Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 4/2020

Open Access 01-04-2020 | Stress Incontinence | Original Article

Long-term re-procedure rate after mid-urethral slings for stress urinary incontinence

Authors: Sari Tulokas, Päivi Rahkola-Soisalo, Mika Gissler, Tomi S. Mikkola, Maarit J. Mentula

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Long-term safety concerns have risen over the mid-urethral sling operation (MUS) for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), which in some countries has led to litigations and even suspending MUS insertions. We examined the long-term re-procedure rate after MUS operations. The main outcome was re-procedures for SUI. The secondary outcome was surgical interventions due to complications.

Methods

We analysed a retrospective population cohort of 3531 women with MUS operations in 2000–2006 and followed them up until 31 December 2016. Data were collected from a national hospital register and from hospital patient records.

Results

The median follow-up time was 13 years (IQR 11.6–14.8) for the 3280 women with a retropubic MUS (RP-MUS) and 11 years (IQR 10.3–11.9) for the 245 women with a transobturator MUS (TO-MUS). The cumulative number of re-procedures for SUI was 16 (0.5%) at 1 year, 66 (1.9%) at 5 years, 97 (2.8%) at 10 years and 112 (3.2%) at 17 years. This risk was higher after TO-MUS than after RP-MUS operations (OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.5–5.2, p < 0.001). The cumulative number of any long-term re-procedure was 43 (1.2%) at year 1, 105 (3.0%) at year 5, 144 (4.1%) at year 10 and 163 (4.6%) at year 17.

Conclusions

Re-procedures occur up to 17 years after primary MUS insertion, but their incidence is low after the first few postoperative years. Re-procedures for recurrent SUI are more common after TO-MUS than RP-MUS.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
5.
go back to reference England N (2017) Mesh oversight group report. England N (2017) Mesh oversight group report.
6.
go back to reference Government S (2017) Scottish independent review of the use, safety and efficacy of transvaginal mesh implants in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women. Government S (2017) Scottish independent review of the use, safety and efficacy of transvaginal mesh implants in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women.
7.
go back to reference Administration USFaD (2019) Considerations about Surgical Mesh for SUI. Administration USFaD (2019) Considerations about Surgical Mesh for SUI.
9.
go back to reference Morling JR, McAllister DA, Agur W, Fischbacher CM, Glazener CM, Guerrero K, et al. Adverse events after first, single, mesh and non-mesh surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in Scotland, 1997-2016: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2017;389(10069):629–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32572-7.CrossRef Morling JR, McAllister DA, Agur W, Fischbacher CM, Glazener CM, Guerrero K, et al. Adverse events after first, single, mesh and non-mesh surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in Scotland, 1997-2016: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2017;389(10069):629–40. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(16)32572-7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Cosson M, Davila GW, Deprest J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(1):3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1324-9.CrossRef Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Cosson M, Davila GW, Deprest J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(1):3–15. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00192-010-1324-9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Long-term re-procedure rate after mid-urethral slings for stress urinary incontinence
Authors
Sari Tulokas
Päivi Rahkola-Soisalo
Mika Gissler
Tomi S. Mikkola
Maarit J. Mentula
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04223-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

International Urogynecology Journal 4/2020 Go to the issue