Skip to main content
Top
Literature
1.
go back to reference Digesu GA, Derpapas A, Khullar V (2011) Comment on Kirby et al.: preoperative voiding detrusor pressures do not predict stress incontinence surgery outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. doi:10.1007/s00192-011-1576-z Digesu GA, Derpapas A, Khullar V (2011) Comment on Kirby et al.: preoperative voiding detrusor pressures do not predict stress incontinence surgery outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-011-1576-z
2.
go back to reference Kirby AC, Nager CW, Litman HJ et al (2011) Preoperative voiding detrusor pressures do not predict stress incontinence surgery outcomes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 22(6):657–663. doi:10.1007/s00192-010-1336-5 CrossRef Kirby AC, Nager CW, Litman HJ et al (2011) Preoperative voiding detrusor pressures do not predict stress incontinence surgery outcomes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 22(6):657–663. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-010-1336-5 CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Digesu GA, Khullar V, Candiani M (2008) Re: urodynamic measures do not predict stress continence outcomes after surgery for stress urinary incontinence in selected women: C. W. Nager, M. FitzGerald, S. R. Kraus, T. C. Chai, H. Zyczynski, L. Sirls, G. E. Lemack, L. K. Lloyd, H. J. Litman, A. M. Stoddard, J. Baker and W. Steers for the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. J Urol 179:1470–1474, J Urol. 2009 Jan; 181(1):415–6; author reply 6–7CrossRef Digesu GA, Khullar V, Candiani M (2008) Re: urodynamic measures do not predict stress continence outcomes after surgery for stress urinary incontinence in selected women: C. W. Nager, M. FitzGerald, S. R. Kraus, T. C. Chai, H. Zyczynski, L. Sirls, G. E. Lemack, L. K. Lloyd, H. J. Litman, A. M. Stoddard, J. Baker and W. Steers for the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. J Urol 179:1470–1474, J Urol. 2009 Jan; 181(1):415–6; author reply 6–7CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hilton P (2002) Trials of surgery for stress incontinence–thoughts on the ‘Humpty Dumpty principle’. Bjog 109(10):1081–1088PubMed Hilton P (2002) Trials of surgery for stress incontinence–thoughts on the ‘Humpty Dumpty principle’. Bjog 109(10):1081–1088PubMed
5.
go back to reference Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Sethna F, Salvatore S (2004) Preoperative pressure-flow studies: useful variables to predict the outcome of continence surgery. BJU Int 94(9):1296–1299PubMedCrossRef Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Sethna F, Salvatore S (2004) Preoperative pressure-flow studies: useful variables to predict the outcome of continence surgery. BJU Int 94(9):1296–1299PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Panayi DC, Duckett J, Digesu GA et al (2009) Pre-operative opening detrusor pressure is predictive of detrusor overactivity following TVT in patients with pre-operative mixed urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 28(1):82–85PubMedCrossRef Panayi DC, Duckett J, Digesu GA et al (2009) Pre-operative opening detrusor pressure is predictive of detrusor overactivity following TVT in patients with pre-operative mixed urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 28(1):82–85PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nager CW, Albo ME, Fitzgerald MP et al (2007) Process for development of multicenter urodynamic studies. Urology 69(1):63–67, Discussion, 7–8PubMedCrossRef Nager CW, Albo ME, Fitzgerald MP et al (2007) Process for development of multicenter urodynamic studies. Urology 69(1):63–67, Discussion, 7–8PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L et al (2002) Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 21(3):261–274PubMedCrossRef Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L et al (2002) Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 21(3):261–274PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lewis P, Abrams P (2000) Urodynamic protocol and central review of data for clinical trials in lower urinary tract dysfunction. BJU Int 85(Suppl 1):20–30PubMedCrossRef Lewis P, Abrams P (2000) Urodynamic protocol and central review of data for clinical trials in lower urinary tract dysfunction. BJU Int 85(Suppl 1):20–30PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sullivan J, Lewis P, Howell S et al (2003) Quality control in urodynamics: a review of urodynamic traces from one centre. BJU Int 91(3):201–207PubMedCrossRef Sullivan J, Lewis P, Howell S et al (2003) Quality control in urodynamics: a review of urodynamic traces from one centre. BJU Int 91(3):201–207PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zimmern P, Nager CW, Albo M, Fitzgerald MP, McDermott S (2006) Interrater reliability of filling cystometrogram interpretation in a multicenter study. J Urol 175(6):2174–2177PubMedCrossRef Zimmern P, Nager CW, Albo M, Fitzgerald MP, McDermott S (2006) Interrater reliability of filling cystometrogram interpretation in a multicenter study. J Urol 175(6):2174–2177PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nager CW, Albo ME, Fitzgerald MP et al (2007) Reference urodynamic values for stress incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn 26(3):333–340PubMedCrossRef Nager CW, Albo ME, Fitzgerald MP et al (2007) Reference urodynamic values for stress incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn 26(3):333–340PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Preoperative voiding detrusor pressures do not predict stress incontinence surgery outcomes: reply to Digesu et al.
Author
Charles W. Nager
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1577-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

International Urogynecology Journal 3/2012 Go to the issue