Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Urogynecology Journal
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 7/2020

01-07-2020 | Cystocele | Original Article

Preoperative predictors and a prediction score for perception of improvement after mesh prolapse surgery

Authors: Chloé Chattot, Xavier Deffieux, Jean-Philippe Lucot, Xavier Fritel, Arnaud Fauconnier

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 7/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery using a mesh has a complication rate of 26%, and an estimated 10% of those operated on do not consider it brings improvement. The objective of this study was to identify preoperative predictors of improvement after POP repair with mesh to develop a predictive score.

Methods

This is a secondary analysis of the randomized multicenter trial PROSPERE, which compared morbidity after prolapse repair with mesh according to the vaginal or laparoscopic approach. Improved women [PGI-I score at 1-year follow-up = 1 (much better) or 2 (better)] were compared with unimproved women. Two hundred fifty-five women were included to derive the prediction score based on multiple logistic regression. An internal validation by bootstrapping estimated the unbiased performance of the model.

Results

Criteria independently related to improvement were: (1) cystocele stage > II [OR: 2.93 95% CI (1.22–7.04), p = 0.015]; (2) preoperative expectation related to bulge symptom improvement [OR: 2.57 95% CI (1.07–6.04), p = 0.031] and (3) absence of chronic pelvic pain [OR: 4.55 95% CI (1.77–11.46), p = 0.001]. A score (scored from 0 to 11) was constructed from the aOR of the predictive model: the ROC-AUC of the score was 0.75, and a score ≥ 9 predicted a 97% chance of improvement (95% CI 92–99), with a specificity of 85% (95% CI 68–94). The ROC-AUC corrected for optimism by the bootstrap procedure was 0.70.

Conclusions

This score could be used by surgeons in preoperative counseling of women.
Literature
1.
Bump RC, Norton PA. Epidemiology and natural history of pelvic floor dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 1998;25(4):723–46.CrossRef
2.
Smith FJ, Holman CDJ, Moorin RE, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1096–100.CrossRef
3.
Maher CF, Baessler KK, Barber MD, Cheon C, Consten ECJ, Cooper KG, et al. Summary: 2017 international consultation on incontinence evidence-based surgical pathway for pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SPV.​0000000000000591​. Volume Publish Ahead of Print-Issue-p.
4.
Lucot J-P, Cosson M, Bader G, Debodinance P, Akladios C, Salet-Lizée D, et al. Safety of vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic mesh Sacropexy for cystocele repair: results of the prosthetic pelvic floor repair randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2018;74(2):167–76.CrossRef
5.
de Landsheere L, Ismail S, Lucot J-P, Deken V, Foidart J-M, Cosson M. Surgical intervention after transvaginal Prolift mesh repair: retrospective single-center study including 524 patients with 3 years’ median follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(1):83.e1–7.CrossRef
6.
Pécheux O, Giraudet G, Drumez E, Di Serio M, Estelle J-D-G, De Landsheere L, et al. Long-term (8.5 years) analysis of the type and rate of reoperation after transvaginal mesh repair (Prolift®) in 349 patients. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;232:33–9.CrossRef
7.
8.
Le Normand L, Cosson M, Cour F, Deffieux X, Donon L, Ferry P, et al. Clinical practice guidelines: synthesis of the guidelines for the surgical treatment of primary pelvic organ prolapse in women by the AFU, CNGOF, SIFUD-PP, SNFCP, and SCGP. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;46(5):387–91.CrossRef
9.
Duraes M, Panel L, Cornille A, Courtieu C. Long-term follow-up of patients treated by transvaginal mesh repair for anterior prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;230:124–9.CrossRef
10.
Bui C, Ballester M, Chéreau E, Guillo E, Daraï E. Functional results and quality of life of laparoscopic promontofixation in the cure of genital prolapse. Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertil. 2010;38(10):563–8.CrossRef
11.
Bacle J, Papatsoris AG, Bigot P, Azzouzi A-R, Brychaet P-E, Piussan J, et al. Laparoscopic promontofixation for pelvic organ prolapse: a 10-year single center experience in a series of 501 patients. Int J Urol. 2011;18(12):821–6.CrossRef
12.
Milani AL, Damoiseaux A, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, Withagen MIJ. Long-term outcome of vaginal mesh or native tissue in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(6):847–58.CrossRef
13.
Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. A longitudinal study of patient and surgeon goal achievement 2 years after surgery following pelvic floor dysfunction surgery. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117(12):1504–11.CrossRef
14.
Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10–7.CrossRef
15.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRef
16.
de Tayrac R, Deval B, Fernandez H, Marès P. Mapi research institute. [development of a linguistically validated French version of two short-form, condition-specific quality of life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7)]. J Gynécologie Obstétrique. Biol Reprod. 2007;36(8):738–48.
17.
Wein AJ. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2005;173(3):908–9.PubMed
18.
Altomare DF, Spazzafumo L, Rinaldi M, Dodi G, Ghiselli R, Piloni V. Set-up and statistical validation of a new scoring system for obstructed defaecation syndrome. Color Dis. 2008;10(1):84–8.
19.
Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care. 2005;43(3):203–20.CrossRef
20.
Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26(2):191–208.CrossRef
21.
Rockwood TH, Constantine ML, Adegoke O, Rogers RG, McDermott E, Davila GW, et al. The PISQ-IR: considerations in scale scoring and development. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(7):1105–22.CrossRef
22.
Chapron C, Barakat H, Fritel X, Dubuisson J-B, Bréart G, Fauconnier A. Presurgical diagnosis of posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis based on a standardized questionnaire. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(2):507–13.CrossRef
23.
Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Vieira M, Barakat H, Dousset B, Pansini V, et al. Anatomical distribution of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: surgical implications and proposition for a classification. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2003;18(1):157–61.CrossRef
24.
Fauconnier A, Dubuisson J-B, Foulot H, Deyrolles C, Sarrot F, Laveyssière M-N, et al. Mobile uterine retroversion is associated with dyspareunia and dysmenorrhea in an unselected population of women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;127(2):252–6.CrossRef
25.
Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Validation of the patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(5):523–8.CrossRef
26.
Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(1):98–101.CrossRef
27.
Moons KGM, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, Collins GS. Transparent reporting of a multivariate prediction model for individual prognosis or development initiative. New guideline for the reporting of studies developing, validating, or updating a multivariable clinical prediction model: the TRIPOD statement. Adv Anat Pathol. 2015;22(5):303–5.CrossRef
28.
29.
Demler OV, Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB. Misuse of DeLong test to compare AUCs for nested models. Stat Med. 2012;31(23):2577–87.CrossRef
30.
Buckley RG, King KJ, Disney JD, Ambroz PK, Gorman JD, Klausen JH. Derivation of a clinical prediction model for the emergency department diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5(10):951–60.CrossRef
31.
Miller TD, Hodge DO, Christian TF, Milavetz JJ, Bailey KR, Gibbons RJ. Effects of adjustment for referral bias on the sensitivity and specificity of single photon emission computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Am J Med. 2002;112(4):290–7.CrossRef
32.
Sabbagh R, Mandron E, Piussan J, Brychaert PE, Tu LM. Long-term anatomical and functional results of laparoscopic promontofixation for pelvic organ prolapse. BJU Int. 2010;106(6):861–6.CrossRef
33.
Mourik SL, Martens JE, Aktas M. Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse using robot assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy: quality of life and technique. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;165(1):122–7.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Preoperative predictors and a prediction score for perception of improvement after mesh prolapse surgery
Authors
Chloé Chattot
Xavier Deffieux
Jean-Philippe Lucot
Xavier Fritel
Arnaud Fauconnier
Publication date
01-07-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03953-6

Other articles of this Issue 7/2020

International Urogynecology Journal 7/2020 Go to the issue

IUJ Video

How we perform a posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation by the vaginal route

Original Article

Cost-effectiveness of a preoperative pelvic MRI in pelvic organ prolapse surgery

Original Article

Addressing apical support during hysterectomy for prolapse: a NSQIP review

IUJ Video

Management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after sacrocolpopexy. A video case series

Original Article

Post-hospital syndrome predicts poor postoperative outcomes and increased cost following transvaginal midurethral sling placement

Original Article

Persistent occiput posterior position and stress distribution in levator ani muscle during vaginal delivery computed by a finite element model