Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 4/2018

01-04-2018 | Letter to the Editor

Comment on “Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis”

Authors: Renée J. Detollenaere, Hugo W. F. van Eijndhoven

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

Dear Editor, …
Literature
1.
go back to reference De Oliveira SA, Fonseca MCM, Bortolini MAT, Girão MJBC, Roque MT, Castro RA. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;208(11):1617–30.CrossRef De Oliveira SA, Fonseca MCM, Bortolini MAT, Girão MJBC, Roque MT, Castro RA. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;208(11):1617–30.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kapoor S, Sivanesan K, Kapoor V, Veerasingham M. Comment on "Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis". Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(11):1761. Kapoor S, Sivanesan K, Kapoor V, Veerasingham M. Comment on "Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis". Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(11):1761.
3.
go back to reference De Oliveira SA, Bortolini MAT, Castro RA. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analyses. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(11):1763. De Oliveira SA, Bortolini MAT, Castro RA. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analyses. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(11):1763.
4.
go back to reference Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, et al. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h3717. Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, et al. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h3717.
5.
go back to reference Dietz V, van der Vaart CH, van der Graaf Y, Heintz P, Schraffordt Koops SE. One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(2):209–16. Dietz V, van der Vaart CH, van der Graaf Y, Heintz P, Schraffordt Koops SE. One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(2):209–16.
Metadata
Title
Comment on “Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis”
Authors
Renée J. Detollenaere
Hugo W. F. van Eijndhoven
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3553-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

International Urogynecology Journal 4/2018 Go to the issue