Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 10/2017

01-10-2017 | Original Article

Suburethral sling procedures in the United States: complications, readmission, and reoperation

Authors: Katie Propst, David M. O’Sullivan, Paul K. Tulikangas

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Hospital readmission is increasingly used as a measure of quality care. Our objective was to evaluate the rate of readmission and associated factors in women undergoing suburethral sling placement in the USA.

Methods

This is a cohort study of suburethral sling procedures performed in the USA from 2012 to 2014 using the American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The database was queried for suburethral sling procedures. Records were excluded if concomitant surgery had been performed. Patient and surgical characteristics were evaluated for association with readmission using Chi-squared test for categorical variables and Student’s t test for continuous variables. All results yielding p < 0.05 were deemed statistically significant.

Results

A total of 7,117 suburethral sling procedures were identified. There were 83 (1.16%) hospital readmissions. Those who were readmitted tended to be older (p = 0.011), non-Hispanic (p = 0.04), smokers (p < 0.001), and have an American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System score of 3 or 4 (p = 0.001). A history of bleeding disorder (p < 0.001), congestive heart failure (p < 0.001), or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p < 0.001) was associated with readmission. Fifty-four (0.75%) patients underwent reoperation within 30 days of suburethral sling placement. The most common reoperation procedure was sling excision (20 patients). The most common complication was urinary tract infection, which occurred in 189 patients (2.7%).

Conclusions

Suburethral sling placement is a safe procedure with a low rate of readmissions, reoperations, and complications. Consistent with other types of surgery, infection is the most common post-operative complication.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Barber MD, Gustilo-Ashby AM, Chen CCG, Kaplan P, Paraiso MFR, Walters MD. Perioperative complications and adverse events of the MONARC transobturator tape, compared with the tension-free vaginal tape. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1820–5.CrossRefPubMed Barber MD, Gustilo-Ashby AM, Chen CCG, Kaplan P, Paraiso MFR, Walters MD. Perioperative complications and adverse events of the MONARC transobturator tape, compared with the tension-free vaginal tape. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1820–5.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Brubaker L, Norton PA, Albo ME, et al. Adverse events over two years after retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery: findings from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(5):498.e1–6.CrossRef Brubaker L, Norton PA, Albo ME, et al. Adverse events over two years after retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery: findings from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(5):498.e1–6.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kuuva N, Nilsson CG. A nationwide analysis of complications associated with the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81:72–7.CrossRefPubMed Kuuva N, Nilsson CG. A nationwide analysis of complications associated with the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81:72–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sultana CJ, Campbell JW, Pisanelli WS, Sivinski L, Rimm AA. Morbidity and mortality of incontinence surgery in elderly women: an analysis of Medicare data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(2):344–8.CrossRefPubMed Sultana CJ, Campbell JW, Pisanelli WS, Sivinski L, Rimm AA. Morbidity and mortality of incontinence surgery in elderly women: an analysis of Medicare data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(2):344–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Merkow RP, Ju MH, Chung JW, et al. Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United States. JAMA. 2015;313(5):483–95.CrossRefPubMed Merkow RP, Ju MH, Chung JW, et al. Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United States. JAMA. 2015;313(5):483–95.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Erekson EA, Lopes VV, Raker CA, Sung VW. Ambulatory procedures for female pelvic floor disorders in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(5):497.e1–5.CrossRef Erekson EA, Lopes VV, Raker CA, Sung VW. Ambulatory procedures for female pelvic floor disorders in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(5):497.e1–5.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Davé BA, Jaber C, Leader-Cramer A, et al. Effect of anesthesia type on perioperative outcomes with a midurethral sling. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(9):1327–32.CrossRefPubMed Davé BA, Jaber C, Leader-Cramer A, et al. Effect of anesthesia type on perioperative outcomes with a midurethral sling. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(9):1327–32.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Suburethral sling procedures in the United States: complications, readmission, and reoperation
Authors
Katie Propst
David M. O’Sullivan
Paul K. Tulikangas
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3293-8

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

International Urogynecology Journal 10/2017 Go to the issue