Published in:
01-10-2017 | Original Article
Effect of pessary use on hydronephrosis in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse: a self-selected interventional trial
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 10/2017
Login to get accessAbstract
Introduction and hypothesis
The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of women who demonstrate improvement in hydronephrosis after pessary placement for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
Methods
This was a planned subset analysis of a prospective study on the prevalence of hydronephrosis in women with advanced POP. Women with anterior or apical POP ≥1 cm past the hymenal remnant were enrolled and screened for hydronephrosis. All were offered expectant management, pessary placement or surgery. Participants self-selecting pessary placement were compared with those with expectant management during the study period. A follow-up ultrasound scan was performed after >3 weeks of treatment. The proportions of participants demonstrating cure/improvement were compared using Fisher’s exact test.
Results
Of 180 participants enrolled, 55 had hydronephrosis for a prevalence of 30.6% (95% CI 24.3–37.6%). Of those with hydronephrosis, 39 (70.8%) chose pessary placement while 16 (30.2%) declined. A follow-up ultrasound scan was performed in 89% of participants at a median of 77 days (interquartile range 49–99 days). Intention-to-treat analysis showed no difference in improvement or resolution of hydronephrosis between women who accepted and those who declined pessary placement (p = 0.43). However, of 22 women successfully using a pessary, 77.3% showed improvement or cure, compared with 29.6% of 27 women not using a pessary (p = 0.003).
Conclusions
Successful pessary use improved hydronephrosis in over 75% of women with advanced POP. Approximately 39% of women with prolapse did not comply with pessary use and did not demonstrate hydronephrosis improvement.