Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 12/2019

01-12-2019 | Sacrocolpopexy | Original Article

Flow disruptions in robotic-assisted abdominal sacrocolpopexy: does robotic surgery introduce unforeseen challenges for gynecologic surgeons?

Authors: Colby P. Souders, Ken Catchpole, Alex Hannemann, Ronit Lyon, Karyn S. Eilber, Catherine Bresee, Tara Cohen, Matthias Weigl, Jennifer T. Anger

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 12/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to apply a human factors research approach to identify flow disruptions, deviations in the optimal course of care, in robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy procedures with the ultimate goal of developing system interventions to improve the safety and efficiency of robotic surgery.

Methods

Twenty-four robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy procedures were observed for flow disruptions. Surgeries were divided into four phases: (1) patient arrival and induction of anesthesia; (2) port placement and robot docking; (3) console time; (4) undocking of robot, incision closure, and patient exiting the OR.

Results

Flow disruptions were observed at a rate of 10.9 ± 5.1 per hour. The most frequently observed flow disruptions involved training issues (2.8 ± 2.4 flow disruptions per hour), equipment (2.2 ± 1.6 flow disruptions per hour), and poor coordination (2.0 ± 1.3 flow disruptions per hour). The rate of flow disruptions was highest in phase 2 (19.2 ± 14.4 flow disruptions per hour). Cases with more experienced surgeons involved shorter console times by 1.5 h (95% CI: 0.1, 3.0, p = 0.033) and 1.8 fewer (95% CI: 1.2, 2.6, p = 0.001) flow disruptions per hour. Surgeries were 1 h shorter on average (95% CI: 0.1, 1.9, p = 0.034) in cases in which the patient was > 65 years old. Da Vinci S console times were 0.8 h longer (95% CI: 0.01, 1.5, p = 0.047) than Si.

Conclusions

Flow disruptions in robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy surgery occur about every 6 min. Flow disruption rates are highest during the most complex portions of the surgery. More experienced surgeons have lower flow disruption rates and operate more quickly.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, et al. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA. 2013;309:689.CrossRef Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, et al. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA. 2013;309:689.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Catchpole K, Perkins C, Bresee C, et al. Safety, efficiency and learning curves in robotic surgery: a human factors analysis. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:3749.CrossRef Catchpole K, Perkins C, Bresee C, et al. Safety, efficiency and learning curves in robotic surgery: a human factors analysis. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:3749.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Catchpole K, Mishra A, Handa A, et al. Teamwork and error in the operating room: analysis of skills and roles. Ann Surg. 2008;247:699.CrossRef Catchpole K, Mishra A, Handa A, et al. Teamwork and error in the operating room: analysis of skills and roles. Ann Surg. 2008;247:699.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nayyar R, Gupta NP. Critical appraisal of technical problems with robotic urological surgery. BJU Int. 2010;105:1710.CrossRef Nayyar R, Gupta NP. Critical appraisal of technical problems with robotic urological surgery. BJU Int. 2010;105:1710.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wiegmann DA, Eggman AA, Elbardissi AW, et al. Improving cardiac surgical care: a work systems approach. Appl Ergon. 2010;41:701.CrossRef Wiegmann DA, Eggman AA, Elbardissi AW, et al. Improving cardiac surgical care: a work systems approach. Appl Ergon. 2010;41:701.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Catchpole K, Wiegmann D. Understanding safety and performance in the cardiac operating room: from ‘sharp end’ to ‘blunt end’. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:807.CrossRef Catchpole K, Wiegmann D. Understanding safety and performance in the cardiac operating room: from ‘sharp end’ to ‘blunt end’. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:807.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Carayon P, Schoofs Hundt A, Karsh BT, et al. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(Suppl 1):i50.CrossRef Carayon P, Schoofs Hundt A, Karsh BT, et al. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(Suppl 1):i50.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dru CJ, Anger JT, Souders CP, et al. Surgical flow disruptions during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Can J Urol. 2017;24:8814.PubMed Dru CJ, Anger JT, Souders CP, et al. Surgical flow disruptions during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Can J Urol. 2017;24:8814.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Parker SEH, Laviana AA, Wadhera RK, et al. Development and evaluation of an observational tool for assessing surgical flow disruptions and their impact on surgical performance. World J Surg. 2010;34:353.CrossRef Parker SEH, Laviana AA, Wadhera RK, et al. Development and evaluation of an observational tool for assessing surgical flow disruptions and their impact on surgical performance. World J Surg. 2010;34:353.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Catchpole KR, Giddings AE, de Leval MR, et al. Identification of systems failures in successful paediatric cardiac surgery. Ergonomics. 2006;49:567.CrossRef Catchpole KR, Giddings AE, de Leval MR, et al. Identification of systems failures in successful paediatric cardiac surgery. Ergonomics. 2006;49:567.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Catchpole KR, Giddings AE, Wilkinson M, et al. Improving patient safety by identifying latent failures in successful operations. Surgery. 2007;142:102.CrossRef Catchpole KR, Giddings AE, Wilkinson M, et al. Improving patient safety by identifying latent failures in successful operations. Surgery. 2007;142:102.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference McCulloch P, Mishra A, Handa A, et al. The effects of aviation-style non-technical skills training on technical performance and outcome in the operating theatre. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:109.CrossRef McCulloch P, Mishra A, Handa A, et al. The effects of aviation-style non-technical skills training on technical performance and outcome in the operating theatre. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:109.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mishra A, Catchpole K, Dale T, et al. The influence of non-technical performance on technical outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:68.CrossRef Mishra A, Catchpole K, Dale T, et al. The influence of non-technical performance on technical outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:68.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Catchpole K, Ley E, Wiegmann D, et al. A human factors subsystems approach to trauma care. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:962.CrossRef Catchpole K, Ley E, Wiegmann D, et al. A human factors subsystems approach to trauma care. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:962.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Flow disruptions in robotic-assisted abdominal sacrocolpopexy: does robotic surgery introduce unforeseen challenges for gynecologic surgeons?
Authors
Colby P. Souders
Ken Catchpole
Alex Hannemann
Ronit Lyon
Karyn S. Eilber
Catherine Bresee
Tara Cohen
Matthias Weigl
Jennifer T. Anger
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Sacrocolpopexy
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 12/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03929-6

Other articles of this Issue 12/2019

International Urogynecology Journal 12/2019 Go to the issue