Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 7/2005

01-07-2005 | Original Article

Image resolution and magnification using a cone beam densitometer: optimizing data acquisition for hip morphometric analysis

Authors: V. Boudousq, D. Mariano Goulart, J. M. Dinten, C. Caderas de Kerleau, E. Thomas, O. Mares, P. O. Kotzki

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 7/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) is a primary determinant of hip fracture risk. However, other factors, notably the femoral geometry, can influence hip fracture risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of a new cone beam densitometer, the DMS Lexxos, in order to visualise femoral morphometry. Resolution, magnification and distortion were assessed in vitro using a line pair test pattern and a matrix test object. Results were given in comparison with currently available systems: the Hologic Discovery A and the Lunar Prodigy densitometers. The DMS Lexxos image resolution was the same in the longitudinal and transversal directions evaluated between 1.4 and 0.5 line pairs/mm (lps/mm) for an attenuation varying from 25 to 325 mm of Perplex. The longitudinal resolution was evaluated between 0.9 and 0.5 lps/mm with the Hologic Discovery densitometer, and inferior to 0.5 with the Lunar Prodigy; as for transversal resolution, it varied from 0.63 to 0.5 lps/mm and from 0.6 to inferior 0.5 lps/mm, respectively. The image was isotropic without magnification with the GE-Lunar Prodigy, whereas there was only a transversal magnification with the Hologic Discovery device. The magnification was about 1.17% cm−1 in the two directions, while increasing the distance of the phantom above the examination table with the Lexxos. This magnification was isotropic without distortion. The magnification could be evaluated from two images taken before and after translation of the C-arm, and a magnification correction could be applied. This method was applied to a phantom and to a human cadaver femoral bone.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Faulkner KG, Cumming SR, Black D, Palermo L, Glüer CC, Genant HK (1993) Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 11:1211–1217 Faulkner KG, Cumming SR, Black D, Palermo L, Glüer CC, Genant HK (1993) Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 11:1211–1217
2.
go back to reference Cumming SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC et al. (1990) Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. JAMA 263:655–668 Cumming SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC et al. (1990) Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. JAMA 263:655–668
3.
go back to reference Bergot C, Bousson V, Meunier A et al. (2002) Hip fracture risk and proximal femur geometry from DXA scans. Osteoporos Int 13:542–550CrossRefPubMed Bergot C, Bousson V, Meunier A et al. (2002) Hip fracture risk and proximal femur geometry from DXA scans. Osteoporos Int 13:542–550CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ferris BD, Kennedy C, Bhamra M, Muirhead-allwood W (1989) Morphology of the femur in proximal femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 71:475–477 Ferris BD, Kennedy C, Bhamra M, Muirhead-allwood W (1989) Morphology of the femur in proximal femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 71:475–477
6.
go back to reference Karlson KM, Serno I, Obrant KJ, Redlund-Johnell I, Johnell O (1996) Femoral neck geometry and radiographic signs of osteoporosis as predictors of hip fracture. Bone 18:327–330CrossRefPubMed Karlson KM, Serno I, Obrant KJ, Redlund-Johnell I, Johnell O (1996) Femoral neck geometry and radiographic signs of osteoporosis as predictors of hip fracture. Bone 18:327–330CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Michelotti J, Clark J (1999) Femoral neck Length and hip fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 10:1714–1720 Michelotti J, Clark J (1999) Femoral neck Length and hip fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 10:1714–1720
8.
go back to reference Lang TF, Keyak JH, Heitz MW, Augat P, Lu Y, Mathur A, Genant HK (1997) Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength. Bone 21:101–108CrossRefPubMed Lang TF, Keyak JH, Heitz MW, Augat P, Lu Y, Mathur A, Genant HK (1997) Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength. Bone 21:101–108CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Cody DD, Nahigian KK, Dividine G, Ciarelli J, Sard B (1993) Does bone density or bone shape discriminate between subjects at high and low risk of hip fracture? Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, p 19 Cody DD, Nahigian KK, Dividine G, Ciarelli J, Sard B (1993) Does bone density or bone shape discriminate between subjects at high and low risk of hip fracture? Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, p 19
10.
go back to reference Gomez Alonso C, Diaz Curiel M, Hawkins Carranza F, Pérez Cano R,Diez Perez A et al. (2000) Femoral bone mineral density, neck-shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fracture in men and women. Osteoporos Int 11:714–720CrossRefPubMed Gomez Alonso C, Diaz Curiel M, Hawkins Carranza F, Pérez Cano R,Diez Perez A et al. (2000) Femoral bone mineral density, neck-shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fracture in men and women. Osteoporos Int 11:714–720CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Faulkner KG, McClung M, Cummings SR (1994) Automated evaluation of hip axis length for predicting hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res 19:1065–1070 Faulkner KG, McClung M, Cummings SR (1994) Automated evaluation of hip axis length for predicting hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res 19:1065–1070
12.
go back to reference Blake GM, Parker JC, Buxton FM, Fogelman I (1993) Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans. Br J Radiol 66:902–906 Blake GM, Parker JC, Buxton FM, Fogelman I (1993) Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans. Br J Radiol 66:902–906
13.
go back to reference Pocock NA, Noakesz KA, Majerovic Ygriffiths MR (1997) Magnification error of femoral geometry using fan beam densitometers. Calcif Tissue Int 60:8–10CrossRefPubMed Pocock NA, Noakesz KA, Majerovic Ygriffiths MR (1997) Magnification error of femoral geometry using fan beam densitometers. Calcif Tissue Int 60:8–10CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mazess RB, Hanson JA, Payne R, Nord R, Wilson M (2000) Axial and total-body bone densitometry using a narrow-angle fan beam. Osteoporos Int 11:158–166PubMed Mazess RB, Hanson JA, Payne R, Nord R, Wilson M (2000) Axial and total-body bone densitometry using a narrow-angle fan beam. Osteoporos Int 11:158–166PubMed
15.
go back to reference Faulkner KG, Genant HG, McClung M (1995) Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA scans. Calcif Tissue Int 56:26–31PubMed Faulkner KG, Genant HG, McClung M (1995) Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA scans. Calcif Tissue Int 56:26–31PubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Barthe N, Braillon P, Ducassou D, Basse-Cathalinat B (1997) Comparison of the two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and 4500/A). Br J Radiol 70:728–739 Barthe N, Braillon P, Ducassou D, Basse-Cathalinat B (1997) Comparison of the two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and 4500/A). Br J Radiol 70:728–739
18.
go back to reference Dinten JM, Robert-Coutant C, Darboux M (2001) Dual-energy X-rays absorptiometry using a 2D digital radiography detector. Application to bone densitometry. Proc SPIE 4320:459–468CrossRef Dinten JM, Robert-Coutant C, Darboux M (2001) Dual-energy X-rays absorptiometry using a 2D digital radiography detector. Application to bone densitometry. Proc SPIE 4320:459–468CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Griffiths MR, Noakes KA, Pocok NA (1997) Correcting the magnification error of fan beam densitometers. J Bone Miner Res 12:119–123PubMed Griffiths MR, Noakes KA, Pocok NA (1997) Correcting the magnification error of fan beam densitometers. J Bone Miner Res 12:119–123PubMed
Metadata
Title
Image resolution and magnification using a cone beam densitometer: optimizing data acquisition for hip morphometric analysis
Authors
V. Boudousq
D. Mariano Goulart
J. M. Dinten
C. Caderas de Kerleau
E. Thomas
O. Mares
P. O. Kotzki
Publication date
01-07-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 7/2005
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1751-x

Other articles of this Issue 7/2005

Osteoporosis International 7/2005 Go to the issue