Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 4/2013

01-04-2013 | Original Article

A new rectovaginal fascial plication technique for treatment of rectocele with obstructed defecation: a proof of concept study

Authors: Karin Schmidlin-Enderli, Bernhard Schuessler

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of this study was to investigate the functional and anatomical outcome after a new rectovaginal fascial plication technique in patients with rectoceles or rectal pockets and obstructed defecation.

Methods

In a prospective study 54 of 87 patients were examined pre- and postoperatively using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system of the International Continence Society (ICS). Bowel and protrusion symptoms as well as quality of life (QOL) were evaluated by a standardized questionnaire. Surgical therapy consisted of a posterior vaginal wall incision in the midline, a dissection of the vaginal epithelium from the underlying rectovaginal fascia while the rectocele was brought under tension by the index finger in the rectum. Under rectal digital control the surgically exposed rectovaginal fascia was sutured in a cranio-caudal fashion with sagittally positioned running absorbable sutures followed by a careful reapproximation of the laterally separated perineal body in the midline.

Results

Obstructed defecation symptoms were cured or improved in 72.2 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 59.1–82.4]. Anatomical cure rate was 92.1 % (95 % CI 79.2–97.3) and protrusion symptoms were resolved in 73.6 % (95 % CI 58.0–85.0). Of the patients who had intercourse, 5.2 % reported de novo dyspareunia postoperatively; in none of these patients was an anatomical cause found. There were no major intra- or postoperative complications.

Conclusions

Sagittal rectovaginal fascial plication in symptomatic rectoceles or functionally relevant rectal pockets is associated with a satisfactory anatomical and functional cure rate without impacting sexual function.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zbar AP, Lienemann A, Fritsch H, Beer-Gabel M, Pescatori M (2003) Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:369–384PubMedCrossRef Zbar AP, Lienemann A, Fritsch H, Beer-Gabel M, Pescatori M (2003) Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:369–384PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference DeLancey JO (1999) Structural anatomy of the posterior pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:815–823PubMedCrossRef DeLancey JO (1999) Structural anatomy of the posterior pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:815–823PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Richardson AC (1995) The anatomic defects in rectocele and enterocele. J Pelvic Surg 1:214–221 Richardson AC (1995) The anatomic defects in rectocele and enterocele. J Pelvic Surg 1:214–221
5.
go back to reference Richardson AC (1993) The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol 36:976–983PubMedCrossRef Richardson AC (1993) The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol 36:976–983PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Burrows LJ, Meyn LA, Walters MD, Weber AM (2004) Pelvic symptoms im women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 104:982–988PubMedCrossRef Burrows LJ, Meyn LA, Walters MD, Weber AM (2004) Pelvic symptoms im women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 104:982–988PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR (2000) Sexual function and vaginal anatomy in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1610–1615PubMedCrossRef Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR (2000) Sexual function and vaginal anatomy in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1610–1615PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L (1999) The anatomic and functional variability of rectoceles in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10:96–99PubMedCrossRef Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L (1999) The anatomic and functional variability of rectoceles in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10:96–99PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nichols DH, Randall CL (1996) Posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy. In: Nichols DH, Randall CL (eds) Vaginal surgery, 4th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 257–289 Nichols DH, Randall CL (1996) Posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy. In: Nichols DH, Randall CL (eds) Vaginal surgery, 4th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 257–289
10.
go back to reference Kahn MA, Stanton SL (1997) Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:82–86PubMedCrossRef Kahn MA, Stanton SL (1997) Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:82–86PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Silva WA, Karram MM (2001) Rectocele–anatomic and functional repair. In: Cardozo L, Staskin DR (eds) Textbook of female urology and urogynecology. Isis Medical Media, London, pp 1035–1051 Silva WA, Karram MM (2001) Rectocele–anatomic and functional repair. In: Cardozo L, Staskin DR (eds) Textbook of female urology and urogynecology. Isis Medical Media, London, pp 1035–1051
12.
go back to reference Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, Winkler HA, Tomezsko J, Culligan PJ, Goldberg R (2001) Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1357–1364PubMedCrossRef Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, Winkler HA, Tomezsko J, Culligan PJ, Goldberg R (2001) Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1357–1364PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Addison WA, Bump RC (1998) An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1451–1457PubMedCrossRef Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Addison WA, Bump RC (1998) An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1451–1457PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Abramov Y, Gandhi S, Goldberg RP, Botros SM, Kwon C, Sand P (2005) Site-specific rectocele repair compared with standard posterior colporrhaphy. Obstet Gynecol 105:314–318PubMedCrossRef Abramov Y, Gandhi S, Goldberg RP, Botros SM, Kwon C, Sand P (2005) Site-specific rectocele repair compared with standard posterior colporrhaphy. Obstet Gynecol 105:314–318PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Milani AL, Withagen MI, Schweitzer KJ, Janszen EW, Vierhout ME (2010) Midline fascial plication under continuous digital transrectal control: which factors determine anatomic outcome? Int Urogynecol J 21:623–630PubMedCrossRef Milani AL, Withagen MI, Schweitzer KJ, Janszen EW, Vierhout ME (2010) Midline fascial plication under continuous digital transrectal control: which factors determine anatomic outcome? Int Urogynecol J 21:623–630PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Maher C, Baessler K (2005) Surgical management of posterior vaginal prolapse: an evidence-based literature review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:84–88PubMed Maher C, Baessler K (2005) Surgical management of posterior vaginal prolapse: an evidence-based literature review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:84–88PubMed
17.
go back to reference Goh JTW, Dwyer PL (2001) Effectiveness and safety of polypropylene mesh in vaginal prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12:90 Goh JTW, Dwyer PL (2001) Effectiveness and safety of polypropylene mesh in vaginal prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12:90
19.
go back to reference Karlbom U, Graf W, Nilsson S, Påhlman L (1996) Does surgical repair of a rectocele improve rectal emptying? Dis Colon Rectum 39:1296–1302PubMedCrossRef Karlbom U, Graf W, Nilsson S, Påhlman L (1996) Does surgical repair of a rectocele improve rectal emptying? Dis Colon Rectum 39:1296–1302PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Khubchandani IT, Clancy JP, Rosen L, Riether RD, Stasik JJ (1997) Endorectal repair of rectocele revisited. Br J Surg 84:89–91PubMedCrossRef Khubchandani IT, Clancy JP, Rosen L, Riether RD, Stasik JJ (1997) Endorectal repair of rectocele revisited. Br J Surg 84:89–91PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17PubMedCrossRef Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GC, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1467–1470PubMedCrossRef Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GC, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1467–1470PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference van Dam JH, Hop WC, Schouten WR (2000) Analysis of patients with poor outcome of rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1556–1560PubMedCrossRef van Dam JH, Hop WC, Schouten WR (2000) Analysis of patients with poor outcome of rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1556–1560PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Singh K, Reid WM, Berger LA (2001) Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:71–77PubMedCrossRef Singh K, Reid WM, Berger LA (2001) Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:71–77PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lim M, Lew-Gor S, Darby Y, Brookes N, Scadding G, Lund VJ (2007) The relationship between subjective assessment instruments in chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 45:144–147PubMed Lim M, Lew-Gor S, Darby Y, Brookes N, Scadding G, Lund VJ (2007) The relationship between subjective assessment instruments in chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 45:144–147PubMed
26.
go back to reference Porter WE, Steele A, Walsh P, Kohli N, Karram MM (1999) The anatomic and functional outcomes of defect-specific rectocele repairs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1353–1359PubMedCrossRef Porter WE, Steele A, Walsh P, Kohli N, Karram MM (1999) The anatomic and functional outcomes of defect-specific rectocele repairs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1353–1359PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Singh K, Cortes E, Reid WM (2003) Evaluation of the fascial technique for surgical repair of isolated posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 101:320–324PubMedCrossRef Singh K, Cortes E, Reid WM (2003) Evaluation of the fascial technique for surgical repair of isolated posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 101:320–324PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Glavind K, Madsen H (2000) A prospective study of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79:145–147PubMedCrossRef Glavind K, Madsen H (2000) A prospective study of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79:145–147PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L (1999) Outcome after rectovaginal fascia reattachment for rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1360–1364PubMedCrossRef Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L (1999) Outcome after rectovaginal fascia reattachment for rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1360–1364PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Paraiso MF, Barber MD, Muir TW, Walters MD (2006) Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1762–1771PubMedCrossRef Paraiso MF, Barber MD, Muir TW, Walters MD (2006) Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1762–1771PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Mellgren A, Anzén B, Nilsson BY, Johansson C, Dolk A, Gillgren P, Bremmer S, Holmström B (1995) Results of rectocele repair. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 38:7–13PubMedCrossRef Mellgren A, Anzén B, Nilsson BY, Johansson C, Dolk A, Gillgren P, Bremmer S, Holmström B (1995) Results of rectocele repair. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 38:7–13PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Baessler K, Schluter PJ (2004) Midline rectovaginal fascial plication for repair of rectocele and obstructed defecation. Obstet Gynecol 104:685–689PubMedCrossRef Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Baessler K, Schluter PJ (2004) Midline rectovaginal fascial plication for repair of rectocele and obstructed defecation. Obstet Gynecol 104:685–689PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A new rectovaginal fascial plication technique for treatment of rectocele with obstructed defecation: a proof of concept study
Authors
Karin Schmidlin-Enderli
Bernhard Schuessler
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1911-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

International Urogynecology Journal 4/2013 Go to the issue