Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 3/2017

01-03-2017 | Original Article

Evaluation of training programme uptake in an attempt to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injuries: the SUPPORT programme

Authors: Nadia Rahman, Latha Vinayakarao, Sangeeta Pathak, Dawn Minden, Louise Melson, Ella Vitue, A Pradhan

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective was to assess the feedback from a quality improvement training programme to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

Methods

Training sessions were organised that included evidence-based information on OASIS risk factors and training on models to measure perineal body length (PBL), perform episiotomies with standard and 60° fixed angle scissors (EPISCISSORS-60®), and measure post-delivery episiotomy suture angles with protractor transparencies. Feedback forms using a Likert scale (1–4) were completed and analysed. The setting was an evidence-based quality improvement programme (Strategy for Using Practical aids for Prevention of OASIS, Recording episiotomies and clinician Training [SUPPORT]) at two National Health Service (NHS) Hospitals in the UK. The participants were midwives and doctors attending the SUPPORT training programme

Results

All of the participants (100 %) would recommend the training programme to a friend or colleague. 92 % felt that the training session improved their knowledge of the impact of PBL and perineal distension and their knowledge of the relationship between episiotomy angle and OASIS “a lot” or “somewhat”.

Conclusion

Based on this feedback, we recommend the addition of the knowledge content of the SUPPORT programme to other centres providing perineal assessment and repair courses.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington: IOM; 2001. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington: IOM; 2001.
2.
go back to reference Ovretveit J. Does improving quality save money? A review of the evidence of which improvements to quality reduce costs to health service providers. London: Health Foundation; 2009. p. 8. Ovretveit J. Does improving quality save money? A review of the evidence of which improvements to quality reduce costs to health service providers. London: Health Foundation; 2009. p. 8.
5.
go back to reference Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears, management (Green-top Guideline No. 29). London: RCOG; 2015. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears, management (Green-top Guideline No. 29). London: RCOG; 2015.
6.
go back to reference Silf K, Woodhead N, Kelly J, Fryer A, Kettle C, Ismail KMK. Evaluation of accuracy of mediolateral episiotomy incisions using a training model. Midwife. 2014;31:197–200.CrossRef Silf K, Woodhead N, Kelly J, Fryer A, Kettle C, Ismail KMK. Evaluation of accuracy of mediolateral episiotomy incisions using a training model. Midwife. 2014;31:197–200.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Aytan H, Tapisiz OL, Tuncay G, Avsar FA. Severe perineal lacerations in nulliparous women and episiotomy type. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;121:46–50.CrossRefPubMed Aytan H, Tapisiz OL, Tuncay G, Avsar FA. Severe perineal lacerations in nulliparous women and episiotomy type. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;121:46–50.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Dua A, Whitworth M, Dugdale A, Hill S. Perineal length: norms in gravid women in the first stage of labour. Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20:1361–4.CrossRef Dua A, Whitworth M, Dugdale A, Hill S. Perineal length: norms in gravid women in the first stage of labour. Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20:1361–4.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Geller EJ. Perineal body length as a risk factor for ultrasound-diagnosed anal sphincter tear at first delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:631–6.CrossRefPubMed Geller EJ. Perineal body length as a risk factor for ultrasound-diagnosed anal sphincter tear at first delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:631–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lai CY, Cheung HW, His Lao TT, Lau TK, Leung TY. Is the policy of restrictive episiotomy generalizable? A prospective observational study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:1116–21.CrossRefPubMed Lai CY, Cheung HW, His Lao TT, Lau TK, Leung TY. Is the policy of restrictive episiotomy generalizable? A prospective observational study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:1116–21.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rizk DEE, Abadir MN, Thomas LB, Abu-Zidan F. Determinants of the length of episiotomy or spontaneous perineal lacerations during vaginal birth. Int Urogynecol J. 2005;16:395–400.CrossRef Rizk DEE, Abadir MN, Thomas LB, Abu-Zidan F. Determinants of the length of episiotomy or spontaneous perineal lacerations during vaginal birth. Int Urogynecol J. 2005;16:395–400.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tsai PS, Oyama IA, Hiraoka M, Minaglia S, Thomas J, Kaneshiro B. Perineal body length among different racial groups in the first stage of labour. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18:165–7.CrossRefPubMed Tsai PS, Oyama IA, Hiraoka M, Minaglia S, Thomas J, Kaneshiro B. Perineal body length among different racial groups in the first stage of labour. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18:165–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Walfisch A, Hallak M, Harley S, Mazor M, Shoham-Vardi I. Association of spontaneous perineal stretching during delivery with perineal lacerations. J Reprod Med. 2005;50:23–8.PubMed Walfisch A, Hallak M, Harley S, Mazor M, Shoham-Vardi I. Association of spontaneous perineal stretching during delivery with perineal lacerations. J Reprod Med. 2005;50:23–8.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Naidu M, Kapoor DS, Evans S, Vinayakarao L, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Cutting an episiotomy at 60 degrees: how good are we? Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:813–6.CrossRefPubMed Naidu M, Kapoor DS, Evans S, Vinayakarao L, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Cutting an episiotomy at 60 degrees: how good are we? Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:813–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference National Institute for Health Care and Excellence. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies; NICE guidelines [CG190]. London: NICE; 2014. National Institute for Health Care and Excellence. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies; NICE guidelines [CG190]. London: NICE; 2014.
17.
go back to reference East CE, Lau R, Biro MA. Midwives’ and doctors’ perceptions of their preparation for and practice in managing the perineum in the second stage of labour: a cross-sectional survey. Midwifery. 2015;31:122–31.CrossRefPubMed East CE, Lau R, Biro MA. Midwives’ and doctors’ perceptions of their preparation for and practice in managing the perineum in the second stage of labour: a cross-sectional survey. Midwifery. 2015;31:122–31.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bick DE, Ismail KM, Macdonald S, Thomas P, Tohill S, Kettle C. How good are we at implementing evidence to support the management of birth related perineal trauma? A UK wide survey of midwifery practice. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bick DE, Ismail KM, Macdonald S, Thomas P, Tohill S, Kettle C. How good are we at implementing evidence to support the management of birth related perineal trauma? A UK wide survey of midwifery practice. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Löwenstein L, Drugan A, Gonen R, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Bardicef M, Jakobi P. Episiotomy: beliefs, practice and the impact of educational intervention. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;123:179–82.CrossRefPubMed Löwenstein L, Drugan A, Gonen R, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Bardicef M, Jakobi P. Episiotomy: beliefs, practice and the impact of educational intervention. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;123:179–82.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of training programme uptake in an attempt to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injuries: the SUPPORT programme
Authors
Nadia Rahman
Latha Vinayakarao
Sangeeta Pathak
Dawn Minden
Louise Melson
Ella Vitue
A Pradhan
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3158-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

International Urogynecology Journal 3/2017 Go to the issue