Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 1/2016

01-01-2016 | Original Article

Risk factors for severe obstetric perineal lacerations

Authors: Marilene Vale de Castro Monteiro, Gláucia M. Varella Pereira, Regina Amélia Pessoa Aguiar, Rodrigo Leite Azevedo, Mário Dias Correia-Junior, Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of this study was to assess the occurrence of severe perineal lacerations in vaginal delivery and its relationship with predisposing clinical and obstetric factors.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis using an electronic clinical database at a University Referral Center for high-risk pregnancies was performed. A total of 941 vaginal deliveries were analyzed, over 10 consecutive months in 2013 and 2014. The relationship between obstetric and clinical characteristics and lacerations, especially severe forms, was analyzed. The frequency and severity of birth canal lacerations were compiled and classified as mild (unintentional laceration grades I and II, and mediolateral episiotomy) and severe (grades III and IV). The crude and adjusted odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals were estimated in univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.

Results

The overall incidence of perineal lacerations in vaginal delivery was 78.2 % (n = 731). Lacerations were considered mild in 708 women (75.7 %) and severe in 23 women (2.5 %). Maternal age, parity, use of forceps, mediolateral episiotomy, and birth weight influenced the occurrence of some degree of tear. The chance of severe lacerations increased 1.77-fold per week with the gestational age (1.03–3.03, P = 0.025), while primiparity increased the chance of laceration 5.32-fold. Episiotomy did not show a protective effect against severe laceration occurrence (P = 0.999).

Conclusions

Severe perineal lacerations were associated with operative delivery, primiparity, gestational age, and epidural anesthesia. Episiotomy was not protective.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kettle C, Hills RK, Jones P, Darby L, Gray R, Johanson R (2002) Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359(9325):2217–2223PubMedCrossRef Kettle C, Hills RK, Jones P, Darby L, Gray R, Johanson R (2002) Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359(9325):2217–2223PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Aigmueller T, Umek W, Elenskaia K et al (2013) Guidelines for the management of third and fourth degree perineal tears after vaginal birth from the Austrian Urogynecology Working Group. Int Urogynecol J 24(4):553–558PubMedCrossRef Aigmueller T, Umek W, Elenskaia K et al (2013) Guidelines for the management of third and fourth degree perineal tears after vaginal birth from the Austrian Urogynecology Working Group. Int Urogynecol J 24(4):553–558PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Landy HJ, Laughon SK, Bailit JL et al (2011) Characteristics associated with severe perineal and cervical lacerations during vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 117(3):627–635PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Landy HJ, Laughon SK, Bailit JL et al (2011) Characteristics associated with severe perineal and cervical lacerations during vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 117(3):627–635PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Freeman RM (2013) Can we prevent childbirth‐related pelvic floor dysfunction? BJOG 120(2):137–140PubMedCrossRef Freeman RM (2013) Can we prevent childbirth‐related pelvic floor dysfunction? BJOG 120(2):137–140PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Milsom I, Altman D, Lapitan M, Nelson R, Sillen U, Thom D (2009) Epidemiology of urinary (UI) and faecal (FI) incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Health Publications Ltd., Paris, pp 35–111 Milsom I, Altman D, Lapitan M, Nelson R, Sillen U, Thom D (2009) Epidemiology of urinary (UI) and faecal (FI) incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Health Publications Ltd., Paris, pp 35–111
6.
go back to reference Hunskaar S, Burgio K, Clark A et al (2005) Epidemiology of urinary (UI) and faecal (FI) incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). WHO-ICS International Consultation on Incontinence, 3rd edn. Health Publications Ltd., Paris, pp 255–312 Hunskaar S, Burgio K, Clark A et al (2005) Epidemiology of urinary (UI) and faecal (FI) incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). WHO-ICS International Consultation on Incontinence, 3rd edn. Health Publications Ltd., Paris, pp 255–312
7.
go back to reference Pretlove S, Thompson P, Toozs‐Hobson P, Radley S, Khan K (2008) Does the mode of delivery predispose women to anal incontinence in the first year postpartum? A comparative systematic review. BJOG 115(4):421–434PubMedCrossRef Pretlove S, Thompson P, Toozs‐Hobson P, Radley S, Khan K (2008) Does the mode of delivery predispose women to anal incontinence in the first year postpartum? A comparative systematic review. BJOG 115(4):421–434PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Langer B, Minetti A (2006) Immediate and long term complications of episiotomy. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 35(1 Suppl):1S59–1S67 Langer B, Minetti A (2006) Immediate and long term complications of episiotomy. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 35(1 Suppl):1S59–1S67
9.
go back to reference Murray J, Saxena S, Modi N, Majeed A, Aylin P, Bottle A et al (2013) Quality of routine hospital birth records and the feasibility of their use for creating birth cohorts. J Public Health (Oxf) 35:298–307 Murray J, Saxena S, Modi N, Majeed A, Aylin P, Bottle A et al (2013) Quality of routine hospital birth records and the feasibility of their use for creating birth cohorts. J Public Health (Oxf) 35:298–307
10.
go back to reference Gurol‐Urganci I, Cromwell D, Edozien L et al (2013) Third‐and fourth‐degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG 120(12):1516–1525PubMedCrossRef Gurol‐Urganci I, Cromwell D, Edozien L et al (2013) Third‐and fourth‐degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG 120(12):1516–1525PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pergialiotis V, Vlachos D, Protopapas A, Pappa K, Vlachos G (2014) Risk factors for severe perineal lacerations during childbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 125(1):6–14PubMedCrossRef Pergialiotis V, Vlachos D, Protopapas A, Pappa K, Vlachos G (2014) Risk factors for severe perineal lacerations during childbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 125(1):6–14PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gaspar J, Chagas J, Osanan G, Cruz-Correa R, Reis Z (2013) Maternal and neonatal healthcare information system: development of an obstetric electronic health record and healthcare indicators dashboard. In: Bursa M, Khuri S, Renda ME (eds) Information technology in bio- and medical informatics. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 62–76 Gaspar J, Chagas J, Osanan G, Cruz-Correa R, Reis Z (2013) Maternal and neonatal healthcare information system: development of an obstetric electronic health record and healthcare indicators dashboard. In: Bursa M, Khuri S, Renda ME (eds) Information technology in bio- and medical informatics. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 62–76
13.
go back to reference Reis ZS, Lage EM, Aguiar RA, Gaspar Jde S, Vitral GL, Machado EG (2014) Association between risk pregnancy and route of delivery with maternal and neonatal outcomes. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 36(2):65–71PubMedCrossRef Reis ZS, Lage EM, Aguiar RA, Gaspar Jde S, Vitral GL, Machado EG (2014) Association between risk pregnancy and route of delivery with maternal and neonatal outcomes. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 36(2):65–71PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference World Health Organization (2003) Pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum, and newborn care: a guide for essential practice World Health Organization (2003) Pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum, and newborn care: a guide for essential practice
15.
go back to reference Thacker SB, Banta HD (1983) Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860-1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv 38(6):322–338PubMedCrossRef Thacker SB, Banta HD (1983) Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860-1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv 38(6):322–338PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Carroli G, Mignini L (2009) Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD000081 Carroli G, Mignini L (2009) Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD000081
17.
go back to reference Lede RL, Belizán JM, Carroli G (1996) Is routine use of episiotomy justified? Am J Obstet Gynecol 174(5):1399–1402PubMedCrossRef Lede RL, Belizán JM, Carroli G (1996) Is routine use of episiotomy justified? Am J Obstet Gynecol 174(5):1399–1402PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Jangö H, Langhoff-Roos J, Rosthøj S, Sakse A (2014) Modifiable risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210(1):59.e1–59.e6CrossRef Jangö H, Langhoff-Roos J, Rosthøj S, Sakse A (2014) Modifiable risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210(1):59.e1–59.e6CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Räisänen S, Cartwright R, Gissler M et al (2013) Changing associations of episiotomy and anal sphincter injury across risk strata: results of a population-based register study in Finland 2004–2011. BMJ Open 3(8):e003216 Räisänen S, Cartwright R, Gissler M et al (2013) Changing associations of episiotomy and anal sphincter injury across risk strata: results of a population-based register study in Finland 2004–2011. BMJ Open 3(8):e003216
20.
go back to reference Baghurst PA, Antoniou G (2012) Risk models for benchmarking severe perineal tears during vaginal childbirth: a cross-sectional study of public hospitals in South Australia, 2002-08. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 26(5):430–437PubMedCrossRef Baghurst PA, Antoniou G (2012) Risk models for benchmarking severe perineal tears during vaginal childbirth: a cross-sectional study of public hospitals in South Australia, 2002-08. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 26(5):430–437PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Miller ES, Barber EL, McDonald KD, Gossett DR (2014) Association between obstetrician forceps volume and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 123(2 Pt 1):248–254PubMedCrossRef Miller ES, Barber EL, McDonald KD, Gossett DR (2014) Association between obstetrician forceps volume and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 123(2 Pt 1):248–254PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (2014) Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 123(3):693–711CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (2014) Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 123(3):693–711CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Shaffer BL, Caughey AB (2007) Forceps delivery: potential benefits and a call for continued training. J Perinatol 27(6):327–328PubMedCrossRef Shaffer BL, Caughey AB (2007) Forceps delivery: potential benefits and a call for continued training. J Perinatol 27(6):327–328PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Smith LA, Price N, Simonite V, Burns EE (2013) Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 13:59PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Smith LA, Price N, Simonite V, Burns EE (2013) Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 13:59PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lowder JL, Burrows LJ, Krohn MA, Weber AM (2007) Risk factors for primary and subsequent anal sphincter lacerations: a comparison of cohorts by parity and prior mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(4):344.e1–344.e5CrossRef Lowder JL, Burrows LJ, Krohn MA, Weber AM (2007) Risk factors for primary and subsequent anal sphincter lacerations: a comparison of cohorts by parity and prior mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(4):344.e1–344.e5CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ampt AJ, Ford JB, Roberts CL, Morris JM (2013) Trends in obstetric anal sphincter injuries and associated risk factors for vaginal singleton term births in New South Wales 2001-2009. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 53(1):9–16PubMedCrossRef Ampt AJ, Ford JB, Roberts CL, Morris JM (2013) Trends in obstetric anal sphincter injuries and associated risk factors for vaginal singleton term births in New South Wales 2001-2009. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 53(1):9–16PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ (2014) Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210(3):179–193CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ (2014) Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210(3):179–193CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hirayama F, Koyanagi A, Mori R, Zhang J, Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM (2012) Prevalence and risk factors for third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: a multi-country study. BJOG 119(3):340–347PubMedCrossRef Hirayama F, Koyanagi A, Mori R, Zhang J, Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM (2012) Prevalence and risk factors for third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: a multi-country study. BJOG 119(3):340–347PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Risk factors for severe obstetric perineal lacerations
Authors
Marilene Vale de Castro Monteiro
Gláucia M. Varella Pereira
Regina Amélia Pessoa Aguiar
Rodrigo Leite Azevedo
Mário Dias Correia-Junior
Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis
Publication date
01-01-2016
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2795-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

International Urogynecology Journal 1/2016 Go to the issue