Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 11/2018

Open Access 01-11-2018 | Original Article

Effect of subsequent vaginal delivery on bowel symptoms and anorectal function in women who sustained a previous obstetric anal sphincter injury

Authors: Polly A. Jordan, Madhu Naidu, Ranee Thakar, Abdul H. Sultan

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 11/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Our primary objective was to prospectively evaluate anorectal symptoms, anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) in women who followed the recommended mode of subsequent delivery following index obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) using our unit’s standardised protocol. Our secondary objectives were to evaluate the role of internal anal sphincter defects and also to compare outcomes in a subgroup of symptomatic women with normal anorectal physiology.

Methods

This is a prospective follow-up study of pregnant women with previous OASIs who were counselled regarding subsequent mode of delivery between January 2003 and December 2014. Assessment involved the St Mark’s Incontinence Score (SMIS), anal manometry and EAUS at both antepartum and 3-month postpartum visits. Data were analysed using Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney U tests.

Results

Three hundred and fifty women attended the perineal clinic over the study period, of whom 122 met the inclusion criteria (99 vaginal delivery [VD], 23 caesarean section). No significant worsening of anorectal symptoms was observed following subsequent delivery in the VD group (p = 0.896), although a reduced squeeze pressure was observed at 3 months postpartum (p < 0.001). There were no new defects on EAUS in either group.

Conclusions

This study showed no significant worsening of bowel symptoms and sphincter integrity apart from lower squeeze pressures at 3 months postpartum in the VD group when our standardised protocol was used to recommend subsequent mode of delivery. In the absence of a randomised study, use of this protocol can aid clinicians in their decision-making.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell D, Edozien L, Mahmood T, Adams E, Richmond D, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120(12):1516–25.CrossRef Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell D, Edozien L, Mahmood T, Adams E, Richmond D, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120(12):1516–25.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Farrar D, Tuffnell DJ, Ramage C. Interventions for women in subsequent pregnancies following obstetric anal sphincter injury to reduce the risk of recurrent injury and associated harms. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;11:CD010374. Farrar D, Tuffnell DJ, Ramage C. Interventions for women in subsequent pregnancies following obstetric anal sphincter injury to reduce the risk of recurrent injury and associated harms. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;11:CD010374.
3.
go back to reference Edozien LC, Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, Mahmood TA, et al. Impact of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears at first birth on subsequent pregnancy outcomes: a cohort study. BJOG. 2014;121(13):1695–703.CrossRef Edozien LC, Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, Mahmood TA, et al. Impact of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears at first birth on subsequent pregnancy outcomes: a cohort study. BJOG. 2014;121(13):1695–703.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Boggs EW, Berger H, Urquia M, McDermott CD. Recurrence of obstetric third-degree and fourth-degree anal sphincter injuries. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(6):1128–34.CrossRef Boggs EW, Berger H, Urquia M, McDermott CD. Recurrence of obstetric third-degree and fourth-degree anal sphincter injuries. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(6):1128–34.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference LaCross A, Groff M, Smaldone A. Obstetric anal sphincter injury and anal incontinence following vaginal birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;60(1):37–47.CrossRef LaCross A, Groff M, Smaldone A. Obstetric anal sphincter injury and anal incontinence following vaginal birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;60(1):37–47.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Richter HE, Nager CW, Burgio KL, Whitworth R, Weidner AC, Schaffer J, et al. Incidence and predictors of anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(4):182–9.CrossRef Richter HE, Nager CW, Burgio KL, Whitworth R, Weidner AC, Schaffer J, et al. Incidence and predictors of anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(4):182–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference RCOG. The management of third and fourth degree perineal tears: Green-top Guidelines no.29. 2007. RCOG. The management of third and fourth degree perineal tears: Green-top Guidelines no.29. 2007.
9.
go back to reference Skinner EM, Dietz HP. Psychological and somatic sequelae of traumatic vaginal delivery: a literature review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;55(4):309–14.CrossRef Skinner EM, Dietz HP. Psychological and somatic sequelae of traumatic vaginal delivery: a literature review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;55(4):309–14.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD. Caesarean section: a safe operation? J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;14(2):86–90.CrossRef Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD. Caesarean section: a safe operation? J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;14(2):86–90.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Scheer I, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Mode of delivery after previous obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)—a reappraisal? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(9):1095–101.CrossRef Scheer I, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Mode of delivery after previous obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)—a reappraisal? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(9):1095–101.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Karmarkar R, Bhide A, Digesu A, Khullar V, Fernando R. Mode of delivery after obstetric anal sphincter injury. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;194:7–10.CrossRef Karmarkar R, Bhide A, Digesu A, Khullar V, Fernando R. Mode of delivery after obstetric anal sphincter injury. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;194:7–10.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sultan AH. Editorial: obstetric perineal injury and anal incontinence. Clin Risk. 1999;5(5):193–6. Sultan AH. Editorial: obstetric perineal injury and anal incontinence. Clin Risk. 1999;5(5):193–6.
14.
go back to reference Sultan AH, Monga A, Lee J, Emmanuel A, Norton C, Santoro G, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female anorectal dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(1):5–31.CrossRef Sultan AH, Monga A, Lee J, Emmanuel A, Norton C, Santoro G, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female anorectal dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(1):5–31.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(26):1905–11.CrossRef Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(26):1905–11.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut. 1999;44(1):77–80.CrossRef Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut. 1999;44(1):77–80.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Elenskaia K, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Scheer I, Beggs A. The effect of pregnancy and childbirth on pelvic floor muscle function. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(11):1421–7.CrossRef Elenskaia K, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Scheer I, Beggs A. The effect of pregnancy and childbirth on pelvic floor muscle function. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(11):1421–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick M, Cassidy M, Barassaud ML, Hehir MP, Hanly AM. Does anal sphincter injury preclude subsequent vaginal delivery? Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol. 2016;198:30–4.CrossRef Fitzpatrick M, Cassidy M, Barassaud ML, Hehir MP, Hanly AM. Does anal sphincter injury preclude subsequent vaginal delivery? Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol. 2016;198:30–4.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Evans C. Management of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in subsequent pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34:486–8.CrossRef Evans C. Management of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in subsequent pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34:486–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sangalli MR, Floris L, Faltin D, Weil A. Anal incontinence in women with third or fourth degree perineal tears and subsequent vaginal deliveries. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;40(3):244–8.CrossRef Sangalli MR, Floris L, Faltin D, Weil A. Anal incontinence in women with third or fourth degree perineal tears and subsequent vaginal deliveries. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;40(3):244–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ismail SI. The management of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): a national postal questionnaire survey in hospitals in the U.K. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;35(3):229–34.CrossRef Ismail SI. The management of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): a national postal questionnaire survey in hospitals in the U.K. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;35(3):229–34.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sioutis D, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Overdiagnosis and rising rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): time for reappraisal. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;50(5):642–7.CrossRef Sioutis D, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Overdiagnosis and rising rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): time for reappraisal. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;50(5):642–7.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Roos AM, Abdool Z, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Predicting anal sphincter defects: the value of clinical examination and manometry. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(6):755–63.CrossRef Roos AM, Abdool Z, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Predicting anal sphincter defects: the value of clinical examination and manometry. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(6):755–63.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Fernando RJ, Sultan AH, Radley S, Jones PW, Johanson RB. Management of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review & national practice survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2(1):9.CrossRef Fernando RJ, Sultan AH, Radley S, Jones PW, Johanson RB. Management of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review & national practice survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2(1):9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of subsequent vaginal delivery on bowel symptoms and anorectal function in women who sustained a previous obstetric anal sphincter injury
Authors
Polly A. Jordan
Madhu Naidu
Ranee Thakar
Abdul H. Sultan
Publication date
01-11-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3601-y

Other articles of this Issue 11/2018

International Urogynecology Journal 11/2018 Go to the issue