Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 3/2011

01-03-2011 | Original Article

Five-year outcome of uterus sparing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a single-center experience

Authors: Elisabetta Costantini, Massimo Lazzeri, Alessandro Zucchi, Vittorio Bini, Luigi Mearini, Massimo Porena

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The study aims to report an extended follow-up of our case series of sacrohysteropexy for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Methods

Fifty-five patients with symptomatic POP underwent uterus sparing surgery. All patients were followed up for 1, 3, 6 and 12 months and then annually. Objective success was defined as a well-supported cervix and no vaginal prolapse stage ≥ 2. Subjective success was no prolapse-related symptoms or voiding disorder.

Results

The mean follow-up was 60 ± 34 months. Anterior compartment prolapse (cystocele) stage ≥ 2 was present in four out of 52 patients (7.7%), while posterior compartment prolapse (rectocele) stage ≥ 2 was present in three (5.7%). Voiding symptoms were resolved in 42 out of 45 patients (93.4%) and storage symptoms in 30 out of 36 (83.3%); one patient reported de novo urgency. Sexual activity was maintained in 28 out of 29 patients (95.5%). Four patients showed de novo stress urinary incontinence.

Conclusion

Our findings support the use of uterus preservation, with significative objective and subjective outcomes in treating POP.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svardsudd KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:299–305CrossRefPubMed Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svardsudd KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:299–305CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506CrossRefPubMed Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Subak LL, Waetjen LE, van den Eeden S, Thom DH, Vittinghoff E, Brown JS (2001) Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 98:646–651CrossRefPubMed Subak LL, Waetjen LE, van den Eeden S, Thom DH, Vittinghoff E, Brown JS (2001) Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 98:646–651CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network et al (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104:805–812CrossRefPubMed Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network et al (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104:805–812CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Swati JHA, Moran PA (2007) National survey of prolapse in the UK. Neurol Urodyn 26:325–331CrossRef Swati JHA, Moran PA (2007) National survey of prolapse in the UK. Neurol Urodyn 26:325–331CrossRef
6.
go back to reference de Boer TA, Milani AL, Kluivers KB, Withagen MI, Vierhout ME (2009) The effectiveness of surgical correction of uterine prolapse: cervical amputation with uterosacral ligament plication (modified Manchester) versus vaginal hysterectomy with high uterosacral ligament plication. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:1313–1319CrossRefPubMed de Boer TA, Milani AL, Kluivers KB, Withagen MI, Vierhout ME (2009) The effectiveness of surgical correction of uterine prolapse: cervical amputation with uterosacral ligament plication (modified Manchester) versus vaginal hysterectomy with high uterosacral ligament plication. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:1313–1319CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hilton P (2009) Long-term follow-up studies in pelvic floor dysfunction: the Holy Grail or a realistic aim. BJOG 115:135–143 Hilton P (2009) Long-term follow-up studies in pelvic floor dysfunction: the Holy Grail or a realistic aim. BJOG 115:135–143
8.
go back to reference Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17CrossRefPubMed Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178CrossRefPubMed Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Costantini E, Mearini L, Bini V, Zucchi A, Mearini E, Porena M (2005) Uterus preservation in surgical correction of urogenital prolapse. Eur Urol 48:642–649CrossRefPubMed Costantini E, Mearini L, Bini V, Zucchi A, Mearini E, Porena M (2005) Uterus preservation in surgical correction of urogenital prolapse. Eur Urol 48:642–649CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Altman D, Granath F, Cnattingius S, Falconer C (2007) Hysterectomy and risk of stress-urinary-incontinence surgery: nationwide cohort study. Lancet 370:1494–1499CrossRefPubMed Altman D, Granath F, Cnattingius S, Falconer C (2007) Hysterectomy and risk of stress-urinary-incontinence surgery: nationwide cohort study. Lancet 370:1494–1499CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Richardson DA, Scotti RJ, Ostergard DR (1989) Surgical management of uterine prolapse in young women. J Reprod Med 34:388–392PubMed Richardson DA, Scotti RJ, Ostergard DR (1989) Surgical management of uterine prolapse in young women. J Reprod Med 34:388–392PubMed
13.
go back to reference Kovac SR, Cruikshank SH (1993) Successful pregnancies and vaginal deliveries after sacrospinous uterosacral fixation in five of nineteen patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168:1778–1783PubMed Kovac SR, Cruikshank SH (1993) Successful pregnancies and vaginal deliveries after sacrospinous uterosacral fixation in five of nineteen patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168:1778–1783PubMed
14.
go back to reference Zucchi A, Lazzeri M Porena M, Del Zingaro M, Costantini E (2010) Uterus preservation in prolapse surgery. Nat Med 7:626–633 Zucchi A, Lazzeri M Porena M, Del Zingaro M, Costantini E (2010) Uterus preservation in prolapse surgery. Nat Med 7:626–633
15.
go back to reference Dietz V, Koops SES, van der Vaart CH (2009) Vaginal surgery for uterine descent; which options do we have? A review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J 20:349–356CrossRef Dietz V, Koops SES, van der Vaart CH (2009) Vaginal surgery for uterine descent; which options do we have? A review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J 20:349–356CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rozet F, Mandron E, Arroyo C et al (2005) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy approach for genito-urinary prolapse: experience with 363 cases. Eur Urol 47:230–236CrossRefPubMed Rozet F, Mandron E, Arroyo C et al (2005) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy approach for genito-urinary prolapse: experience with 363 cases. Eur Urol 47:230–236CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Price N, Slack A, Jakson SR (2010) Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse. BJOG 117:62–68CrossRefPubMed Price N, Slack A, Jakson SR (2010) Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse. BJOG 117:62–68CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Neuman M, Lavy Y (2007) Conservation of the prolapsed uterus is a valid option: medium term results of a prospective comparative study with the posterior intravaginal slingplasty operation. Int Urogynecol J 18:889–893CrossRef Neuman M, Lavy Y (2007) Conservation of the prolapsed uterus is a valid option: medium term results of a prospective comparative study with the posterior intravaginal slingplasty operation. Int Urogynecol J 18:889–893CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hefni M, El-Toukhy T, Bhaumik J, Katsimanis E (2003) Sacrospinous cervicocolpopexy with uterine conservation for uterovaginal prolapse in elderly women: an evolving concept. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:645–650CrossRefPubMed Hefni M, El-Toukhy T, Bhaumik J, Katsimanis E (2003) Sacrospinous cervicocolpopexy with uterine conservation for uterovaginal prolapse in elderly women: an evolving concept. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:645–650CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference van Brummen HJ, van de Pol G, Aalders CI, Heintz AP, van der Vaart CH (2003) Sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to vaginal hysterectomy as primary surgical treatment for a descensus uteri: effects on urinary symptoms. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14:350–355CrossRefPubMed van Brummen HJ, van de Pol G, Aalders CI, Heintz AP, van der Vaart CH (2003) Sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to vaginal hysterectomy as primary surgical treatment for a descensus uteri: effects on urinary symptoms. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14:350–355CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ozcan U, Gungor T, Ekin M, Eken S (1999) Sacrospinous fixation for the prolapsed vaginal vault. Gynecol Obstet Invest 47:65–68CrossRefPubMed Ozcan U, Gungor T, Ekin M, Eken S (1999) Sacrospinous fixation for the prolapsed vaginal vault. Gynecol Obstet Invest 47:65–68CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Nicita G, Li Marzi V, Filocamo MT et al (2005) Uterus-sparing vaginal surgery of genitourinary prolapse employing biocompatible material. Urol Int 75:314–318CrossRefPubMed Nicita G, Li Marzi V, Filocamo MT et al (2005) Uterus-sparing vaginal surgery of genitourinary prolapse employing biocompatible material. Urol Int 75:314–318CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Higgs P, Goh J, Krause H, Sloane K, Carey M (2005) Abdominal sacral colpopexy: an independent prospective long-term follow-up study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45:430–434CrossRefPubMed Higgs P, Goh J, Krause H, Sloane K, Carey M (2005) Abdominal sacral colpopexy: an independent prospective long-term follow-up study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45:430–434CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Lin LL, Ho MH, Haessler AL, Betson LH, Alisond RM, Liu CY, Bhatia NN (2005) A review of laparoscopic uterine suspension procedures for uterine preservation. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17:541–546CrossRefPubMed Lin LL, Ho MH, Haessler AL, Betson LH, Alisond RM, Liu CY, Bhatia NN (2005) A review of laparoscopic uterine suspension procedures for uterine preservation. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17:541–546CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Brubaker L, Cundiff GW, Fine P, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Visco AG et al (2006) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 354:1557–1566CrossRefPubMed Brubaker L, Cundiff GW, Fine P, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Visco AG et al (2006) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 354:1557–1566CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Costantini E, Zucchi A, Giannantoni A, Mearini L, Bini V, Porena M (2007) Must colposuspension be associated with sacropexy to prevent postoperative urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 51:788–794CrossRefPubMed Costantini E, Zucchi A, Giannantoni A, Mearini L, Bini V, Porena M (2007) Must colposuspension be associated with sacropexy to prevent postoperative urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 51:788–794CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Costantini E, Lazzeri M, Bini V, Del Zingaro M, Zucchi A, Porena M (2008) Burch colposuspension does not provide any additional benefit to pelvic organ prolapse repair in patients with urinary incontinence: a randomized surgical trial. J Urol 180:1007–1012CrossRefPubMed Costantini E, Lazzeri M, Bini V, Del Zingaro M, Zucchi A, Porena M (2008) Burch colposuspension does not provide any additional benefit to pelvic organ prolapse repair in patients with urinary incontinence: a randomized surgical trial. J Urol 180:1007–1012CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Five-year outcome of uterus sparing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a single-center experience
Authors
Elisabetta Costantini
Massimo Lazzeri
Alessandro Zucchi
Vittorio Bini
Luigi Mearini
Massimo Porena
Publication date
01-03-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1342-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

International Urogynecology Journal 3/2011 Go to the issue