Top

International Urogynecology Journal

Published in:

01-03-2014 | Letter to the Editor

A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Reply to comment

Authors: R. M. Freeman, K. Pantazis, A. Thomson, J. Frappell, L. Bombieri, P. Moran, M. Slack, P. Scott, M. Waterfield

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 3/2014

Excerpt

Dear Editor, …

Freeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A et al (2013) A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J 24:377–384. doi:10.1007/s00192-012-1885-x PubMedCrossRef

Long C-Y, Lin K-L, Wang C-L (2013) A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Comment. Int Urogynecol J. doi:10.1007/s00192-013-2306-5

Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17PubMedCrossRef

Toozs-Hobson P, Freeman R, Barber M, Maher C, Haylen B, Athanasiou S, Swift S, Whitmore K, Ghoniem G, de Ridder D (2012) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23(5):527–535PubMedCrossRef

Oyama IA, Steinberg AC, Watai TK, Minaglia SM (2012) Pelvic organ prolapse quantification use in the literature. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18(1):35–36PubMedCrossRef

Swift S, Morris S, McKinnie V, Freeman R, Petri E, Scotti RJ, Dwyer P (2006) Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(6):615–620PubMedCrossRef

Auwad W, Freeman RM, Swift S (2004) Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15(5):324–327PubMed

Pham T, Burgart A, Kenton K, Mueller ER, Brubaker L (2011) Current use of pelvic organ prolapse quantification by AUGS and ICS members. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 17(2):67–69PubMedCrossRef

Title: A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Reply to comment
Authors: R. M. Freeman
K. Pantazis
A. Thomson
J. Frappell
L. Bombieri
P. Moran
M. Slack
P. Scott
M. Waterfield
Publication date: 01-03-2014
Publisher: Springer London
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2305-6

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Reply to comment

Excerpt

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Excerpt

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Postpartum translabial 2D and 3D ultrasound measurements of the anal sphincter complex in primiparous women delivering by vaginal birth versus Cesarean delivery

Climbing a long hill: pelvic floor surgery and the need for geriatric urogynecology

A cohort study comparing a single-incision sling with a retropubic midurethral sling

A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Comment

Are patients’ personal goals achieved after pelvic reconstructive surgery?

Impact of levator trauma on pelvic floor muscle function