Top

International Urogynecology Journal

Published in:

01-04-2018 | IUJ Video

Extravesical robotic ureteral reimplantation for ureterovaginal fistula

Authors: Brian J. Linder, Igor Frank, John A. Occhino

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 4/2018

Abstract

Introduction

We present a video describing the technical considerations for performing an extravesical robotic ureteral reimplantation.

Methods

A 55-year old woman presented with urinary incontinence secondary to a ureterovaginal fistula after robotic-assisted hysterectomy. After failure of more conservative measures, she proceeded to a robotic ureteral reimplantation. Following port placement, the ureter is identified at the level of the iliac vessels and dissected circumferentially. The ureter is dissected free to the level of the ureterovaginal fistula, transected, and the distal remnant ligated. The ureter is spatulated, a cystotomy created, and a running anastomosis with mucosa-to-mucosa apposition performed over a stent. Care is taken to ensure it is tension free. The integrity of the anastomosis is tested with retrograde filling of the bladder. Postoperatively, a drainage catheter is left to allow for adequate healing. Follow-up imaging is performed to ensure a patent anastomosis.

Results

The patient had an uncomplicated postoperative course. A cystogram showed adequate healing at 10 days, and the stent was removed at 6 weeks. A follow-up renal ultrasound 6 weeks later showed no hydronephrosis.

Conclusions

Extravesical robotic ureteral reimplantation is a useful technique for managing ureterovaginal fistula; here we highlight pertinent technical considerations.

Available only for authorised users

Morey AF, Brandes S, Dugi DD 3rd, Armstrong JH, Breyer BN, Broghammer JA, et al., American Urological A. Urotrauma: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2014;192(2):327–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.004.

Burks FN, Santucci RA. Management of iatrogenic ureteral injury. Ther Adv Urol. 2014;6(3):115–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287214526767.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Warwick RT, Worth PH. The psoas bladder-hitch procedure for the replacement of the lower third of the ureter. Br J Urol. 1969;41(6):701–9.CrossRefPubMed

Gellhaus PT, Bhandari A, Monn MF, Gardner TA, Kanagarajah P, Reilly CE, et al. Robotic management of genitourinary injuries from obstetric and gynaecological operations: a multi-institutional report of outcomes. BJU Int. 2015;115(3):430–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12785.

Musch M, Hohenhorst L, Pailliart A, Loewen H, Davoudi Y, Kroepfl D. Robot-assisted reconstructive surgery of the distal ureter: single institution experience in 16 patients. BJU Int. 2013;111(5):773–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11673.x.CrossRefPubMed

Hemal AK, Nayyar R, Gupta NP, Dorairajan LN. Experience with robot assisted laparoscopic surgery for upper and lower benign and malignant ureteral pathologies. Urology. 2010;76(6):1387–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.01.044.CrossRefPubMed

McClung C, Gorbonos A. Ureteral reimplantation in adults: open versus robotic. J Urol. 2014;192(4):1023–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.020.CrossRefPubMed

Patil NN, Mottrie A, Sundaram B, Patel VR. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with psoas hitch: a multi-institutional, multinational evaluation. Urology. 2008;72(1):47–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.097. discussion 50CrossRefPubMed

Packiam VT, Cohen AJ, Nottingham CU, Pariser JJ, Faris SF, Bales GT. Open Vs minimally invasive adult Ureteral Reimplantation: analysis of 30-day outcomes in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Urology. 2016;94:123–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.05.025.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Pantuck AJ, Han KR, Perrotti M, Weiss RE, Cummings KB. Ureteroenteric anastomosis in continent urinary diversion: long-term results and complications of direct versus nonrefluxing techniques. J Urol. 2000;163(2):450–5.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Extravesical robotic ureteral reimplantation for ureterovaginal fistula
Authors: Brian J. Linder
Igor Frank
John A. Occhino
Publication date: 01-04-2018
Publisher: Springer London
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3459-4

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Extravesical robotic ureteral reimplantation for ureterovaginal fistula

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Treatment of stress urinary incontinence with a mobile app

Urinary incontinence among Muslim women in Israel: risk factors and help-seeking behavior

Changes in voiding function after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: a cohort study of 76 cases

Commentary on: Influence of body mass index on short-term subjective improvement and risk of reoperation after mid-urethral sling surgery

Prevalence and predictors of overactive bladder in nonpregnant nulliparous women below 65 years of age

Effect of pulsed magnetic stimulation on quality of life of female patients with stress urinary incontinence: an IDEAL-D stage 2b study