Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 10/2018

01-10-2018 | Original Article

Uterus-sparing vaginolaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical pelvic organ prolapse

Authors: Atef Darwish, Mostafa Bahlol, AbdelGhafar Ahmad, Mohamed Fekry

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 10/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Our aim was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of a vaginolaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (VLS) technique for treating apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Materials and methods

This was a prospective interventional case series (design classification: Canadian Task Force II3) performed in the endoscopic unit of a tertiary care referral facility and university hospital. We assessed 15 symptomatic parous women with stage ≥2 apical POP according to the POP Quantification (POP-Q) classification. Interventions comprised posterior colpotomy with mesh fixation to the uterosacral ligaments and the back of the uterus that was further fixed to the anterior longitudinal ligament of the sacrum using a tacker via laparoscopy.

Results

The main outcome was a significant postoperative improvement in prolapse and resultant improvement in quality of life (QoL) after VLS. Six patients required concomitant reconstructive procedures. Mean operative time for the vaginal phase was 8.54 ± 3.10 (7–12) min and 32.36 ± 8.2 (27–41) min. for the laparoscopic phase Mean duration of VLS ranged from 30 to 50 min. At the 6-months follow-up, the procedure was successful in 14 of 15 patients (93.34%); one woman (6.66%) presented with recurrence at a lower stage. Neither mesh complications nor sacral ostitis were encountered. There was significant improvement in vaginal symptoms, sexual well-being, QoL, and clinical staging after the procedure.

Conclusion

By eliminating all forms of intraperitoneal suturing, performing a posterior colpotomy, and the advent of tackers without evidence of sacral ostitis, VLS seems to be a simple, feasible, effective, and fast approach for treating POP.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501.CrossRef Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mawajdeh SM, Al-Qutob RJ, Farag A. Prevalence and risk factors of genital prolapse. A multicenter study. Saudi Med J. 2003;24(2):161–5.PubMed Mawajdeh SM, Al-Qutob RJ, Farag A. Prevalence and risk factors of genital prolapse. A multicenter study. Saudi Med J. 2003;24(2):161–5.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Dieter AA, Wilkins MF, Wu JM. Epidemiological trends and future care needs for pelvic floor disorders. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27(5):380–4.CrossRef Dieter AA, Wilkins MF, Wu JM. Epidemiological trends and future care needs for pelvic floor disorders. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27(5):380–4.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Clark AL, Gregory T, Smith VJ, Edwards R. Epidemiologic evaluation of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(5):1261–7.CrossRef Clark AL, Gregory T, Smith VJ, Edwards R. Epidemiologic evaluation of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(5):1261–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nygaad IE, Mc Creery R, Brubaker L. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy :a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;104:805–23.CrossRef Nygaad IE, Mc Creery R, Brubaker L. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy :a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;104:805–23.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization ofterminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floordysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.CrossRef Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization ofterminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floordysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Price N, Jackson SR, Avery K, Brookes ST, Abrams P. Development and psychometric evaluation of the ICIQ vaginal symptoms questionnaire: the ICIQ-VS. BJOG. 2006;113:700–12.CrossRef Price N, Jackson SR, Avery K, Brookes ST, Abrams P. Development and psychometric evaluation of the ICIQ vaginal symptoms questionnaire: the ICIQ-VS. BJOG. 2006;113:700–12.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Downing KT. Uterine Prolapse: from antiquity to today. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:1–9.CrossRef Downing KT. Uterine Prolapse: from antiquity to today. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:1–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference DeLancey JO, Morley GW. Total colpocleisis for vaginal eversion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(6):1228–32.CrossRef DeLancey JO, Morley GW. Total colpocleisis for vaginal eversion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(6):1228–32.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dällenbach P. To mesh or not to mesh: a review of pelvic organ reconstructive surgery. Int J Womens Health 2015; 7: 331–343. Dällenbach P. To mesh or not to mesh: a review of pelvic organ reconstructive surgery. Int J Womens Health 2015; 7: 331–343.
11.
go back to reference Scarpero HM, Cespedes RD, Winters JC. Transabdominal approach to repair of vaginal vault prolapse. Tech Urol. 2001;7(2):139–45.PubMed Scarpero HM, Cespedes RD, Winters JC. Transabdominal approach to repair of vaginal vault prolapse. Tech Urol. 2001;7(2):139–45.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Pan K, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Xu H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;132(3):284–91.CrossRef Pan K, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Xu H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;132(3):284–91.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Elvira BV, Brătilă PC, Andra-Teodora N. Vaginally-assisted laparoscopic Hysterosacropexy for advanced Utero-vaginal Prolapse: a series of 32 patients. ARS Medica Tomitana. 2014;2(77):63–7.CrossRef Elvira BV, Brătilă PC, Andra-Teodora N. Vaginally-assisted laparoscopic Hysterosacropexy for advanced Utero-vaginal Prolapse: a series of 32 patients. ARS Medica Tomitana. 2014;2(77):63–7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Campos S, Billone V, Durão M, Beguinot M. BourdelN, Rabischong B, Canis M, Botchorishvili R. Complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: as harmless as they seem? Acta Obstet Ginecol Port. 2016;10(1):21–31. Campos S, Billone V, Durão M, Beguinot M. BourdelN, Rabischong B, Canis M, Botchorishvili R. Complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: as harmless as they seem? Acta Obstet Ginecol Port. 2016;10(1):21–31.
15.
go back to reference Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, van Eijndhoven HW. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised noninferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h3717.CrossRef Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, van Eijndhoven HW. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised noninferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h3717.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Frick AC, Barber MD, Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Jelovsek JE, Walters MD. Attitudes toward hysterectomy in women undergoing evaluation for uterovaginal prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19(2):103–9.CrossRef Frick AC, Barber MD, Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Jelovsek JE, Walters MD. Attitudes toward hysterectomy in women undergoing evaluation for uterovaginal prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19(2):103–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA. 2013;309(19):2016–24.CrossRef Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA. 2013;309(19):2016–24.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Marjoribanks J. Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2:Cd012079.PubMed Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Marjoribanks J. Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2:Cd012079.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Uterus-sparing vaginolaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical pelvic organ prolapse
Authors
Atef Darwish
Mostafa Bahlol
AbdelGhafar Ahmad
Mohamed Fekry
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3511-4

Other articles of this Issue 10/2018

International Urogynecology Journal 10/2018 Go to the issue