Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2020

Open Access 01-06-2020 | Ultrasound | Original Article

Ultrasound imaging of the perineal body: a useful clinical tool

Authors: Victoria Asfour, Giuseppe Alessandro Digesu, Ruwan Fernando, Vik Khullar

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The perineal body is a fibromuscular pyramidal structure located between the vagina and the anus. It has been difficult to image because of its small size and anatomical location. This study used 2D transperineal ultrasound to measure the perineal body and assess whether there is an association with prolapse.

Methods

An observational, cross-sectional study was carried out in a tertiary level Urogynaecology department and included prolapse patients and healthy nulliparous volunteers (control group). This was a clinical assessment, including POP-Q and trans-perineal 2D ultrasound measurement of the perineal body height, length, perimeter, and area. Parametric tests were used, as the data were normally distributed. Results are reported as mean and 95% confidence interval (±95% CI).

Results

A total of 101 participants were recruited of which 22 were nulliparous healthy volunteers. Mean perineal body measurements in controls were height 22.5 ± 3.3 mm, length 17.4 ± 2.7 mm, perimeter 7.5 ± 0.9 mm, and area 2.8 ± 0.38 cm2. Perineal body measurements in 79 prolapse patients: height 16.9 ± 1.7 mm, length 16.0 ± 1.4 mm, perimeter 6.5 ± 0.5 mm and area 2.1 ± 0.5 cm2. A small perineal body was strongly associated with posterior compartment prolapse (paired t test, p < 0.0001) and wider POP-Q GH (paired t test, p = 0.0003). Surprisingly, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Perineal Body (POP-Q PB) of the two groups was not significantly different. A perineal body mid-sagittal area of less than 2.4 cm2 has been shown to be associated strongly with posterior compartment prolapse.

Conclusions

It is possible to measure the perineal body on 2D ultrasound. This technique facilitates the objective diagnosis of perineal deficiency. POP-Q PB does not predict the length or area of the perineal body.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kelly HA. Operative gynaecology. New York: Appleton; 1898. Kelly HA. Operative gynaecology. New York: Appleton; 1898.
2.
go back to reference Emmet TA. A study of the etiology of perineal laceration, with a new method for its proper repair. Gynecological Transactions, 1883. Emmet TA. A study of the etiology of perineal laceration, with a new method for its proper repair. Gynecological Transactions, 1883.
3.
go back to reference Lamblin G, Delorme E, Cosson M, Rubod C. Cystocele and functional anatomy of the pelvic floor: review and update of the various theories. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(9):1297–305.CrossRef Lamblin G, Delorme E, Cosson M, Rubod C. Cystocele and functional anatomy of the pelvic floor: review and update of the various theories. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(9):1297–305.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference DeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(6):1713–20 discussion 1720–3.CrossRef DeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(6):1713–20 discussion 1720–3.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Arenholt LTS, Pedersen BG, Glavind K, Glavind-Kristensen M, DeLancey JOL. Paravaginal defect: anatomy, clinical findings, and imaging. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(5):661–73.CrossRef Arenholt LTS, Pedersen BG, Glavind K, Glavind-Kristensen M, DeLancey JOL. Paravaginal defect: anatomy, clinical findings, and imaging. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(5):661–73.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Petros PEP, Woodman PJ. The integral theory of continence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(1):35–40.CrossRef Petros PEP, Woodman PJ. The integral theory of continence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(1):35–40.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tansatit T, Apinuntrum P, Phetudom T, Phanchart P. New insights into the pelvic organ support framework. Eur J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;166(2):221–5.CrossRef Tansatit T, Apinuntrum P, Phetudom T, Phanchart P. New insights into the pelvic organ support framework. Eur J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;166(2):221–5.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Atan IK, Lin S, Dietz HP, Herbison P, Wilson PD. Levator avulsion is associated with pelvic organ prolapse 23 years after the first childbirth. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37:2829–39.CrossRef Atan IK, Lin S, Dietz HP, Herbison P, Wilson PD. Levator avulsion is associated with pelvic organ prolapse 23 years after the first childbirth. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37:2829–39.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Van Delft KWM, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Inthout J, Kluivers KB. The natural history of levator avulsion one year following childbirth: a prospective study. BJOG. 2015;122(9):1266–73.CrossRef Van Delft KWM, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Inthout J, Kluivers KB. The natural history of levator avulsion one year following childbirth: a prospective study. BJOG. 2015;122(9):1266–73.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chantarasorn V, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Mobility of the perineal body and anorectal junction before and after childbirth. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(6):729–33.CrossRef Chantarasorn V, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Mobility of the perineal body and anorectal junction before and after childbirth. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(6):729–33.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Santoro GA, Shobeiri SA, Petros PP, Zapater P, Wieczorek AP. Perineal body anatomy seen by three-dimensional endovaginal ultrasound of asymptomatic nulliparae. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18(4):400–9.CrossRef Santoro GA, Shobeiri SA, Petros PP, Zapater P, Wieczorek AP. Perineal body anatomy seen by three-dimensional endovaginal ultrasound of asymptomatic nulliparae. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18(4):400–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Xie B, Chen L, Xue Z, English EM, Fenner DE, Gaetke-Udager K, et al. Comparison of measurement systems for posterior vaginal wall prolapse on magnetic resonance imaging. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(8):1269-1277.CrossRef Xie B, Chen L, Xue Z, English EM, Fenner DE, Gaetke-Udager K, et al. Comparison of measurement systems for posterior vaginal wall prolapse on magnetic resonance imaging. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(8):1269-1277.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Larson KA, Hsu Y, Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JOL. Magnetic resonance imaging-based three-dimensional model of anterior vaginal wall position at rest and maximal strain in women with and without prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(9):1103–9.CrossRef Larson KA, Hsu Y, Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JOL. Magnetic resonance imaging-based three-dimensional model of anterior vaginal wall position at rest and maximal strain in women with and without prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(9):1103–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shafik A, Sibai OE, Shafik AA, Shafik IA. A novel concept for the surgical anatomy of the perineal body. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(12):2120–5.CrossRef Shafik A, Sibai OE, Shafik AA, Shafik IA. A novel concept for the surgical anatomy of the perineal body. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(12):2120–5.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Digesu GA, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, Hutchings A, Khullar V. The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG. 2005;112(7):971–6.CrossRef Digesu GA, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, Hutchings A, Khullar V. The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG. 2005;112(7):971–6.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dunivan GC, Lyons KE, Jeppson PC, Ninivaggio CS, Komesu YM, Alba FM, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse stage and the relationship to genital hiatus and perineal body measurements. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(6):497–500.CrossRef Dunivan GC, Lyons KE, Jeppson PC, Ninivaggio CS, Komesu YM, Alba FM, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse stage and the relationship to genital hiatus and perineal body measurements. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(6):497–500.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Volloyhaug I, Wong V, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Does levator avulsion cause distension of the genital hiatus and perineal body? Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(7):1161–5.CrossRef Volloyhaug I, Wong V, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Does levator avulsion cause distension of the genital hiatus and perineal body? Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(7):1161–5.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Shafik A, Ahmed I, Shafik AA, El-Ghamrawy TA, El-Sibai O. Surgical anatomy of the perineal muscles and their role in perineal disorders. Anat Sci Int. 2005;80(3):167–71.CrossRef Shafik A, Ahmed I, Shafik AA, El-Ghamrawy TA, El-Sibai O. Surgical anatomy of the perineal muscles and their role in perineal disorders. Anat Sci Int. 2005;80(3):167–71.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kamisan Atan I, Shek KL, Furtado GI, Caudwell-Hall J, Dietz HP. The association between levator-urethra gap measurements and symptoms and signs of female pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(6):442–6.CrossRef Kamisan Atan I, Shek KL, Furtado GI, Caudwell-Hall J, Dietz HP. The association between levator-urethra gap measurements and symptoms and signs of female pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(6):442–6.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Strohbehn K, Jakary JA, DeLancey JO. Pelvic organ prolapse in young women. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(1):33–6.CrossRef Strohbehn K, Jakary JA, DeLancey JO. Pelvic organ prolapse in young women. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(1):33–6.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rahn DD, Ruff MD, Brown SA, Tibbals HF, Word RA. Biomechanical properties of the vaginal wall: effect of pregnancy, elastic fiber deficiency, and pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(5):590.e1–6.CrossRef Rahn DD, Ruff MD, Brown SA, Tibbals HF, Word RA. Biomechanical properties of the vaginal wall: effect of pregnancy, elastic fiber deficiency, and pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(5):590.e1–6.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Snooks SJ, Swash M, Mathers SE, Henry MM. Effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor: a 5-year follow-up. Br J Surg. 1990;77(12):1358–60.CrossRef Snooks SJ, Swash M, Mathers SE, Henry MM. Effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor: a 5-year follow-up. Br J Surg. 1990;77(12):1358–60.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Kimberger O, Halpern K, Schneidinger C, Haslinger P, et al. The role of tenascin-X in the uterosacral ligaments of postmenopausal women with pelvic organ prolapse: an immunohistochemical study. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3820-2. Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Kimberger O, Halpern K, Schneidinger C, Haslinger P, et al. The role of tenascin-X in the uterosacral ligaments of postmenopausal women with pelvic organ prolapse: an immunohistochemical study. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00192-018-3820-2.
24.
go back to reference Doumouchtsis SK, Chrysanthopoulou EL. Urogenital consequences in ageing women. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(5):699–714.CrossRef Doumouchtsis SK, Chrysanthopoulou EL. Urogenital consequences in ageing women. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(5):699–714.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501–6.CrossRef Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501–6.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(2):372–7; discussion 377–9.CrossRef Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(2):372–7; discussion 377–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Spence-Jones C, Kamm MA, Henry MM, Hudson CN. Bowel dysfunction: a pathogenic factor in uterovaginal prolapse and urinary stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101(2):147–52.CrossRef Spence-Jones C, Kamm MA, Henry MM, Hudson CN. Bowel dysfunction: a pathogenic factor in uterovaginal prolapse and urinary stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101(2):147–52.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Woodman PJ, Swift SE, O'Boyle AL, Valley MT, Bland DR, Kahn MA, et al. Prevalence of severe pelvic organ prolapse in relation to job description and socioeconomic status: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(4):340–5.CrossRef Woodman PJ, Swift SE, O'Boyle AL, Valley MT, Bland DR, Kahn MA, et al. Prevalence of severe pelvic organ prolapse in relation to job description and socioeconomic status: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(4):340–5.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1160–6.CrossRef Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1160–6.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Handa VL, Pannu HK, Siddique S, Gutman R, VanRooyen J, Cundiff G. Architectural differences in the bony pelvis of women with and without pelvic floor disorders. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(6):1283–90.PubMed Handa VL, Pannu HK, Siddique S, Gutman R, VanRooyen J, Cundiff G. Architectural differences in the bony pelvis of women with and without pelvic floor disorders. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(6):1283–90.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Ultrasound imaging of the perineal body: a useful clinical tool
Authors
Victoria Asfour
Giuseppe Alessandro Digesu
Ruwan Fernando
Vik Khullar
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04166-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2020 Go to the issue