reference Fuleihan GE, Testa MA, Angell JE, Porrino N, Leboff MS (1995) Reproducibility of DXA absorptiometry: a model for bone loss estimates. J Bone Miner Res 10:1004–1014PubMed Fuleihan GE, Testa MA, Angell JE, Porrino N, Leboff MS (1995) Reproducibility of DXA absorptiometry: a model for bone loss estimates. J Bone Miner Res 10:1004–1014PubMed
13.
go back to reference Rozenberg S, Vandromme J, Neve J, Aguilera A, Muregancuro A, Peretz A et al (1995) Precision and accuracy of in vivo bone mineral measurement in rats using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 5:47–53PubMed Rozenberg S, Vandromme J, Neve J, Aguilera A, Muregancuro A, Peretz A et al (1995) Precision and accuracy of in vivo bone mineral measurement in rats using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 5:47–53PubMed
14.
go back to reference Nguyen TV, Eisman JA (2000) Assessment of significant change in BMD: a new approach. J Bone Miner Res 15:369–372PubMed Nguyen TV, Eisman JA (2000) Assessment of significant change in BMD: a new approach. J Bone Miner Res 15:369–372PubMed
15.
go back to reference Bland J, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between methods of clinical measurement. Lancet i:307–310 Bland J, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between methods of clinical measurement. Lancet i:307–310
16.
go back to reference Gluer CC (1999) Monitoring skeletal changes by radiological techniques. J Bone Miner Res 14:1952–1962PubMed Gluer CC (1999) Monitoring skeletal changes by radiological techniques. J Bone Miner Res 14:1952–1962PubMed
17.
go back to reference Johnson SL, Petkov VI, Williams MI, Via PS, Adler RA (2004) Improving osteoporosis management in patients with fractures. Osteoporos Int Johnson SL, Petkov VI, Williams MI, Via PS, Adler RA (2004) Improving osteoporosis management in patients with fractures. Osteoporos Int
18.
go back to reference Prevention and management of osteoporosis. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2003; 921:1–164 Prevention and management of osteoporosis. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2003; 921:1–164
19.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Devogelaer JP, Gennari C (1996) Practical guide for the use of bone mineral measurements in the assessment of treatment of osteoporosis: a position paper of the European foundation for osteoporosis and bone disease. The Scientific Advisory Board and the Board of National Societies. Osteoporos Int 6:256–261PubMed Kanis JA, Devogelaer JP, Gennari C (1996) Practical guide for the use of bone mineral measurements in the assessment of treatment of osteoporosis: a position paper of the European foundation for osteoporosis and bone disease. The Scientific Advisory Board and the Board of National Societies. Osteoporos Int 6:256–261PubMed
20.
go back to reference El Maghraoui A, Borderie D, Edouard R, Roux C, Dougados M (1999) Osteoporosis, body composition and bone turnover in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 26:2205–2209PubMed El Maghraoui A, Borderie D, Edouard R, Roux C, Dougados M (1999) Osteoporosis, body composition and bone turnover in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 26:2205–2209PubMed
21.
go back to reference El Maghraoui A (2004) Osteoporosis and ankylosing spondyltis. Joint Bone Spine 71:573–578 El Maghraoui A (2004) Osteoporosis and ankylosing spondyltis. Joint Bone Spine 71:573–578
22.
go back to reference Eastell R (1996) Assessment of bone density and bone loss. Osteoporos Int [Suppl] 6:3–5 Eastell R (1996) Assessment of bone density and bone loss. Osteoporos Int [Suppl] 6:3–5
Metadata
Title
Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice
Authors
A. El Maghraoui
A. A. Do Santos Zounon
I. Jroundi
A. Nouijai
M. Ghazi
L. Achemlal
A. Bezza
M. A. Tazi
R. Abouqual
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 12/2005
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1916-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2005

Osteoporosis International 12/2005 Go to the issue