Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 11/2013

01-11-2013 | Original Article

Introduction of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy to a fellowship training program

Authors: Kelly Kantartzis, Gary Sutkin, Dan Winger, Li Wang, Jonathan Shepherd

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 11/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Minimally invasive sacral colpopexy has increased over the past decade, with many senior physicians adopting this new skill set. However, skill acquisition at an academic institution in the presence of postgraduate learners is not well described. This manuscript outlines the introduction of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy to an academic urogynecology service that was not performing minimally invasive sacral colpopexies, and it also defines a surgical learning curve.

Methods

The first 180 laparoscopic sacral colpopexies done by four attending urogynecologists from January 2009 to December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was operative time. Secondary outcomes included conversion to laparotomy, estimated blood loss, and intra- and postoperative complications. Linear regression was used to analyze trends in operative times. Fisher’s exact test compared surgical complications and counts of categorical variables.

Results

Mean total operative time was 250 ± 52 min (range 146–452) with hysterectomy and 222 ± 45 (range 146–353) for sacral colpopexy alone. When compared with the first ten cases performed by each surgeon, operative times in subsequent groups decreased significantly, with a 6–16.3 % reduction in overall times. There was no significant difference in the rate of overall complications regardless of the number of prior procedures performed (p = 0.262).

Conclusions

Introduction of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy in a training program is safe and efficient. Reduction in operative time is similar to published learning curves in teaching and nonteaching settings. Introducing this technique does not add additional surgical risk as these skills are acquired.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wu JM, Kawasaki A, Hundley AF, Dieter AA, Myers ER, Sung VW (2011) Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205(3):230 e231–235. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.046 Wu JM, Kawasaki A, Hundley AF, Dieter AA, Myers ER, Sung VW (2011) Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205(3):230 e231–235. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ajog.​2011.​03.​046
5.
go back to reference Claerhout F, Roovers JP, Lewi P, Verguts J, De Ridder D, Deprest J (2009) Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy—a single centre’s experience. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(9):1119–1125. doi:10.1007/s00192-009-0914-x PubMedCrossRef Claerhout F, Roovers JP, Lewi P, Verguts J, De Ridder D, Deprest J (2009) Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy—a single centre’s experience. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(9):1119–1125. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-009-0914-x PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Klauschie JL, Suozzi BA, O’Brien MM, McBride AW (2009) A comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective outcome and perioperative differences. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(3):273–279. doi:10.1007/s00192-008-0768-7 PubMedCrossRef Klauschie JL, Suozzi BA, O’Brien MM, McBride AW (2009) A comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective outcome and perioperative differences. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(3):273–279. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-008-0768-7 PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Maher CF, Feiner B, DeCuyper EM, Nichlos CJ, Hickey KV, O’Rourke P (2011) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(4):360 e361–367. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.016 Maher CF, Feiner B, DeCuyper EM, Nichlos CJ, Hickey KV, O’Rourke P (2011) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(4):360 e361–367. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ajog.​2010.​11.​016
13.
go back to reference Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10–17PubMedCrossRef Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10–17PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mustafa S, Amit A, Filmar S, Deutsch M, Netzer I, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Lowenstein L (2012) Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: establishment of a learning curve and short-term outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet. doi:10.1007/s00404-012-2391-6 Mustafa S, Amit A, Filmar S, Deutsch M, Netzer I, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Lowenstein L (2012) Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: establishment of a learning curve and short-term outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet. doi:10.​1007/​s00404-012-2391-6
Metadata
Title
Introduction of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy to a fellowship training program
Authors
Kelly Kantartzis
Gary Sutkin
Dan Winger
Li Wang
Jonathan Shepherd
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2085-z

Other articles of this Issue 11/2013

International Urogynecology Journal 11/2013 Go to the issue

POP Surgery Review

Apical prolapse

Urogynecology Digest

Urogynecology digest