Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2022

Open Access 01-03-2022 | Original Article

Biomechanical integrity score of the female pelvic floor

Authors: Vladimir Egorov, Heather van Raalte, Peter Takacs, S. Abbas Shobeiri, Vincent Lucente, Lennox Hoyte

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 6/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and Hypothesis

The aim of this study is to develop and validate a new integral parameter, the Biomechanical Integrity score (BI-score), for the characterization of the female pelvic floor.

Methods

A total of 253 subjects with normal and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) conditions were included in the multi-site observational, case-control study; 125 subjects had normal pelvic floor conditions, and 128 subjects had POP stage II or higher. A Vaginal Tactile Imager (VTI) was used to acquire and automatically calculate 52 biomechanical parameters for eight VTI test procedures (probe insertion, elevation, rotation, Valsalva maneuver, voluntary muscle contractions in two planes, relaxation, and reflex contraction). Statistical methods were applied (t-test, correlation) to identify the VTI parameters sensitive to the pelvic conditions.

Results

Twenty-six parameters were identified as statistically sensitive to POP development. They were subdivided into five groups to characterize (1) tissue elasticity, (2) pelvic support, (3) pelvic muscle contraction, (4) involuntary muscle relaxation, and (5) pelvic muscle mobility. Every parameter was transformed to its standard deviation units against the patient age similar to T-score for bone density. Linear combinations with specified weights led to the composition of five component parameters for groups (1)–(5) and the BI-score in standard deviation units. The p-value for the BI-score has p = 4.3 × 10−31 for POP versus normal conditions. A reference BI-score curve against age for normal pelvic floor conditions was defined.

Conclusions

Quantitative transformations of the pelvic tissues, support structures, and functions under diseased conditions may be studied with the BI-score in future research and practical applications.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference The American College of Obstetricians (ACOG) and Gynecologists and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Pelvic organ prolapse. Practice Bulletin Number 185. Female Pelvic Med Reconstruct Surg. 2017;23(6):353–64. The American College of Obstetricians (ACOG) and Gynecologists and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Pelvic organ prolapse. Practice Bulletin Number 185. Female Pelvic Med Reconstruct Surg. 2017;23(6):353–64.
2.
go back to reference Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.CrossRef Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference de Arruda GT, Dos Santos HT, Virtuoso JF. Pelvic floor distress inventory (PFDI)-systematic review of measurement properties. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(10):2657–69.CrossRef de Arruda GT, Dos Santos HT, Virtuoso JF. Pelvic floor distress inventory (PFDI)-systematic review of measurement properties. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(10):2657–69.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Okobi OE. A systemic review on the association between infertility and sexual dysfunction among women utilizing female sexual function index as a measuring tool. Cureus. 2021;13(6):e16006.PubMedPubMedCentral Okobi OE. A systemic review on the association between infertility and sexual dysfunction among women utilizing female sexual function index as a measuring tool. Cureus. 2021;13(6):e16006.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference The American College of Obstetricians (ACOG) and gynecologists and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Pelvic organ prolapse. Interim update. Female Pelvic Med Reconstruct Surg. 2019;25(6):397–408. The American College of Obstetricians (ACOG) and gynecologists and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Pelvic organ prolapse. Interim update. Female Pelvic Med Reconstruct Surg. 2019;25(6):397–408.
6.
go back to reference The American College of Obstetricians (ACOG) and gynecologists and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Urinary incontinence in women. Practice bulletin number 155. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(5):e66–81. The American College of Obstetricians (ACOG) and gynecologists and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Urinary incontinence in women. Practice bulletin number 155. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(5):e66–81.
7.
go back to reference Silva AC, Maglinte DD. Pelvic floor disorders: what's the best test? Abdom Imaging. 2013;38(6):1391–408.CrossRef Silva AC, Maglinte DD. Pelvic floor disorders: what's the best test? Abdom Imaging. 2013;38(6):1391–408.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Swamy N, Bajaj G, Olliphant SS, Henry JA, Jambhekar K, Pandey T, Ram R. Pelvic floor imaging with MR defecography: correlation with gynecologic pelvic organ prolapse quantification. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46(4):1381–9.CrossRef Swamy N, Bajaj G, Olliphant SS, Henry JA, Jambhekar K, Pandey T, Ram R. Pelvic floor imaging with MR defecography: correlation with gynecologic pelvic organ prolapse quantification. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46(4):1381–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Quaghebeur J, Petros P, Wyndaele JJ, De Wachter S. Pelvic-floor function, dysfunction, and treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;26(5):143–9.CrossRef Quaghebeur J, Petros P, Wyndaele JJ, De Wachter S. Pelvic-floor function, dysfunction, and treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;26(5):143–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kieserman-Shmokler C, Swenson CW, Chen L, Desmond LM, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. From molecular to macro: the key role of the apical ligaments in uterovaginal support. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(5):427–36.CrossRef Kieserman-Shmokler C, Swenson CW, Chen L, Desmond LM, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. From molecular to macro: the key role of the apical ligaments in uterovaginal support. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(5):427–36.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Johnston SL. Pelvic floor dysfunction in midlife women. Review Climacteric. 2019;22(3):270–6.CrossRef Johnston SL. Pelvic floor dysfunction in midlife women. Review Climacteric. 2019;22(3):270–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lukacz ES, Santiago-Lastra Y, Albo ME, Brubaker L. Urinary incontinence in women: a review. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1592–604.CrossRef Lukacz ES, Santiago-Lastra Y, Albo ME, Brubaker L. Urinary incontinence in women: a review. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1592–604.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gong R, Xia Z. Collagen changes in pelvic support tissues in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;234:185–9.CrossRef Gong R, Xia Z. Collagen changes in pelvic support tissues in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;234:185–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cardenas-Trowers O, Meyer I, Markland AD, Richter HE, Addis I. A review of phytoestrogens and their association with pelvic floor conditions. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018;24(3):193–202.CrossRef Cardenas-Trowers O, Meyer I, Markland AD, Richter HE, Addis I. A review of phytoestrogens and their association with pelvic floor conditions. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018;24(3):193–202.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Easley DC, Abramowitch SD, Moalli PA. Female pelvic floor biomechanics: bridging the gap. Curr Opin Urol. 2017;27(3):262–7.CrossRef Easley DC, Abramowitch SD, Moalli PA. Female pelvic floor biomechanics: bridging the gap. Curr Opin Urol. 2017;27(3):262–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Siddiqui NY, Gregory WT, Handa VL, et al. American Urogynecologic Society prolapse consensus conference summary report. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018;24(4):260–3.CrossRef Siddiqui NY, Gregory WT, Handa VL, et al. American Urogynecologic Society prolapse consensus conference summary report. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018;24(4):260–3.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lucente V, van Raalte H, Murphy M, Egorov V. Biomechanical paradigm and interpretation of female pelvic floor conditions before a treatment. Int J Women's Health. 2017;9:521–50.CrossRef Lucente V, van Raalte H, Murphy M, Egorov V. Biomechanical paradigm and interpretation of female pelvic floor conditions before a treatment. Int J Women's Health. 2017;9:521–50.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hoyte L, Damaser MS. What the future holds, in: biomechanics of the female pelvic floor. Elsevier. 2016:435–6. Hoyte L, Damaser MS. What the future holds, in: biomechanics of the female pelvic floor. Elsevier. 2016:435–6.
20.
go back to reference Ahmad AN, Hainsworth A, Williams AB, Schizas AM. A review of functional pelvic floor imaging modalities and their effectiveness. Clin Imaging. 2015;39(4):559–65.CrossRef Ahmad AN, Hainsworth A, Williams AB, Schizas AM. A review of functional pelvic floor imaging modalities and their effectiveness. Clin Imaging. 2015;39(4):559–65.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Egorov V, van Raalte H, Lucente V, Sarvazyan A. Biomechanical characterization of the pelvic floor using tactile imaging. In: Biomechanics of the Female Pelvic Floor, Eds. Hoyte L, Damaser MS, Elsevier. 2016: 317–48. Egorov V, van Raalte H, Lucente V, Sarvazyan A. Biomechanical characterization of the pelvic floor using tactile imaging. In: Biomechanics of the Female Pelvic Floor, Eds. Hoyte L, Damaser MS, Elsevier. 2016: 317–48.
22.
go back to reference Egorov V, Shobeiri AS, Takacs P, Hoyte L, Lucente V, van Raalte H. Biomechanical mapping of the female pelvic floor: prolapse versus normal conditions. Open J Obstetrics and Gynecol. 2018;8:900–25.CrossRef Egorov V, Shobeiri AS, Takacs P, Hoyte L, Lucente V, van Raalte H. Biomechanical mapping of the female pelvic floor: prolapse versus normal conditions. Open J Obstetrics and Gynecol. 2018;8:900–25.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Egorov V, Ayrapetyan S, Sarvazyan AP. Prostate mechanical imaging: 3-D image composition and feature calculations. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006;25(10):1329–40.CrossRef Egorov V, Ayrapetyan S, Sarvazyan AP. Prostate mechanical imaging: 3-D image composition and feature calculations. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006;25(10):1329–40.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Egorov V, Sarvazyan AP. Mechanical imaging of the breast. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008;27(9):1275–87.CrossRef Egorov V, Sarvazyan AP. Mechanical imaging of the breast. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008;27(9):1275–87.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference van Raalte H, Lucente V, Ephrain S, Murphy M, Bhatia N, Sarvazyan N, Egorov V. (2016) intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of vaginal tactile imaging. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22:S130–1. van Raalte H, Lucente V, Ephrain S, Murphy M, Bhatia N, Sarvazyan N, Egorov V. (2016) intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of vaginal tactile imaging. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22:S130–1.
26.
go back to reference McGill R, Tukey JW, Larsen WA. Variations of box plots. Am Statistician. 1978;32:12–6. McGill R, Tukey JW, Larsen WA. Variations of box plots. Am Statistician. 1978;32:12–6.
27.
go back to reference Faulkner KG. The tale of the T-score: review and perspective. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(4):347–52.CrossRef Faulkner KG. The tale of the T-score: review and perspective. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(4):347–52.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kanis JA. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 1994;4(6):368–81.CrossRef Kanis JA. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 1994;4(6):368–81.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Patterson D, Handa VL. Pathophysiology of pelvic floor disorders. In: Urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2022. p. 70–81. Patterson D, Handa VL. Pathophysiology of pelvic floor disorders. In: Urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2022. p. 70–81.
30.
go back to reference Hajian-Tilaki K. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for medical diagnostic test evaluation. Caspian J Intern Med. 2013;4(2):627–35.PubMedPubMedCentral Hajian-Tilaki K. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for medical diagnostic test evaluation. Caspian J Intern Med. 2013;4(2):627–35.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Biomechanical integrity score of the female pelvic floor
Authors
Vladimir Egorov
Heather van Raalte
Peter Takacs
S. Abbas Shobeiri
Vincent Lucente
Lennox Hoyte
Publication date
01-03-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05120-w

Other articles of this Issue 6/2022

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2022 Go to the issue