Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 1/2016

01-01-2016 | Letter to the Editor

Response to the letter to the editor: the correct episiotomy—does it exist?

Authors: Lena Sagi-Dain, Shlomi Sagi

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

The concept of episiotomy was introduced in 1741. This procedure is still sparingly used in many countries, despite the surprising lack of evidence to support its benefits. According to several recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses, no solid evidence has been demonstrated in the professional literature to recommend episiotomy performance even in the most “classic” scenarios, such as prevention and management of shoulder dystocia, vacuum delivery, and prevention of impending tear [13]. Furthermore, this procedure may be related to an increased risk of various obstetric complications, such as postpartum bleeding, pain, and a higher rate of advanced perineal lacerations [3]. Thus, in our opinion, episiotomy should be maximally restricted unless large randomized controlled trials are published supporting its use. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sagi-Dain L, Sagi S (2015) The role of episiotomy in prevention and management of shoulder dystocia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 70(5):354–362PubMedCrossRef Sagi-Dain L, Sagi S (2015) The role of episiotomy in prevention and management of shoulder dystocia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 70(5):354–362PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sagi-Dain L, Sagi S (2015) Morbidity associated with episiotomy in vacuum delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 122(8):1073–1081PubMedCrossRef Sagi-Dain L, Sagi S (2015) Morbidity associated with episiotomy in vacuum delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 122(8):1073–1081PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Carroli G, Mignini L (2009) Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD000081PubMed Carroli G, Mignini L (2009) Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD000081PubMed
4.
go back to reference Cescon C, Riva D, Začesta V et al (2014) Effect of vaginal delivery on the external anal sphincter muscle innervation pattern evaluated by multichannel surface EMG: results of the multicentre study TASI-2. Int Urogynecol J 25(11):1491–1499PubMedCrossRef Cescon C, Riva D, Začesta V et al (2014) Effect of vaginal delivery on the external anal sphincter muscle innervation pattern evaluated by multichannel surface EMG: results of the multicentre study TASI-2. Int Urogynecol J 25(11):1491–1499PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cescon C, Raimondi EE, Začesta V, Drusany-Starič K, Martsidis K, Merletti R (2014) Characterization of the motor units of the external anal sphincter in pregnant women with multichannel surface EMG. Int Urogynecol J 25(8):1097–1103PubMedCrossRef Cescon C, Raimondi EE, Začesta V, Drusany-Starič K, Martsidis K, Merletti R (2014) Characterization of the motor units of the external anal sphincter in pregnant women with multichannel surface EMG. Int Urogynecol J 25(8):1097–1103PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Response to the letter to the editor: the correct episiotomy—does it exist?
Authors
Lena Sagi-Dain
Shlomi Sagi
Publication date
01-01-2016
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2882-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

International Urogynecology Journal 1/2016 Go to the issue