Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 2/2019

01-02-2019 | Original Article

Enhanced recovery program for minimally invasive and vaginal urogynecologic surgery

Authors: Elisa Rodriguez Trowbridge, Sarah L. Evans, Bethany M. Sarosiek, Susan C. Modesitt, Dana L. Redick, Mohamed Tiouririne, Robert H. Thiele, Traci L. Hedrick, Kathie L. Hullfish

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) are evidenced-based interventions designed to standardize perioperative care and expedite recovery to baseline functional status after surgery. There remains a paucity of data addressing the effect of ERPs on pelvic reconstructive surgery patients.

Methods

An ERP was implemented at our institution including: patient counseling, carbohydrate loading, avoidance of opioids, goal-directed fluid resuscitation, immediate postoperative feeding and early ambulation. Patients undergoing elective pelvic reconstructive surgery before and after implementation of the ERP were identified in this cohort study.

Results

One hundred eighteen patients underwent pelvic reconstructive surgery within the ERP compared with 76 historic controls. Reductions were seen in length of hospital stay (29.9 vs. 27.9 h, p = 0.04), total morphine equivalents (37.4 vs. 19.4 mg, p < 0.01) and total intravenous fluids administered (2.7 l vs. 1.5 l, p < 0.0001). Hospital discharges before noon doubled (32.9 vs. 60.2%, p < 0.01). More patients in the ERP group ambulated on the day of surgery (17.1 vs. 73.7%, p < 0.01) and ambulated at least two times the day following surgery (34.2 vs. 72.9%, p < 0.01). No differences were seen in average pain scores (highest pain score 7.39 vs. 7.37, p = 0.95), hospital readmissions (3.9 vs. 3.4%, p = 0.84), or postoperative complications (6.58 vs. 8.47%, p = 0.79). Patient satisfaction significantly improved. ERP was not associated with an increase in 30-day total hospital costs.

Conclusions

Implementation of ERP for pelvic reconstructive surgery patients was associated with a reduced length of hospital stay, improved patient satisfaction, and decreased administration of intravenous fluids and opioids without an increase in complications, readmissions, or hospital costs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference ACOG Committee Opinion 444. Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2011;444. ACOG Committee Opinion 444. Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2011;444.
2.
go back to reference Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:606–17.CrossRefPubMed Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:606–17.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Thiele R, Rea K, Turrentine F, Friel C, Hassinger T, Goudreau B, et al. Standardization of care: impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(4):430–43.CrossRefPubMed Thiele R, Rea K, Turrentine F, Friel C, Hassinger T, Goudreau B, et al. Standardization of care: impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(4):430–43.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Yoong W, Sivashanmugarajan V, Relph S, Bell A, Fajemirokun E, Davies T, et al. Can enhanced recovery pathways improve outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy? Cohort control study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(1):83–9.CrossRefPubMed Yoong W, Sivashanmugarajan V, Relph S, Bell A, Fajemirokun E, Davies T, et al. Can enhanced recovery pathways improve outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy? Cohort control study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(1):83–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kroon U, Radstrom M, Hielte C, Dahlin C, Kroon L. Fast-track hysterectomy: a randomised, controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;151:203–7.CrossRefPubMed Kroon U, Radstrom M, Hielte C, Dahlin C, Kroon L. Fast-track hysterectomy: a randomised, controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;151:203–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Meyer L, Lasala J, Iniesta M, Nick A, Munsell M, Shi Q, et al. Effect of an enhanced recovery after surgery program on opioid use and patient-reported outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(2):281–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Meyer L, Lasala J, Iniesta M, Nick A, Munsell M, Shi Q, et al. Effect of an enhanced recovery after surgery program on opioid use and patient-reported outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(2):281–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Nelson G, Altman A, Nick A, Meyer L, Ramirez P, Achtari C, et al. Guidelines for pre- and intra-operative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations — part I. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;140:313–22.CrossRefPubMed Nelson G, Altman A, Nick A, Meyer L, Ramirez P, Achtari C, et al. Guidelines for pre- and intra-operative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations — part I. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;140:313–22.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sjetne S, Krogstad U, Ødegård S, Engh M. Improving quality by introducing enhanced recovery after surgery in a gynaecological department: consequences for ward nursing practice. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:236–40.CrossRefPubMed Sjetne S, Krogstad U, Ødegård S, Engh M. Improving quality by introducing enhanced recovery after surgery in a gynaecological department: consequences for ward nursing practice. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:236–40.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Wijk L, Franzen K, Ljungqvist O, Nilsson K. Implementing a structured enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol reduces length of stay after abdominal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93:749–59.CrossRefPubMed Wijk L, Franzen K, Ljungqvist O, Nilsson K. Implementing a structured enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol reduces length of stay after abdominal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93:749–59.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference de Groot J, van Es L, Maessen J, Dejong C, Kruitwagen R, Slangen B. Diffusion of enhanced recovery principles in gynecologic oncology surgery: is active implementation still necessary? Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134:570–5.CrossRefPubMed de Groot J, van Es L, Maessen J, Dejong C, Kruitwagen R, Slangen B. Diffusion of enhanced recovery principles in gynecologic oncology surgery: is active implementation still necessary? Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134:570–5.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Modesitt SC, Sarosiek BM, Trowbridge ER, Redick DL, Shah PM, Thiele RH, et al. Enhanced recovery implementation in major gynecologic surgeries: effect of care standardization. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(3):457–66.CrossRefPubMed Modesitt SC, Sarosiek BM, Trowbridge ER, Redick DL, Shah PM, Thiele RH, et al. Enhanced recovery implementation in major gynecologic surgeries: effect of care standardization. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(3):457–66.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Chapman J, Roddy E, Ueda S, Brooks R, Chen L, Chen L. Enhanced recovery pathways for improving outcomes after minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(1):138–44.CrossRefPubMed Chapman J, Roddy E, Ueda S, Brooks R, Chen L, Chen L. Enhanced recovery pathways for improving outcomes after minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(1):138–44.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wu JM, Kawasaki A, Hundley AF, Dieter AA, Myers ER, Sung VW. Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(3):230.e1–5.CrossRef Wu JM, Kawasaki A, Hundley AF, Dieter AA, Myers ER, Sung VW. Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(3):230.e1–5.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hughes S, Leary A, Zweizig S, Cain J. Surgery in elderly people: preoperative, operative and postoperative care to assist healing. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27:753–65.CrossRefPubMed Hughes S, Leary A, Zweizig S, Cain J. Surgery in elderly people: preoperative, operative and postoperative care to assist healing. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27:753–65.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Schmocker RK, Stafford LMC, Siy AB, Leverson GE, Winslow ER. Understanding the determinants of patient satisfaction with surgical care using the consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems surgical care survey (S-CAHPS). Surgery. 2015;6(1724):158. Schmocker RK, Stafford LMC, Siy AB, Leverson GE, Winslow ER. Understanding the determinants of patient satisfaction with surgical care using the consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems surgical care survey (S-CAHPS). Surgery. 2015;6(1724):158.
17.
go back to reference Bradshaw BG, Liu SS, Thirlby RC. Standardized perioperative care protocols and reduced length of stay after colon surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;186(5):501–6.CrossRef Bradshaw BG, Liu SS, Thirlby RC. Standardized perioperative care protocols and reduced length of stay after colon surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;186(5):501–6.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference NadlerA PEA, Victor JC, Aarts MA, Okrainec A, McLeod RS. Understanding surgical residents’ postoperative practices and barriers and enablers to the implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guideline. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(4):632–8.CrossRef NadlerA PEA, Victor JC, Aarts MA, Okrainec A, McLeod RS. Understanding surgical residents’ postoperative practices and barriers and enablers to the implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guideline. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(4):632–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Enhanced recovery program for minimally invasive and vaginal urogynecologic surgery
Authors
Elisa Rodriguez Trowbridge
Sarah L. Evans
Bethany M. Sarosiek
Susan C. Modesitt
Dana L. Redick
Mohamed Tiouririne
Robert H. Thiele
Traci L. Hedrick
Kathie L. Hullfish
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3794-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

International Urogynecology Journal 2/2019 Go to the issue