Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Urogynecology Journal
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 4/2019

Open Access 01-04-2019 | Original Article

The symptom of vaginal bulging in nulliparous women aged 25–64 years: a national cohort study

Authors: Maria Gyhagen, Jwan Al-Mukhtar Othman, Sigvard Åkervall, Ida Nilsson, Ian Milsom

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Vaginal bulging is considered the key symptom for genital organ prolapse. The aim was to investigate the age-related prevalence and frequency of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (sPOP) and other pelvic floor symptoms in nonpregnant nullipara aged 25–64 years.

Methods

This national postal and web-based questionnaire survey was conducted in 2014 and included four independent random samples of women aged 25–34, 35–44, 45–54, and 55–64 years. The association of sPOP with demographics and with other pelvic floor conditions and with clustering to other pelvic floor conditions, was presented in women with and without sPOP. Logistic regression was used to identify and rank variables associated with symptomatic prolapse.

Results

The response rate was 52% (n = 10,187) and 726 nullipara confirmed sPOP. Women with sPOP were younger (p < 0.001), shorter (p < 0.001), and more often overweight and obese (p < 0.01) compared with asymptomatic women. Previous surgery for prolapse was reported by 15 women only (0.16%). Symptomatic POP decreased from 9.8% in the youngest age group (25–34 years) to 6.1% in the oldest (55–64 years) (p < 0.0001). Symptomatic POP was more often experienced as bothersome (p = 0.012), and aggravated by straining and heavy lifting (p = 0.003), in older women. Vaginal/vulval chafing/rubbing feeling was most prevalent among the youngest 14.2%, decreasing to 7.8% among the oldest (<0.0001). This symptom occurred three to five times more often in those with sPOP (p < 0.0001). Clustering of pelvic floor symptoms was four times more prevalent in women with sPOP (23.2% versus 6.1%) (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The high prevalence of sPOP in this study was contradictory to most earlier reports, which have shown that genital prolapse is rare in nullipara. The explanation of our results may be the low probability of the clinical condition, the dominance of weak and infrequent symptoms, and not least clustering of alternative conditions mimicking sPOP.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Leijonhufvud Å, Lundholm C, Cnattingius S, Granath F, Andolf E, Altman D. Risks of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse surgery in relation to mode of childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(70):e1–6.
2.
Samuelsson EC, Victor AFT, Tibblin G, Svärdsudd KF. Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:299–305.CrossRefPubMed
3.
DeLancey JO. The hidden epidemic of pelvic floor dysfunction: achievable goals for improved prevention and treatment. Review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1488–95.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Norton P, Baker J, Sharp H, Warenski J. Genitourinary prolapse: its relationship with joint mobility. Neurourol Urodyn. 1990;9:321–2.
5.
Lo TS, Jaili S, Uy-Patrimonio MC, Karim NB, Ibrahim R. Transvaginal management of severe pelvic organ prolapse in nulliparous women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;43:543–50.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Wan L, Liu X. Delayed-onset advanced pelvic organ prolapse after spinal cord injury in a young, nulliparous woman. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:825–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Dietz HP, Clarke B. Prevalence of rectocele in young nulliparous women. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;45:391–4.CrossRef
8.
9.
Quiroz LH, White DE, Juarez D, Shobeiri SA. Age effects on pelvic floor symptoms in a cohort of nulliparous patients. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18:325–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Swift SE. The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:277–85.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Sze EHM, Hobbs G. Relation between vaginal birth and pelvic organ prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88:200–3.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Barber MD, Neubauer NL, Klein-Olarte V. Can we screen for pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination in epidemiologic studies? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:942–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Nygaard I, Barber MD, Kathryn L, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA. 2008;300:1311–6.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
14.
Durnea CM, Khashan AS, Kenny LC, Tabirca SS, O’Reilly BA. An insight into pelvic floor status in nulliparous women. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:337–45.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Tegerstedt G, Maehle-Schmidt M, Nyrén O, Hammarström M. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in a Swedish population. Int Urogynecol J. 2005;16:497–503.CrossRef
16.
Tegerstedt G, Miedel A, Maehle-Schmidt M, Nyrén O, Hammarström M. A short-form questionnaire identified genital organ prolapse. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:41–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Sandvik H, Hunskaar S, Seim A, Hermstad R, Vanvik A, Bratt H. Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993;47:497–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
18.
Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77–97.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:5–26.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Al-Mukhtar Othman J, Åkervall S, Milsom I, Gyhagen M. Urinary incontinence in nulliparous women aged 25–64 years: a national survey. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:149.e1–149.e11.CrossRef
21.
Cooper J, Annappa M, Dracocardos D, Cooper W, Sara Muller S, Mallen C. Prevalence of genital prolapse symptoms in primary care: a cross-sectional survey. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:505–10.CrossRefPubMed
22.
O'Boyle AL, Woodman PJ, O'Boyle JD, Davis GD, Swift SE. Pelvic organ support in nulliparous pregnant and nonpregnant women: a case control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:99–102.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Ellerkmann RM, Cundiff GW, Melick CF, Nihira MA, Leffler K, Bent AE. Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1332–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:372–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Tan JS, Lukacz ES, Menefee SA, Powell CR, Nager CW. Predictive value of prolapse symptoms: a large database study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16:203–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Ransohoff DF, Feinstein AR. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med. 1978;229:926–30.CrossRef
27.
Weber AM, Abrams P, Brubaker L, et al. The standardization of terminology for researchers in female pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12:178–86.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
28.
Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen T, Milsom I. Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG. 2013;120:152–60.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The symptom of vaginal bulging in nulliparous women aged 25–64 years: a national cohort study
Authors
Maria Gyhagen
Jwan Al-Mukhtar Othman
Sigvard Åkervall
Ida Nilsson
Ian Milsom
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3684-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

International Urogynecology Journal 4/2019 Go to the issue

Original Article

Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: comparison of two different techniques used in urology and gynecology

Original Article

Association between method of pelvic organ prolapse repair involving the vaginal apex and re-operation: a population-based, retrospective cohort study

Review Article

Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines

Original Article

Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh

Commentary

Commentary on the paper titled: “Partially absorbable mesh or native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled trial”

Original Article

Partially absorbable mesh or native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled trial