Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2014

01-06-2014 | Editorial

Patents running out: time to take stock of robotic surgery

Author: Barry A O’Reilly

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Excerpt

Throughout history there have been descriptions of machines designed to function automatically, with one of the earliest descriptions of a self-operating machine or automaton appearing in the Liezi text in the third century B.C. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Litynski GS (1998) Erich Mühe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time. JSLS 2(4):341–346PubMedCentralPubMed Litynski GS (1998) Erich Mühe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time. JSLS 2(4):341–346PubMedCentralPubMed
2.
go back to reference Peters JH, Fried GM, Swanstrom LL, Soper NJ, Silin LF, Schirmer B, Hoffman K, SAGES FLS Committee (2004) Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 135(1):21–27PubMedCrossRef Peters JH, Fried GM, Swanstrom LL, Soper NJ, Silin LF, Schirmer B, Hoffman K, SAGES FLS Committee (2004) Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 135(1):21–27PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Smith R, Patel V, Satava R (2013) Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14-society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development. Int J Med Robot. Nov 26 [epub ahead of print] Smith R, Patel V, Satava R (2013) Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14-society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development. Int J Med Robot. Nov 26 [epub ahead of print]
4.
go back to reference Collins S, Tulikangas P (2010) Randomized trials in robotic surgery: a practical impossibility? Int Urogynecol J 21(9):1045–1047PubMedCrossRef Collins S, Tulikangas P (2010) Randomized trials in robotic surgery: a practical impossibility? Int Urogynecol J 21(9):1045–1047PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Buxton MJ (1987) Problems in the economic appraisal of new health technology: the evaluation of heart transplants in the UK. In: Drummond MF. Economic appraisal of health technology in the European Community. Oxford Medical Publications 103–18 Buxton MJ (1987) Problems in the economic appraisal of new health technology: the evaluation of heart transplants in the UK. In: Drummond MF. Economic appraisal of health technology in the European Community. Oxford Medical Publications 103–18
6.
go back to reference Ergina PL, Barkun JS, McCulloch P, Cook JA, Altman DG (2013) BMJ IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 2: observational studies in the exploration and assessment stages. BMJ 346:f3011PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ergina PL, Barkun JS, McCulloch P, Cook JA, Altman DG (2013) BMJ IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 2: observational studies in the exploration and assessment stages. BMJ 346:f3011PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gehart J (2013) Ray Lee, 1931–2012:surgeon, teacher, mentor, friend. Int Urogynecol J 24(8):1257CrossRef Gehart J (2013) Ray Lee, 1931–2012:surgeon, teacher, mentor, friend. Int Urogynecol J 24(8):1257CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patents running out: time to take stock of robotic surgery
Author
Barry A O’Reilly
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2353-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2014 Go to the issue