Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 3/2003

01-03-2003 | Original Article

Total dose incurred by patients and staff from BMD measurement using a new 2D digital bone densitometer

Authors: V. Boudousq, P. O. Kotzki, J. M. Dinten, C. Barrau, C. Robert-Coutant, E. Thomas, D. Mariano Goulart

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 3/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a widely used and precise technique for non-invasive assessment of bone mineral density. The DXA systems have evolved from pencil X-ray beam (single detector) to fan beam (linear array detector) and recently cone beam densitometers (bi-dimensional detector), allowing for an examination to occur without any scanning and with a short acquisition time. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient and staff dose from a new cone beam densitometer, the DMS Lexxos. Measurements were performed on a DMS Lexxos bone densitometer prototype. An anthropomorphic phantom and thermoluminescent dosimeters were used to evaluate the effective dose. Ionization chambers and electronic personal dosimeters were used to evaluate the staff dose. The effective dose is 8.4 µSv for an anteroposterior spine examination and 4.8 µSv for a femoral neck in standard mode. The averaged scattered dose rate (ambient dose equivalent) at 1 m from the beam is evaluated at 226 µSv/h. Assuming six patients per hour with two views per patient, the time averaged dose rate is evaluated at 2.9 µSv/h. By the personal dosimeter, the staff dose (Hp 10) at 1 m from the beam is evaluated at 0.23 µSv per examination. For one examination, patient and staff dose from this new technology remains low: in the same range as the fan-beam densitometer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference ICRP Publication 60 (1990) Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 21:11–21 ICRP Publication 60 (1990) Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 21:11–21
2.
go back to reference Njeh CF, Fuerst T, Hans D, Blake GM, Genant HK (1999) Radiation exposure in bone mineral density assessment. Appl Radiat Isot 50:215–236 Njeh CF, Fuerst T, Hans D, Blake GM, Genant HK (1999) Radiation exposure in bone mineral density assessment. Appl Radiat Isot 50:215–236
3.
go back to reference Dinten JM, Robert-Coutant C, Darboux M (2001) Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using a 2D digital radiography detector. Application to bone densitometry. Proc SPIE 4320:459–468 Dinten JM, Robert-Coutant C, Darboux M (2001) Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using a 2D digital radiography detector. Application to bone densitometry. Proc SPIE 4320:459–468
4.
go back to reference Volle JM, Dinten JM (1998) Physical model based restoration of mammographies. Proc SPIE 3336:641–650 Volle JM, Dinten JM (1998) Physical model based restoration of mammographies. Proc SPIE 3336:641–650
5.
go back to reference ICRP Publication 23 (1975) Report of the task group on reference man. Pergamon Press, Oxford ICRP Publication 23 (1975) Report of the task group on reference man. Pergamon Press, Oxford
6.
go back to reference Wall BF, Harrisson RM, Spiers FW (1988) Patient dosimetry techniques in diagnostic radiology. The Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine. Report 53, IPSN, York Wall BF, Harrisson RM, Spiers FW (1988) Patient dosimetry techniques in diagnostic radiology. The Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine. Report 53, IPSN, York
7.
go back to reference Shrimpton PC, Wall BF, Fisher ES (1981) The tissue-equivalence of the Aldo Rando anthropomorphic phantom for X-rays of diagnostic qualities. Phys Med Biol 26:133–139 Shrimpton PC, Wall BF, Fisher ES (1981) The tissue-equivalence of the Aldo Rando anthropomorphic phantom for X-rays of diagnostic qualities. Phys Med Biol 26:133–139
8.
go back to reference Huda W, Sandison GA (1984) Estimation of mean organ doses in diagnostic radiology from Rando phantom measurements. Health Phys 47:463–467 Huda W, Sandison GA (1984) Estimation of mean organ doses in diagnostic radiology from Rando phantom measurements. Health Phys 47:463–467
9.
go back to reference Golikov VY, Nikitin VV (1989) Estimation of the mean organ doses and the effective dose equivalent from Rando Phantom measurements. Health Phys 56:111–115 Golikov VY, Nikitin VV (1989) Estimation of the mean organ doses and the effective dose equivalent from Rando Phantom measurements. Health Phys 56:111–115
10.
go back to reference ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and measurements) report 47 (1992) Measurements of dose equivalents from external photons and electron beams. ICRU, Bethesda, Maryland ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and measurements) report 47 (1992) Measurements of dose equivalents from external photons and electron beams. ICRU, Bethesda, Maryland
11.
go back to reference ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and measurements) report 51 (1993) Quantities and units in radiation protecton dosimetry. ICRU, Bethesda, Maryland ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and measurements) report 51 (1993) Quantities and units in radiation protecton dosimetry. ICRU, Bethesda, Maryland
12.
go back to reference ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and measurements) report 57 (1998) Conversion coefficients for use in radiological Protection against external radiation. ICRU, Bethesda, Maryland ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and measurements) report 57 (1998) Conversion coefficients for use in radiological Protection against external radiation. ICRU, Bethesda, Maryland
13.
go back to reference Patel R, Lewis MK, Blake GM, Batchelor S, Potts E, Smith IG, Fogelman I (1996) New generation DXA scanners increase dose to patients and staff. In: Current research in osteoporosis and bone mineral measurement, vol 4. British Institute of Radiology, London, p 99 Patel R, Lewis MK, Blake GM, Batchelor S, Potts E, Smith IG, Fogelman I (1996) New generation DXA scanners increase dose to patients and staff. In: Current research in osteoporosis and bone mineral measurement, vol 4. British Institute of Radiology, London, p 99
14.
go back to reference Starritt HC, Elvins DM, Ring FJ (1996) Radiation dose and the Hologic Acclaim X-ray bone densitometer. In: Current research in osteoporosis and bone mineral measurement, vol 4. British Institute of Radiology, London, pp 99–100 Starritt HC, Elvins DM, Ring FJ (1996) Radiation dose and the Hologic Acclaim X-ray bone densitometer. In: Current research in osteoporosis and bone mineral measurement, vol 4. British Institute of Radiology, London, pp 99–100
15.
go back to reference Njeh CF, Apple K, Temperton DH, Boivin CM (1996) Radiological assessment of a new bone densitometer—the Lunar Expert. Br J Radiol 69:335–340 Njeh CF, Apple K, Temperton DH, Boivin CM (1996) Radiological assessment of a new bone densitometer—the Lunar Expert. Br J Radiol 69:335–340
16.
go back to reference Steel SA, Bakert AJ, Saunderson JR (1998) An assessment of the radiation dose to patients and staff from a Lunar Expert-XL fan beam densitometer. Physiol Meas 19:17–26 Steel SA, Bakert AJ, Saunderson JR (1998) An assessment of the radiation dose to patients and staff from a Lunar Expert-XL fan beam densitometer. Physiol Meas 19:17–26
17.
go back to reference Stewart SP, Milner D, Moore AC, Emery P et al. (1996) Preliminary report on the Lunar Expert-XL imaging densitometer: dosimetry, precision and cross calibration. In: Current research in osteoporosis and bone mineral measurement, vol 4. British Institute of Radiology, London, pp 101–102 Stewart SP, Milner D, Moore AC, Emery P et al. (1996) Preliminary report on the Lunar Expert-XL imaging densitometer: dosimetry, precision and cross calibration. In: Current research in osteoporosis and bone mineral measurement, vol 4. British Institute of Radiology, London, pp 101–102
18.
go back to reference Lewis MK, Blake GM, Fogelman I (1994) Patient dose in dual X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 4:11–15 Lewis MK, Blake GM, Fogelman I (1994) Patient dose in dual X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 4:11–15
19.
go back to reference Mazess RB, Hanson R, Payne R, Nord R, Wilson M (2000) Axial and total-body bone densitometry using a narrow-angle fan beam. Osteoporos Int 11:158–166 Mazess RB, Hanson R, Payne R, Nord R, Wilson M (2000) Axial and total-body bone densitometry using a narrow-angle fan beam. Osteoporos Int 11:158–166
20.
go back to reference Patel R, Blake GM, Batchelor S, Fogelman I (1996) Occupational dose to the radiographer in dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison of pencil-beam and fan-beam systems. Br J Radiol 69:539–543 Patel R, Blake GM, Batchelor S, Fogelman I (1996) Occupational dose to the radiographer in dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison of pencil-beam and fan-beam systems. Br J Radiol 69:539–543
21.
go back to reference Directive96/29/EURATOM du conseil du 13/05/96. Journal officiel des communautés européennes 29/06/96 FR, L159:1–18 Directive96/29/EURATOM du conseil du 13/05/96. Journal officiel des communautés européennes 29/06/96 FR, L159:1–18
Metadata
Title
Total dose incurred by patients and staff from BMD measurement using a new 2D digital bone densitometer
Authors
V. Boudousq
P. O. Kotzki
J. M. Dinten
C. Barrau
C. Robert-Coutant
E. Thomas
D. Mariano Goulart
Publication date
01-03-2003
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 3/2003
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-002-1359-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2003

Osteoporosis International 3/2003 Go to the issue