Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Original Article

Oestrogen-soaked vaginal packing for decubitus ulcer in advanced pelvic organ prolapse: a case series

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Cervicovaginal decubitus ulceration is a well-known complication of advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP). There is no consensus for its management. This case series describes the outcome of using repeated vaginal packs soaked with oestrogen cream to reduce POP and promote decubitus ulcer healing. We aimed to investigate the speed of ulcer healing and endometrial safety with this regimen.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of patients with stage 3 or 4 POP and intact uterus with decubitus ulcer who were planned for surgery that included hysterectomy after ulcer healing. Vaginal packs are replaced at least biweekly—or more frequently if extruded—until ulcer resolution.

Results

Thirteen patients were studied. Mean age was 69 ± 6 years and mean duration of menopause was 19 ± 6 years. Nine patients had a single ulcer and four had multiple ulcers. Mean ulcer diameter was 2.8 ± 1.5 cm and mean duration for ulcer healing was 26 ± 14 days. Hysterectomy and pelvic floor reconstruction was performed a median of 5 (range 0–153) days after ulcer healing was first noted. Histopathological examination of the endometrium following hysterectomy showed three specimens with endocervical hyperplasia; one had concurrent proliferative endometrium, two had simple endometrial hyperplasia and another two had proliferative endometrium.

Conclusion

Oestrogen-soaked vaginal packing is a viable option for managing a decubitus ulcer in advanced POP. We document a measurable impact on the endometrium with this short-term preoperative regimen. Further research is needed to evaluate its efficacy in promoting ulcer healing and endometrial safety.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kovoor EAPH (2008) Assessment and management of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstetrics Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine 18(9):241–246CrossRef Kovoor EAPH (2008) Assessment and management of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstetrics Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine 18(9):241–246CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Manidip Pal SB (2013) Moist vaginal packing for uterovaginal prolapse : a clinical study. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 2(6):619–623CrossRef Manidip Pal SB (2013) Moist vaginal packing for uterovaginal prolapse : a clinical study. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 2(6):619–623CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shrestha B et al (2014) Women’s experiences and health care-seeking practices in relation to uterine prolapse in a hill district of Nepal. BMC Womens Health 14(20):1472–6874 Shrestha B et al (2014) Women’s experiences and health care-seeking practices in relation to uterine prolapse in a hill district of Nepal. BMC Womens Health 14(20):1472–6874
5.
go back to reference Adelowo A, O’Neal E, Hota L (2014) Underlying factors contributing to the delay in patients seeking care for pelvic floor dysfunction. Clin Trials J 4(174), 2167–0870.1000174 Adelowo A, O’Neal E, Hota L (2014) Underlying factors contributing to the delay in patients seeking care for pelvic floor dysfunction. Clin Trials J 4(174), 2167–0870.1000174
6.
go back to reference Campbell C, Parish LC (2010) The decubitus ulcer: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol 28(5):527–532CrossRefPubMed Campbell C, Parish LC (2010) The decubitus ulcer: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol 28(5):527–532CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Luisi M, Franchi F, Kicovic PM (1980) A group-comparative study of effects of ovestin cream versus premarin cream in postmenopausal women with vaginal atrophy. Maturitas 2(4):311–319CrossRefPubMed Luisi M, Franchi F, Kicovic PM (1980) A group-comparative study of effects of ovestin cream versus premarin cream in postmenopausal women with vaginal atrophy. Maturitas 2(4):311–319CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Frick AC et al (2010) Risk of unanticipated abnormal gynecologic pathology at the time of hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(5):077CrossRef Frick AC et al (2010) Risk of unanticipated abnormal gynecologic pathology at the time of hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(5):077CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mansoor A et al (2013) Is hysterectomy required during vaginal reconstructive pelvic surgery? about histopathological results. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 41(2):80–84CrossRefPubMed Mansoor A et al (2013) Is hysterectomy required during vaginal reconstructive pelvic surgery? about histopathological results. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 41(2):80–84CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Suckling J, Lethaby A, Kennedy R (2006) Local oestrogen for vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4, CD001500PubMed Suckling J, Lethaby A, Kennedy R (2006) Local oestrogen for vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4, CD001500PubMed
11.
go back to reference Vaccaro CM et al (2013) Histologic and cytologic effects of vaginal estrogen in women with pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 19(1):34–39CrossRefPubMed Vaccaro CM et al (2013) Histologic and cytologic effects of vaginal estrogen in women with pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 19(1):34–39CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rahn DD et al (2014) Effects of Preoperative Local Estrogen in Postmenopausal Women with Prolapse: a Randomized Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, p. jc20141216 Rahn DD et al (2014) Effects of Preoperative Local Estrogen in Postmenopausal Women with Prolapse: a Randomized Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, p. jc20141216
Metadata
Title
Oestrogen-soaked vaginal packing for decubitus ulcer in advanced pelvic organ prolapse: a case series
Publication date
01-07-2016
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2930-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

International Urogynecology Journal 7/2016 Go to the issue