Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 8/2018

01-08-2018 | Original Article

Discontinuation rate and adverse events after 1 year of vaginal pessary use in women with pelvic organ prolapse

Authors: Theerarat Yimphong, Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan, Pranom Buppasiri, Chompilas Chongsomchai, Supparaluck Kanchaiyaphum

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

To ascertain the rate of discontinuation after vaginal pessary use among pelvic organ prolapse patients.

Methods

We enrolled women suffering from pelvic organ prolapse who opted to use vaginal pessary as the first line of treatment and were fitted with a pessary at the urogynecological clinic in Khon Kaen University’s Srinagarind Hospital (Thailand) during the period between 2010 and 2016. Patients’ medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were contacted by telephone if there were missing data or if more information was required.

Results

One hundred and forty women were included. The median age was 71.5 years (interquartile = 65.0, 77.0) and normal vaginal parity was 4.0 (interquartile =3.0, 6.0). The mean ± SD of BMI was 23.5± 3.6 kg/m2. Most of the women enrolled in the study (97.9%) were postmenopausal and many were at an advanced stage of prolapse (73.6%). Support pessaries were the most common treatment (95.0%). The discontinuation rate of pessary use after 1 year was 16.1%. The most common reason for discontinuing the vaginal pessary was frequent expulsion (26.3%). Abnormal vaginal discharge was the most common adverse effect after pessary insertion (17.1%). Lower BMI and history of hysterectomy were the significant risk factors for discontinuation of pessary use (0.76 [95%CI 0.62–0.93] and 15.89 [95%CI 1.67–151.02] respectively).

Conclusions

The discontinuation rate of pessary use in the case of pelvic organ prolapse was low after 1 year. Abnormal vaginal discharge was the most common adverse side effect. Lower BMI and history of hysterectomy were factors significantly associated with the discontinuation.
Literature
2.
4.
go back to reference Trowbridge ER, Fultz NH, Patel DA, DeLancey JO, Fenner DE. Distribution of pelvic organ support measures in a population-based sample of middle-aged, community-dwelling African American and white women in southeastern Michigan. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:548.e1–6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.054.CrossRef Trowbridge ER, Fultz NH, Patel DA, DeLancey JO, Fenner DE. Distribution of pelvic organ support measures in a population-based sample of middle-aged, community-dwelling African American and white women in southeastern Michigan. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:548.e1–6. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ajog.​2008.​01.​054.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chuenchompoonut V, Bunyavejchevin S, Wisawasukmongchol W, Taechakraichana N. Prevalence of genital prolapse in Thai menopausal women (using new standardization classification). J Med Assoc Thail. 2005;88:1–4. Chuenchompoonut V, Bunyavejchevin S, Wisawasukmongchol W, Taechakraichana N. Prevalence of genital prolapse in Thai menopausal women (using new standardization classification). J Med Assoc Thail. 2005;88:1–4.
13.
go back to reference Wolff B, Williams K, Winkler A, Lind L, Shalom D. Pessary types and discontinuation rates in patients with advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;8(7):993–7. doi:10.1007/s00192-016-3228-9. Wolff B, Williams K, Winkler A, Lind L, Shalom D. Pessary types and discontinuation rates in patients with advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;8(7):993–7. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-016-3228-9.
14.
go back to reference Pott-Grinstein E, Newcomer JR. Gynecologists' patterns of prescribing pessaries. J Reprod Med. 2001;46:205–8.PubMed Pott-Grinstein E, Newcomer JR. Gynecologists' patterns of prescribing pessaries. J Reprod Med. 2001;46:205–8.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Sokol ER, Jackson ND, Myers DL. Patient characteristics that are associated with continued pessary use versus surgery after 1 year. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:159–64.CrossRefPubMed Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Sokol ER, Jackson ND, Myers DL. Patient characteristics that are associated with continued pessary use versus surgery after 1 year. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:159–64.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Sulak PJ, Kuehl TJ, Shull BL. Vaginal pessaries and their use in pelvic relaxation. J Reprod Med. 1993;38:919–23.PubMed Sulak PJ, Kuehl TJ, Shull BL. Vaginal pessaries and their use in pelvic relaxation. J Reprod Med. 1993;38:919–23.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Wu V, Farrell SA, Baskett TF, Flowerdew G. A simplified protocol for pessary management. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:990–4.CrossRefPubMed Wu V, Farrell SA, Baskett TF, Flowerdew G. A simplified protocol for pessary management. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:990–4.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wang Y, Yang J, Han J, Zhu F, Zhang K, Yao Y. Factors influencing therapy decision in patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015;50:112–5.PubMed Wang Y, Yang J, Han J, Zhu F, Zhang K, Yao Y. Factors influencing therapy decision in patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015;50:112–5.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Yang JF, Han JS, Zhu FL, Wang YT, Yao Y, Qiao J. Clinical study on silicone pessary in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2012;47:487–91.PubMed Yang JF, Han JS, Zhu FL, Wang YT, Yao Y, Qiao J. Clinical study on silicone pessary in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2012;47:487–91.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Discontinuation rate and adverse events after 1 year of vaginal pessary use in women with pelvic organ prolapse
Authors
Theerarat Yimphong
Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan
Pranom Buppasiri
Chompilas Chongsomchai
Supparaluck Kanchaiyaphum
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3445-x

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

International Urogynecology Journal 8/2018 Go to the issue