Top

International Urogynecology Journal

Published in:

01-09-2019 | Original Article

Urinary incontinence among women—which personal and professional relations are involved? A population-based study

Authors: Isabella Raasthøj, Sandra Elnegaard, Marianne Rosendal, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 9/2019

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Urinary incontinence (UI) is frequent among women worldwide, but embarrassment and shame can prevent them from discussing symptoms with others. This study aimed to identify personal and professional relations involved by Danish women with UI. It further aimed to investigate whether age, persistence of symptoms, number of symptoms, influence on daily activities and concern about the symptoms are associated with involving personal and professional relations.

Methods

A sample of 51,090 Danish women, aged ≥ 20 years, were invited to participate in a web-based cross-sectional survey in 2012. We identified individuals with self-reported symptoms of stress incontinence, urge incontinence and UI without stress/urge and explored the involvement of personal and professional relations. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression were used for analyses.

Results

In total, 26,466 women completed the questionnaire. Of the 5861 (22.1%) women who had experienced a minimum of one UI symptom within the preceding 4 weeks, 71.4% did not involve any professional relations and 45.0% did not involve any personal relations. Further, 38.8% involved neither personal nor professional relations. Personal relations were most often involved, mainly those with the spouse/partner, friends and children. Involving a personal relation was associated with three to five times increased odds of involving health care professionals for all UI types.

Conclusions

UI is highly prevalent, but the condition is infrequently discussed in personal and professional relations. Future research should address the quality of the contacts made and barriers to involving other people.

Minassian VA, Drutz HP, Al-Badr A. Urinary incontinence as a worldwide problem. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;82(3):327–38.CrossRefPubMed

Bartoli S, Aguzzi G, Tarricone R. Impact on quality of life of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder: a systematic literature review. Urology. 2010;75(3):491–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.07.1325.CrossRefPubMed

Wood LN, Anger JT. Urinary incontinence in women. BMJ. 2014;349:g4531. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4531.CrossRefPubMed

Seim A, Sivertsen B, Eriksen BC, Hunskaar S. Treatment of urinary incontinence in women in general practice: observational study. BMJ. 1996;312(7044):1459–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

The Danish College of General Practitioners (DSAM). Klinisk vejledning for almen praksis: Udredning og behandling af nedre urinvejssymptomer hos mænd og kvinder [Clinical guideline: Investigation and Treatment of Lower Urinary symptoms among Men and Women]. 2009.

Elnegaard S, Andersen RS, Pedersen AF, Larsen PV, Sondergaard J, Rasmussen S, et al. Self-reported symptoms and healthcare seeking in the general population—exploring “the symptom iceberg”. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:685. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2034-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kinchen KS, Burgio K, Diokno AC, Fultz NH, Bump R, Obenchain R. Factors associated with women's decisions to seek treatment for urinary incontinence. J Women’s Health. 2003;12(7):687–98. https://doi.org/10.1089/154099903322404339.CrossRef

Elnegaard S, Pedersen AF, Sand Andersen R, Christensen Rd-P, Jarbøl DE. What triggers healthcare-seeking behaviour when experiencing a symptom? Results from a population-based survey. BJGP Open. 2017;1(2). https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen17X100761.

Burgio KL, Ives DG, Locher JL, Arena VC, Kuller LH. Treatment seeking for urinary incontinence in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42(2):208–12.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Roe B, Doll H, Wilson K. Help seeking behaviour and health and social services utilisation by people suffering from urinary incontinence. Int J Nurs Stud. 1999;36(3):245–53.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Shaw C, Das Gupta R, Williams KS, Assassa RP, McGrother C. A survey of help-seeking and treatment provision in women with stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2006;97(4):752–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06071.x.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Holst K, Wilson PD. The prevalence of female urinary incontinence and reasons for not seeking treatment. N Z Med J. 1988;101(857):756–8.PubMed

13.

Hagglund D, Walker-Engstrom ML, Larsson G, Leppert J. Quality of life and seeking help in women with urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(11):1051–5.PubMed

14.

Seim A, Sandvik H, Hermstad R, Hunskaar S. Female urinary incontinence—consultation behaviour and patient experiences: an epidemiological survey in a Norwegian community. Fam Pract. 1995;12(1):18–21.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Rekers H, Drogendijk AC, Valkenburg H, Riphagen F. Urinary incontinence in women from 35 to 79 years of age: prevalence and consequences. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1992;43(3):229–34.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Pescosolido BA. Beyond rational choice: the social dynamics of how people seek help. Am J Sociol. 1992;97(4):1096–138.CrossRef

17.

Rasmussen S, Sondergaard J, Larsen PV, Balasubramaniam K, Elnegaard S, Svendsen RP, et al. The Danish symptom cohort: questionnaire and feasibility in the Nationwide study on symptom experience and healthcare-seeking among 100 000 individuals. Int J Family Med. 2014;2014:187280. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/187280.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Pedersen CB, Gotzsche H, Moller JO, Mortensen PB. The Danish civil registration system. A cohort of eight million persons. Dan Med Bull. 2006;53(4):441–9.PubMed

19.

Elnegaard S, Andersen RS, Pedersen AF, Jarbol DE. Activation of professional and personal network relations when experiencing a symptom: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(10):e017620. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017620.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Due P, Holstein B, Lund R, Modvig J, Avlund K. Social relations: network, support and relational strain. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(5):661–73.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Rohr G, Stovring H, Christensen K, Gaist D, Nybo H, Kragstrup J. Characteristics of middle-aged and elderly women with urinary incontinence. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2005;23(4):203–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430500362803.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Schreiber Pedersen L, Lose G, Hoybye MT, Elsner S, Waldmann A, Rudnicki M. Prevalence of urinary incontinence among women and analysis of potential risk factors in Germany and Denmark. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13149.

23.

Pedersen KM, Andersen JS, Sondergaard J. General practice and primary health care in Denmark. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(Suppl 1):S34–8. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2012.02.110216.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Burgio KL, Matthews KA, Engel BT. Prevalence, incidence and correlates of urinary incontinence in healthy, middle-aged women. J Urol. 1991;146(5):1255–9.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Elliott AM, McAteer A, Hannaford PC. Revisiting the symptom iceberg in today's primary care: results from a UK population survey. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-12-16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Shaw C, Tansey R, Jackson C, Hyde C, Allan R. Barriers to help seeking in people with urinary symptoms. Fam Pract. 2001;18(1):48–52.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Shaw C. A review of the psychosocial predictors of help-seeking behaviour and impact on quality of life in people with urinary incontinence. J Clin Nurs. 2001;10(1):15–24.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Wojtowicz U, Plaszewska-Zywko L, Stangel-Wojcikiewicz K, Basta A. Barriers in entering treatment among women with urinary incontinence. Ginekol Pol. 2014;85(5):342–7.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Campbell SM, Roland MO. Why do people consult the doctor? Fam Pract. 1996;13(1):75–83.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Mazloomdoost D, Kanter G, Chan RC, Deveaneau N, Wyman AM, Von Bargen EC, et al. Social networking and internet use among pelvic floor patients: a multicenter survey. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(5):654.e651–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.011.CrossRef

Title: Urinary incontinence among women—which personal and professional relations are involved? A population-based study
Authors: Isabella Raasthøj
Sandra Elnegaard
Marianne Rosendal
Dorte Ejg Jarbøl
Publication date: 01-09-2019
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3804-2

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Urinary incontinence among women—which personal and professional relations are involved? A population-based study

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 9/2019

Factors associated with pelvic floor disorders in Kersa District, eastern Ethiopia: a community-based study

Clinical outcomes on tension-releasing suture appendage on single-incision sling devices for postoperative voiding dysfunction involving undue tape tension

Introital ultrasound in the diagnosis of lower urinary tract symptoms following anti-incontinence surgery using a synthetic midurethral tape

Long-term subjective, clinical and sonographic outcomes after native-tissue and mesh-augmented posterior colporrhaphy

Transobturator mid-urethral sling in females with stress urinary incontinence and detrusor underactivity: effect on voiding phase

Utility of patient decision aids (PDA) in stress urinary incontinence surgery