Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 7/2005

01-07-2005 | Original Article

An osteoporosis screening tool for Chinese men

Authors: H. S. Lynn, E. M. C. Lau, S. Y. S. Wong, A. W. L. Hong

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 7/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Several osteoporosis risk instruments have been proposed to select women for bone densitometry, but no validated instruments are currently available for men. This study aims to address this deficiency by developing and validating a Male Osteoporosis Screening Tool (MOST) for Chinese men. Two thousand ambulatory men, aged 65 and above, were recruited from the general community in Hong Kong, and a cohort of 1,970 men with valid total hip and lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements was included in the current analysis. A 60% random sample was selected as the training sample for developing the screening tool, and the remaining 40% constituted the validation sample. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to identify the simplest combination of risk factors to be included in the screening tool for predicting osteoporosis at the femoral neck, total hip, or lumbar spine. Body weight and quantitative ultrasound index (QUI) were found to contribute significantly to the area under the ROC curve (AUC), yielding an AUC of 0.823 in the training sample. The resulting MOST had a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 46% when using a cutoff score of 3. MOST had an AUC of 0.839 in the validation sample. The risk of osteoporosis was 1% among those with MOST scores ≤2, but 72% among those with MOST scores >7. Using a cutoff of 3, the negative predictive value was 97.5% which suggests that the 42% with MOST scores ≤3 may be accurately screened out as being without osteoporosis, thus saving two fifths of our DXA resources. The positive predictive value was 72% when using a cutoff of 7, implying that MOST cannot replace DXA for case-finding purposes. Nevertheless, for resource allocation and patient satisfaction, it is prudent and economical to offer DXA screening first to the 6% with MOST scores >7.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Riggs BL, Melton LJ (1995) The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone 17:S505–S511CrossRef Riggs BL, Melton LJ (1995) The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone 17:S505–S511CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Melton LJ, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C, Lane AW, Riggs BL (1992) Perspective: how many women have osteoporosis? J Bone Miner Res 7:1005–1010PubMed Melton LJ, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C, Lane AW, Riggs BL (1992) Perspective: how many women have osteoporosis? J Bone Miner Res 7:1005–1010PubMed
3.
go back to reference Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ (1992) Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 2:285–289PubMed Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ (1992) Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 2:285–289PubMed
4.
go back to reference Lippuner K, von Overbeck J, Perrelet R, Bosshard H, Jaeger P. Incidence and direct medical costs of hospitalizations due to osteoporotic fractures in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 1997;7:414–425 Lippuner K, von Overbeck J, Perrelet R, Bosshard H, Jaeger P. Incidence and direct medical costs of hospitalizations due to osteoporotic fractures in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 1997;7:414–425
5.
go back to reference National Osteoporosis Foundation (1998) Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Osteoporos Int 8:S7–S80 National Osteoporosis Foundation (1998) Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Osteoporos Int 8:S7–S80
6.
go back to reference Brown JP, Josse RJ for the Scientific Advisory Council, Osteoporosis Society of Canada (2002) 2002 clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in CMAJ 167:S1–S34 Brown JP, Josse RJ for the Scientific Advisory Council, Osteoporosis Society of Canada (2002) 2002 clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in CMAJ 167:S1–S34
7.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Delmas P, Buckhardt P, Cooper C, Torgerson D (1997) Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease. Osteoporos Int 7(4):390–406PubMed Kanis JA, Delmas P, Buckhardt P, Cooper C, Torgerson D (1997) Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease. Osteoporos Int 7(4):390–406PubMed
8.
go back to reference Meunier PJ, Delmas PD, Eastell R, McClung MR, Papapoulos S, Rizzoli R, Seeman E, Wasnich RD (1999) Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: clinical guidelines. International Committee for Osteoporosis Clinical Guidelines. Clin Ther 21(6):1025–1044CrossRefPubMed Meunier PJ, Delmas PD, Eastell R, McClung MR, Papapoulos S, Rizzoli R, Seeman E, Wasnich RD (1999) Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: clinical guidelines. International Committee for Osteoporosis Clinical Guidelines. Clin Ther 21(6):1025–1044CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Campion JM, Maricic MJ (2003) Osteoporosis in men. Am Fam Physician 67(7):1521–1526PubMed Campion JM, Maricic MJ (2003) Osteoporosis in men. Am Fam Physician 67(7):1521–1526PubMed
10.
go back to reference Lydick E, Cook K, Turpin J, Melton M, Stine R, Byrnes C (1998) Development and validation of a simple questionnaire to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density. Am J Manag Care 4(1):37–48PubMed Lydick E, Cook K, Turpin J, Melton M, Stine R, Byrnes C (1998) Development and validation of a simple questionnaire to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density. Am J Manag Care 4(1):37–48PubMed
11.
go back to reference Koh LK, Sedrine WB, Torralba TP, Kung A, Fujiwara S, Chan SP, Huang QR, Rajatanavin R, Tsai KS, Park HM, Reginster JY (2001) A simple tool to identify Asian women at increased risk of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) Research Group. Osteoporos Int 12(8):699–705CrossRefPubMed Koh LK, Sedrine WB, Torralba TP, Kung A, Fujiwara S, Chan SP, Huang QR, Rajatanavin R, Tsai KS, Park HM, Reginster JY (2001) A simple tool to identify Asian women at increased risk of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) Research Group. Osteoporos Int 12(8):699–705CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Kreiger N, McIsaac WJ, Darlington GA, Tu JV (2000) Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry. CMAJ 162(9):1289–1294PubMed Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Kreiger N, McIsaac WJ, Darlington GA, Tu JV (2000) Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry. CMAJ 162(9):1289–1294PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hadji P, Hars O, Wüster C et al (1999) Stiffness index identifies patients with osteoporotic fractures better than ultrasound velocity or attenuation alone. Maturitas 31:221–226CrossRefPubMed Hadji P, Hars O, Wüster C et al (1999) Stiffness index identifies patients with osteoporotic fractures better than ultrasound velocity or attenuation alone. Maturitas 31:221–226CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mikhail MB, Flaster E, Aloia JF (1999) Stiffness in discrimination of patients with vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 9:24–28CrossRefPubMed Mikhail MB, Flaster E, Aloia JF (1999) Stiffness in discrimination of patients with vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 9:24–28CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pepe MS (2000) Receiver operating characteristic methodology. J Am Stat Assoc 95:308–311 Pepe MS (2000) Receiver operating characteristic methodology. J Am Stat Assoc 95:308–311
16.
go back to reference Looker AC, Orwoll ES, Johnston CC Jr et al (1997) Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older US adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 12:1761–1768PubMed Looker AC, Orwoll ES, Johnston CC Jr et al (1997) Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older US adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 12:1761–1768PubMed
17.
go back to reference Tenenhouse A, Joseph L, Kreiger N et al (2000) Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporos Int 11:897–904 Tenenhouse A, Joseph L, Kreiger N et al (2000) Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporos Int 11:897–904
18.
go back to reference Chan WP, Liu JF, Chi WL (2004) Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and proximal femur in population-based routine health examinations of healthy Asians. Acta Radiologica 45:59–64CrossRefPubMed Chan WP, Liu JF, Chi WL (2004) Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and proximal femur in population-based routine health examinations of healthy Asians. Acta Radiologica 45:59–64CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Murray TM, McIsaac WJ, Joseph L, Brown JP (2001) Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study: evaluation of decision rules for referring women for bone densitometry by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. JAMA 286(1):57–63CrossRefPubMed Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Murray TM, McIsaac WJ, Joseph L, Brown JP (2001) Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study: evaluation of decision rules for referring women for bone densitometry by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. JAMA 286(1):57–63CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Cadarette SM, McIsaac WJ, Hawker GA, Jaakkimainen L, Culbert A, Zarifa G, Ola E, Jaglal SB (2004) The validity of decision rules for selecting women with primary osteoporosis for bone mineral density testing. Osteoporos Int 16(5):361–366 Cadarette SM, McIsaac WJ, Hawker GA, Jaakkimainen L, Culbert A, Zarifa G, Ola E, Jaglal SB (2004) The validity of decision rules for selecting women with primary osteoporosis for bone mineral density testing. Osteoporos Int 16(5):361–366
21.
go back to reference Adler RA, Tran MT, Petkov VI (2003) Performance of the Osteoporosis Self-assessment Screening Tool for osteoporosis in American men. Mayo Clin Proc 78(6):723–727PubMed Adler RA, Tran MT, Petkov VI (2003) Performance of the Osteoporosis Self-assessment Screening Tool for osteoporosis in American men. Mayo Clin Proc 78(6):723–727PubMed
22.
go back to reference Khaw KT, Reeve J, Luben R, Bingham S, Welch A, Wareham N, Oakes S, Day N (2004) Prediction of total and hip fracture risk in men and women by quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. Lancet 363(9404):197–202CrossRefPubMed Khaw KT, Reeve J, Luben R, Bingham S, Welch A, Wareham N, Oakes S, Day N (2004) Prediction of total and hip fracture risk in men and women by quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. Lancet 363(9404):197–202CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Cauley JA, Vogt TM, Ensrud KE, Genant HK, Black DM (1997) Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch Intern Med 157(6):629–634CrossRefPubMed Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Cauley JA, Vogt TM, Ensrud KE, Genant HK, Black DM (1997) Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch Intern Med 157(6):629–634CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I (2000) Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound? Osteoporos Int 11(4):321–330CrossRefPubMed Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I (2000) Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound? Osteoporos Int 11(4):321–330CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Forsen L, Sogaard AJ, Meyer HE, Edna T, Kopjar B (1999) Survival after hip fracture: short- and long-term excess mortality according to age and gender. Osteoporos Int 10(1):73–78CrossRefPubMed Forsen L, Sogaard AJ, Meyer HE, Edna T, Kopjar B (1999) Survival after hip fracture: short- and long-term excess mortality according to age and gender. Osteoporos Int 10(1):73–78CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Adler RA, Funkhouser HL, Petkov VI, Elmore BL, Via PS, McMurtry CT, Adera T (2003) Osteoporosis in pulmonary clinic patients: does point-of-care screening predict central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry? Chest 123(6):2012–2018CrossRefPubMed Adler RA, Funkhouser HL, Petkov VI, Elmore BL, Via PS, McMurtry CT, Adera T (2003) Osteoporosis in pulmonary clinic patients: does point-of-care screening predict central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry? Chest 123(6):2012–2018CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Dargent-Molina P, Piault S, Breart G (2003) A comparison of different screening strategies to identify elderly women at high risk of hip fracture: results from the EPIDOS prospective study. Osteoporos Int 14(12):969–977CrossRefPubMed Dargent-Molina P, Piault S, Breart G (2003) A comparison of different screening strategies to identify elderly women at high risk of hip fracture: results from the EPIDOS prospective study. Osteoporos Int 14(12):969–977CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Hui Y (2002) Osteoporosis: should there be a screening programme in Hong Kong? Hong Kong Med J 8(4):270–277PubMed Hui Y (2002) Osteoporosis: should there be a screening programme in Hong Kong? Hong Kong Med J 8(4):270–277PubMed
Metadata
Title
An osteoporosis screening tool for Chinese men
Authors
H. S. Lynn
E. M. C. Lau
S. Y. S. Wong
A. W. L. Hong
Publication date
01-07-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 7/2005
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1768-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2005

Osteoporosis International 7/2005 Go to the issue