Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 2/2015

01-02-2015 | Original Article

Surface and boney landmarks for sacral neuromodulation: a cadaveric study

Authors: Nicolette E. Deveneau, Miriam Greenstein, Abhijit Mahalingashetty, Nicole R. Herring, Lioudmila Lipetskaia, Ali Azadi, Donald R. Ostergard, Sean L. Francis

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Standard external landmarks have been suggested as a guide for in-office percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE), but validity of these landmarks has not been assessed. Our objective was to determine whether the standard 9 cm from the tip of the coccyx indicates the position of the S3 sacral foramen and whether other boney landmarks and measurements improved positioning.

Methods

Measurements and distances between external boney landmarks were obtained in 22 embalmed cadavers. Spinal needles were placed 9 cm superior to the coccyx and 2 cm lateral to midline bilaterally. After dissection, internal measurements relating to sacral length, position of S3, and location of the needle in relation to S3 were recorded. Correlations among measured variables were assessed using descriptive statistics.

Results

Mean distance from the tip of coccyx to S3 was 9.26 cm (±0.84), from S3 to midline 2.30 cm (±0.2); from needle to S3 1.25 cm, and needle placement was as likely to be placed above or below S3; and S2-S3 and S3-S4 interforamenal distance 1.48 cm (±0.30) and 1.48 cm (±0.24), respectively. Mean distance from S3 to sacroiliac joint (SIJ) was shorter than S2 to SIJ. All associations between external measurements and length from tip of coccyx to S3 were not significant.

Conclusion

A distance 9 cm from the tip of the coccyx is a reasonable starting landmark for in-office blind PNE. However, given the variability in coccyx length, caution should be taken; also, sensory-motor response is necessary to confirm proper placement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Matzel KE, Lux P, Heuer S, Besendörfer M, Zhang W (2009) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 11:636–641PubMedCrossRef Matzel KE, Lux P, Heuer S, Besendörfer M, Zhang W (2009) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 11:636–641PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Schmidt RA, Jonas U, Oleson KA et al (1999) Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of refractory urinary urge incontinence. Sacral Nerve Stimulation Study Group. J Urol 162:352–357PubMedCrossRef Schmidt RA, Jonas U, Oleson KA et al (1999) Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of refractory urinary urge incontinence. Sacral Nerve Stimulation Study Group. J Urol 162:352–357PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hassouna MM, Siegel SW, Nyeholt AA et al (2000) Sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of urgency-frequency symptoms: a multicenter study on efficacy and safety. J Urol 163:1849–1854PubMedCrossRef Hassouna MM, Siegel SW, Nyeholt AA et al (2000) Sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of urgency-frequency symptoms: a multicenter study on efficacy and safety. J Urol 163:1849–1854PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jonas U, Fowler CJ, Chancellor MB et al (2001) Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for urinary retention: results 18 months after implantation. J Urol 165:15–19PubMedCrossRef Jonas U, Fowler CJ, Chancellor MB et al (2001) Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for urinary retention: results 18 months after implantation. J Urol 165:15–19PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shaker HS, Hassouna MM (1998) Sacral root neuromodulation in idiopathic nonobstructive chronic urinary retention. J Urol 159:1476–1478PubMedCrossRef Shaker HS, Hassouna MM (1998) Sacral root neuromodulation in idiopathic nonobstructive chronic urinary retention. J Urol 159:1476–1478PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Shaker HS, Hassouna MM (1999) Sacral root neuromodulation in the treatment of various voiding and storage problems. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10:336–343PubMedCrossRef Shaker HS, Hassouna MM (1999) Sacral root neuromodulation in the treatment of various voiding and storage problems. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10:336–343PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Amend B, Khalil M, Kessler TM, Sievert K-D (2011) How does sacral modulation work best? Placement and programming techniques to maximize efficacy. Curr Urol Rep 12:327–335PubMedCrossRef Amend B, Khalil M, Kessler TM, Sievert K-D (2011) How does sacral modulation work best? Placement and programming techniques to maximize efficacy. Curr Urol Rep 12:327–335PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chai TC, Mamo GJ (2001) Modified techniques of S3 foramen localization and lead implantation in S3 neuromodulation. Urology 58:786–790PubMedCrossRef Chai TC, Mamo GJ (2001) Modified techniques of S3 foramen localization and lead implantation in S3 neuromodulation. Urology 58:786–790PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Spinelli M, Giardiello G, Gerber M et al (2003) New sacral neuromodulation lead for percutaneous implantation using local anesthesia: description and first experience. J Urol 170:1905–1907PubMedCrossRef Spinelli M, Giardiello G, Gerber M et al (2003) New sacral neuromodulation lead for percutaneous implantation using local anesthesia: description and first experience. J Urol 170:1905–1907PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Williams ER, Siegel SW (2010) Procedural techniques in sacral nerve modulation. Int Urogynecol J 21:S453–S460PubMedCrossRef Williams ER, Siegel SW (2010) Procedural techniques in sacral nerve modulation. Int Urogynecol J 21:S453–S460PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Spinelli M, Sievert K-D (2008) Latest technologic and surgical developments in using InterStim TM therapy for sacral neuromodulation: impact on treatment success and safety. Eur Urol 54:1287–1296PubMedCrossRef Spinelli M, Sievert K-D (2008) Latest technologic and surgical developments in using InterStim TM therapy for sacral neuromodulation: impact on treatment success and safety. Eur Urol 54:1287–1296PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Buchs NC, Dembe JC, Robert-Yap J, Roche B, Fasel J (2008) Optimizing electrode implantation in sacral nerve stimulation - an anatomical cadaver study controlled by a laparoscopic camera. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:85–91PubMedCrossRef Buchs NC, Dembe JC, Robert-Yap J, Roche B, Fasel J (2008) Optimizing electrode implantation in sacral nerve stimulation - an anatomical cadaver study controlled by a laparoscopic camera. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:85–91PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hasan ST, Shanahan DA, Pridie AK, Neal DE (1996) Surface localization of sacral foramina for neuromodulation of bladder function. An anatomical study. Eur Urol 29:90–98PubMed Hasan ST, Shanahan DA, Pridie AK, Neal DE (1996) Surface localization of sacral foramina for neuromodulation of bladder function. An anatomical study. Eur Urol 29:90–98PubMed
14.
go back to reference McCullough MC, Decker S, Ford J et al (2013) Third Sacral Foramina Morphometry for Sacral Neuromodulation. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 19:23–30PubMedCrossRef McCullough MC, Decker S, Ford J et al (2013) Third Sacral Foramina Morphometry for Sacral Neuromodulation. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 19:23–30PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Saint Clair N, Boyles SH, Clark A et al (2008) The presacral space and its impact on sacral neuromodulator implantation. J Urol 180:988–991PubMedCrossRef Saint Clair N, Boyles SH, Clark A et al (2008) The presacral space and its impact on sacral neuromodulator implantation. J Urol 180:988–991PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference O’Haire C, Gibbons P (2000) Inter-examiner and intra-examiner agreement for assessing sacroiliac anatomical landmarks using palpation and observation: pilot study. Man Ther 5:13–20PubMedCrossRef O’Haire C, Gibbons P (2000) Inter-examiner and intra-examiner agreement for assessing sacroiliac anatomical landmarks using palpation and observation: pilot study. Man Ther 5:13–20PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Surface and boney landmarks for sacral neuromodulation: a cadaveric study
Authors
Nicolette E. Deveneau
Miriam Greenstein
Abhijit Mahalingashetty
Nicole R. Herring
Lioudmila Lipetskaia
Ali Azadi
Donald R. Ostergard
Sean L. Francis
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2504-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

International Urogynecology Journal 2/2015 Go to the issue