Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Urogynecology Journal
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 2/2015

01-02-2015 | Original Article

Trigonometric characteristics of episiotomy and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in operative vaginal delivery

Authors: E. Gonzalez-Díaz, L. Moreno Cea, A. Fernández Corona

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective of this study was to investigate the association between the trigonometric properties of episiotomy in operative vaginal delivery (OVD) and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

Methods

The study included 72 primiparous women who had an OVD and episiotomy. Cases (n = 36) had sustained OASIS at birth, while controls (n = 36) had not. The groups were matched for instrumental delivery. The episiotomy scar was identified and its trigonometric characteristics were measured at 8–12 weeks postpartum. Data were analysed using conditional logistic analysis.

Results

The angle of episiotomy behaves as a factor associated with anal sphincter injury, so women with a mediolateral episiotomy and an angle greater than 20° have an 87 % less risk of having an OASIS (odds ratio 0.13, 95 % confidence interval 0.03–0.58). The study showed that scarred episiotomies at 8–12 weeks after OVD with an angle ≤ 20°, depth and distance between the episiotomy and anus ≤ 15 mm, total upper triangle perimeter ≤ 75 mm, para-anal triangle perimeter ≤ 15 mm and areas between scar and midline ≤ 250 mm2 were significantly associated with higher risk of OASIS.

Conclusions

When a mediolateral episiotomy is performed in OVD the technique has a strong effect on the occurrence of OASIS. Additional research is needed to determine if the optimal technique for mediolateral episiotomies produces less OASIS than deferring the performance of episiotomy.
Literature
1.
Weber A (2004) The perspective of a gynecologist on treatment-related research for fecal incontinence in women. Gastroenterology 126:S169–S171PubMedCrossRef
2.
de Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, Wallenburg HC (2001) Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG 108:383–387PubMed
3.
Christianson LM, Bovbjerg VE, McDavitt EC, Hullfish KL (2003) Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:255–260PubMedCrossRef
4.
Dandolu V, Chatwani A, Harmanli O, Floro C, Gaughan JP, Hernandez E (2005) Risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:304–307PubMedCrossRef
5.
Robinson JN, Norwitz ER, Cohen AP, McElrath TF, Lieberman ES (1999) Episiotomy, operative vaginal delivery, and significant perinatal trauma in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181(5 Pt 1):1180–1184PubMedCrossRef
6.
Kudish B, Blackwell S, Mcneeley SG et al (2006) Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(3):749–754PubMedCrossRef
7.
Youssef R, Ramalingam U, Macleod M, Murphy DJ (2005) Cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at instrumental vaginal delivery. BJOG 112(7):941–945PubMedCrossRef
8.
Hudelist G, Gelle’n J, Singer C et al (2005) Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(3):875–881PubMedCrossRef
9.
Tayrac R, Panel L, Masson G, Mares P (2006) Episiotomy and prevention of perineal and pelvic floor injuries. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 35(1 Suppl):1S24–1S31
10.
de Vogel J, van der Leeuw-van Beek A, Gietelink D et al (2012) The effect of a mediolateral episiotomy during operative vaginal delivery on the risk of developing obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206:404.e1–404.e5CrossRef
11.
Räisänen S, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Cartwright R, Gissler M, Heinonen S (2012) Vacuum-assisted deliveries and the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries—a retrospective register-based study in Finland. BJOG 119:1370–1378PubMedCrossRef
12.
Combs CA, Robertson PA, Laros RK Jr (1990) Risk factors for third-degree and fourth-degree perineal lacerations in forceps and vacuum deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163(1 Pt 1):100–104PubMedCrossRef
13.
de Leeuw JW, de Wit C, Kuijken JP, Bruinse HW (2008) Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery. BJOG 115(1):104–108PubMedCrossRef
14.
Murphy D, Macleod M, Bahl R, Goyder K, Howarth L, Strachan B (2008) A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study. BJOG 115:1695–1703PubMedCrossRef
15.
Macleod M, Goyder K, Howarth L, Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy D (2013) Morbidity experienced by women before and after operative vaginal delivery: prospective cohort study nested within a two-centre randomised controlled trial of restrictive versus routine use of episiotomy. BJOG 120:1020–1027PubMedCrossRef
16.
Kalis V, Stepan J Jr, Horak M, Roztocil A, Kralickova M, Rokyta Z (2008) Definitions of mediolateral episiotomy in Europe. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 100:188–189PubMedCrossRef
17.
Tincello DG, Williams A, Fowler GE, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, Alfirevic Z (2003) Differences in episiotomy technique between midwives and doctors. BJOG 110:1041–1044PubMedCrossRef
18.
Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Jones PW (2005) Are mediolateral episiotomies actually mediolateral? BJOG 112:1156–1158PubMedCrossRef
19.
van Dillen J, Spaans M, van Keijsteren W et al (2010) A prospective multicenter audit of labor-room episiotomy and anal sphincter injury assessment in the Netherlands. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 108:97–100PubMedCrossRef
20.
Hartmann K, Viswanathan M, Palmieri R, Gartlehner G, Thorp J Jr, Lohr KN (2005) Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review. JAMA 293:2141–2148PubMedCrossRef
21.
Eogan M, Daly L, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C (2006) Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury? BJOG 113:190–194PubMedCrossRef
22.
Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW (2006) Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study. Birth 33:117–122PubMedCrossRef
23.
Kalis V, Landsmanova J, Bednarova B, Karbanova J, Laine K, Rokyta Z (2011) Evaluation of the incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy at 60 degrees. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 112:220–224PubMedCrossRef
24.
Stedenfeldt M, Pirhonen J, Blix E, Wilsgaard T, Vonen B, Øian P (2012) Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case–control study. BJOG 119:724–730PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
25.
26.
27.
Geller EJ, Robinson BL, Matthews CA et al (2014) Perineal body length as a risk for ultrasound-diagnosed anal sphincter tear at first delivery. Int Urogynecol J 25:631–636PubMedCrossRef
28.
Kalis V, Chaloupka P, Turek J, Rokyta Z (2005) The perineal body length and injury at delivery. Ceska Gynekol 70(5):355–361PubMed
29.
Kalis V, Karbanova J, Horak M, Lobovsky L, Kralickova M, Rokyta Z (2008) The incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy before delivery and after repair. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 103:5–8PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Trigonometric characteristics of episiotomy and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in operative vaginal delivery
Authors
E. Gonzalez-Díaz
L. Moreno Cea
A. Fernández Corona
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2491-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

International Urogynecology Journal 2/2015 Go to the issue

Original Article

Effect of myogenic stem cells on the integrity and histomorphology of repaired transected external anal sphincter

IUJ Video

Introduction to a new technology for measuring urethral pressures: 3D high-resolution manometry

Review Article

Should prophylactic anti-incontinence procedures be performed at the time of prolapse repair? Systematic review

Original Article

Short-term effect of adding pelvic floor muscle training to bladder training for female urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial

Erratum

Erratum to: Architectural design of the pelvic floor is consistent with muscle functional subspecialization

Original Article

The introduction of mid-urethral slings: an evaluation of literature