Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2014

01-06-2014 | Original Article

Effect of fesoterodine on urethral closure function in women with stress urinary incontinence assessed by urethral pressure reflectometry

Authors: Niels Klarskov, Amanda Darekar, David Scholfield, Laurence Whelan, Gunnar Lose

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim was to evaluate, using urethral pressure reflectometry (UPR), the effect of fesoterodine on urethral function in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Methods

Women aged 18 to 65 years were eligible for this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study if they had had clinically significant SUI or SUI-predominant mixed urinary incontinence for >3 months. Each participant received fesoterodine 4 mg, fesoterodine 8 mg, and placebo once daily for 7 days, with a 7- to 10-day washout between treatments. UPR was performed at baseline and 4 to 8 h after the last dose in each treatment period. Participants completed a 3-day bladder diary before randomisation and during the last 3 days of each treatment period.

Results

Of the 22 women randomly assigned and treated, 17 met the criteria for the primary efficacy analyses. No statistically significant differences were seen between fesoterodine 4 mg or fesoterodine 8 mg and placebo in opening urethral pressure (primary endpoint) or other UPR endpoints. No statistically significant differences were seen between either fesoterodine dose and placebo in the change from baseline in the bladder diary variables (total urinary incontinence, SUI, or urgency urinary incontinence episodes per 24 h). Adverse events were reported by 8 participants taking fesoterodine 4 mg, 17 taking fesoterodine 8 mg, and 8 taking placebo.

Conclusions

Fesoterodine did not affect urethral pressure or significantly decrease the number of incontinence episodes in women with SUI. The UPR parameters showed no placebo effect, while there was a placebo effect of 60 % based on the bladder diary.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hunskaar S, Lose G, Sykes D, Voss S (2004) The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries. BJU Int 93(3):324–330PubMedCrossRef Hunskaar S, Lose G, Sykes D, Voss S (2004) The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries. BJU Int 93(3):324–330PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wang A, Carr LK (2008) Female stress urinary incontinence. Can J Urol 15 [Suppl 1]:37–43, discussionPubMed Wang A, Carr LK (2008) Female stress urinary incontinence. Can J Urol 15 [Suppl 1]:37–43, discussionPubMed
6.
go back to reference Weir M, Brien J (2000) Adolescent urinary tract infections. Adolesc Med 11(2):293–313PubMed Weir M, Brien J (2000) Adolescent urinary tract infections. Adolesc Med 11(2):293–313PubMed
7.
go back to reference Klarskov N, Lose G (2007) Urethral pressure reflectometry; a novel technique for simultaneous recording of pressure and cross-sectional area in the female urethra. Neurourol Urodyn 26(2):254–261PubMedCrossRef Klarskov N, Lose G (2007) Urethral pressure reflectometry; a novel technique for simultaneous recording of pressure and cross-sectional area in the female urethra. Neurourol Urodyn 26(2):254–261PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Klarskov N, Lose G (2007) Urethral pressure reflectometry vs urethral pressure profilometry in women: a comparative study of reproducibility and accuracy. BJU Int 100(2):351–356PubMedCrossRef Klarskov N, Lose G (2007) Urethral pressure reflectometry vs urethral pressure profilometry in women: a comparative study of reproducibility and accuracy. BJU Int 100(2):351–356PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Klarskov N, Scholfield D, Soma K, Darekar A, Mills I, Lose G (2009) Measurement of urethral closure function in women with stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 181(6):2628–2633, discussion 33PubMedCrossRef Klarskov N, Scholfield D, Soma K, Darekar A, Mills I, Lose G (2009) Measurement of urethral closure function in women with stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 181(6):2628–2633, discussion 33PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Anderson KE (2011) Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the urinary tract. In: Anderson KE, Michel MC (eds) Urinary tract, handbook of experimental pharmacology. Springer, Berlin, pp 327–328CrossRef Anderson KE (2011) Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the urinary tract. In: Anderson KE, Michel MC (eds) Urinary tract, handbook of experimental pharmacology. Springer, Berlin, pp 327–328CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21(2):167–178PubMedCrossRef Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21(2):167–178PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Abrams P, Andersson KE (2007) Muscarinic receptor antagonists for overactive bladder. BJU Int 100(5):987–1006PubMedCrossRef Abrams P, Andersson KE (2007) Muscarinic receptor antagonists for overactive bladder. BJU Int 100(5):987–1006PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wein AJ (2001) Pharmacological agents for the treatment of urinary incontinence due to overactive bladder. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 10(1):65–83PubMedCrossRef Wein AJ (2001) Pharmacological agents for the treatment of urinary incontinence due to overactive bladder. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 10(1):65–83PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Andersson KE, Pehrson R (2003) CNS involvement in overactive bladder: pathophysiology and opportunities for pharmacological intervention. Drugs 63(23):2595–2611PubMedCrossRef Andersson KE, Pehrson R (2003) CNS involvement in overactive bladder: pathophysiology and opportunities for pharmacological intervention. Drugs 63(23):2595–2611PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nitti VW, Dmochowski R, Sand PK, Forst HT, Haag-Molkenteller C, Massow U et al (2007) Efficacy, safety and tolerability of fesoterodine for overactive bladder syndrome. J Urol 178(6):2488–2494PubMedCrossRef Nitti VW, Dmochowski R, Sand PK, Forst HT, Haag-Molkenteller C, Massow U et al (2007) Efficacy, safety and tolerability of fesoterodine for overactive bladder syndrome. J Urol 178(6):2488–2494PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chapple C, Van Kerrebroeck P, Tubaro A, Haag-Molkenteller C, Forst HT, Massow U et al (2007) Clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-daily fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder. Eur Urol 52(4):1204–1212PubMedCrossRef Chapple C, Van Kerrebroeck P, Tubaro A, Haag-Molkenteller C, Forst HT, Massow U et al (2007) Clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-daily fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder. Eur Urol 52(4):1204–1212PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of fesoterodine on urethral closure function in women with stress urinary incontinence assessed by urethral pressure reflectometry
Authors
Niels Klarskov
Amanda Darekar
David Scholfield
Laurence Whelan
Gunnar Lose
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2269-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2014 Go to the issue