Top

International Urogynecology Journal

Published in:

01-03-2017 | Original Article

Reducing obstetric anal sphincter injuries using perineal support: our preliminary experience

Authors: Madhu Naidu, Abdul H. Sultan, Ranee Thakar

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 3/2017

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) are associated with significant short-term and long-term morbidity. Over the past decade, there has been a steady rise in the rate of OASIs. There is therefore a compelling need to identify strategies to minimize OASIs. The objective of this study was to determine if perineal support at the time of vaginal delivery can reduce the incidence and severity of OASIs.

Methods

All labour ward staff including midwives and doctors were invited to train in the technique of perineal support during vaginal delivery. Two experts from Norway conducted workshops with practical hands-on training on pelvic models. The midwives and doctors underwent further training with women in labour, and mandatory training was continued within the department. All midwives and doctors were instructed to support the perineum during both spontaneous and assisted vaginal delivery.

Results

From April 2011 to November 2014, 11,135 women underwent vaginal delivery. The OASI rate decreased from 4.7 % to 4.1 % (p = 0.11). There was a significant reduction (0.9 % to 0.3 %, p < 0.001) in 3c third-degree and fourth-degree tears (major OASIs). In a multivariate analysis, perineal support was associated with a significant reduction in the rates of OASIs (23 %; OR 0.77, 95 % CI 0.63 – 0.95, p = 0.01]) and major OASIs (71 %; OR 0.34, 95 % CI 0.17 – 0.69, p = 0.03).

Conclusions

This interventional study showed that perineal support during vaginal delivery can reduce the risk of major OASIs. With sustained reinforcement of this intervention programme, we anticipate a further reduction in OASI rates.

Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell D, Edozien L, Mahmood T, Adams E, Richmond D, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120(12):1516–1525. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12363.CrossRefPubMed

Tyagi V, Perera M, Guerrero K. Trends in obstetric anal sphincter injuries over 10 years. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33(8):844–849. doi:10.3109/01443615.2013.831045.CrossRefPubMed

Ampt A, Ford J, Roberts C, Morris J. Trends in obstetric anal sphincter injuries and associated risk factors for vaginal singleton term births in New South Wales 2001–2009. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;53(1):9–16. doi:10.1111/ajo.12038.CrossRefPubMed

Raisanen S, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Gissler M, Heinonen S. The increased incidence of obstetric anal sphincter rupture – an emerging trend in Finland. Prev Med. 2009;49(6):535–540. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.10.005.CrossRefPubMed

LaCross A, Groff M, Smaldone A. Obstetric anal sphincter injury and anal incontinence following vaginal birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;60(1):37–47. doi:10.1111/jmwh.12283.CrossRefPubMed

Radestad I, Olsson A, Nissen E, Rubertsson C. Tears in the vagina, perineum, sphincter ani, and rectum and first sexual intercourse after childbirth: a nationwide follow-up. Birth. 2008;35(2):98–106. doi:10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00222.x.CrossRefPubMed

Roos AM, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): does the grade of tear matter? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36(3):368–374. doi:10.1002/uog.7512.CrossRefPubMed

Edozien LC, Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, Mahmood TA, et al. Impact of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears at first birth on subsequent pregnancy outcomes: a cohort study. BJOG. 2014;121(13):1695–1703. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12886.CrossRefPubMed

Pirhonen J, Grenman S, Haadem K, Gudmundsson S, Lindqvist P, Siihola S, et al. Frequency of anal sphincter rupture at delivery in Sweden and Finland – result of difference in manual help to the baby’s head. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77(10):974–977.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Laine K, Pirhonen T, Rolland R, Pirhonen J. Decreasing the incidence of anal sphincter tears during delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(5):1053–7. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816c4402.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Laine K, Skjeldestad FE, Sandvik L, Staff AC. Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort study. BMJ Open. 2012;2(5):e001649. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001649.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

McPherson KC, Beggs AD, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Can the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) be predicted using a risk-scoring system? BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:471. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-471.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Aasheim V, Nilsen A, Lukasse M, Reinar L. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12:CD006672. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006672.pub2.

14.

Hals E, Oian P, Pirhonen T, Gissler M, Hjelle S, Nilsen EB, et al. A multicenter interventional program to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tears. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(4):901–908. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eda77a.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Räisänen S, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Gissler M, Heinonen S. High episiotomy rate protects from obstetric anal sphincter ruptures: a birth register-study on delivery intervention policies in Finland. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(5):457–463. doi:10.1177/1403494811404276.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Karbanova J, Rusavy Z, Betincova L, Jansova M, Parizek A, Kalis V. Clinical evaluation of peripartum outcomes of mediolateral versus lateral episiotomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;124(1):72–76. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.07.011.CrossRefPubMed

17.

O’Mahony F, Hofmeyr GJ, Menon V. Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;11:CD005455. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005455.pub2.

18.

de Vogel J, van der Leeuw-van Beek A, Gietelink D, Vujkovic M, de Leeuw JW, van Bavel J, et al. The effect of a mediolateral episiotomy during operative vaginal delivery on the risk of developing obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(5):4040–4045. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.008.CrossRef

19.

Mayerhofer K, Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Rabl M, Kaider A, Wagenbichler P, et al. Traditional care of the perineum during birth. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study of 1,076 women. J Reprod Med. 2002;6(47):5.

20.

McCandlish R, Bowler U, van Asten H, Berridge G, Winter C, Sames L, et al. A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. BJOG. 1998;105(12):1262–1272.CrossRef

21.

Trochez R, Waterfield M, Freeman RM. Hands on or hands off the perineum: a survey of care of the perineum in labour (HOOPS). Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(10):1279–1285. doi:10.1007/s00192-011-1454-8.CrossRefPubMed

22.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. Clinical guideline 190. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2014.

23.

East CE, Lau R, Biro MA. Midwives׳ and doctors׳ perceptions of their preparation for and practice in managing the perineum in the second stage of labour: a cross-sectional survey. Midwifery. 2015;31(1):122–131.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Bulchandani S, Watts E, Sucharitha A, Yates D, Ismail KM. Manual perineal support at the time of childbirth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2015;122(9):1157–1165. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13431.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Ismail K, Paschetta E, Papoutsis D, Freeman R. Perineal support and risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a Delphi survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(2):165–174. doi:10.1111/aogs.12547.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Royal College of Midwives. Report of a survey exploring the position of midwives’ hands during the birth of the baby’s head. London: Royal College of Midwives; 2012. https://www.rcm.org.uk/sites/default/files/Perineal%20Audit%20Report%202014.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2016.

27.

Taithongchai A, Naidu M, Sultan A, Thakar R. Survey of current practice on perineal support among United Kingdom obstetric and gynaecology trainees. BJOG. 2015;122:55–6. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13384.

28.

Jansova M, Kalis V, Lobovsky L, Hyncik L, Karbanova J, Rusavy Z. The role of thumb and index finger placement in manual perineal protection. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(11):1533–1540. doi:10.1007/s00192-014-2425-7.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The OASI Care Bundle Project. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2015. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/audit-quality-improvement/third--and-fourth-degree-tears-project/. Accessed 5 Oct 2016.

Title: Reducing obstetric anal sphincter injuries using perineal support: our preliminary experience
Authors: Madhu Naidu
Abdul H. Sultan
Ranee Thakar
Publication date: 01-03-2017
Publisher: Springer London
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3176-4

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Reducing obstetric anal sphincter injuries using perineal support: our preliminary experience

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Do patient characteristics impact the relationship between anatomic prolapse and vaginal bulge symptoms?

An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool?

Does BMI, gender or age affect efficacy/tolerability of solifenacin in the management of overactive bladder?

Effects of laser procedure for female urodynamic stress incontinence on pad weight, urodynamics, and sexual function

Treatment of vaginal stenosis with fasciocutaneous Singapore flap

Why do we argue about route of hysterectomy? A call for dialogue