Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 1/2011

01-01-2011 | Original Article

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: an observational study of functional and anatomical outcomes

Authors: Natalia Price, Alex Slack, Simon R. Jackson

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, in particular its effect on female sexual function.

Methods

A retrospective observational study of women undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy between February 2005 and March 2009 was undertaken. Pelvic organ support was assessed objectively using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification scale (POP-Q). Functional outcomes were assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence questionnaire for vaginal symptoms (ICIQ-VS), both preoperatively and at 6–36 months postoperatively.

Results

Eighty-four women with a mean age of 65 years (range, 49–78 years) were studied. At follow-up in clinic, all women had good vault support (mean point C, −8.9; range, 10 to −8). Subjective improvements in prolapse symptoms and sexual well-being were observed with significant reductions in the respective questionnaire scores.

Conclusions

Our results confirm previous findings that laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a safe and efficacious surgical treatment for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. It provides excellent apical support and good functional outcome with overall improvement in sexual function.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Marchionni M, Bracco GL, Checcucci V, Carabaneanu A, Coccia EM, Mececci F et al (1999) True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen years of experience. J Reprod Med 44:679–684PubMed Marchionni M, Bracco GL, Checcucci V, Carabaneanu A, Coccia EM, Mececci F et al (1999) True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen years of experience. J Reprod Med 44:679–684PubMed
2.
go back to reference Toozs-Hobson P, Boos K, Cardozo L (1998) Management of vaginal vault prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:13–17CrossRefPubMed Toozs-Hobson P, Boos K, Cardozo L (1998) Management of vaginal vault prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:13–17CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Flynn BJ, Webster GD (2002) Surgical management of the apical vaginal defect. Curr Opin Urol 12(4):353–358CrossRefPubMed Flynn BJ, Webster GD (2002) Surgical management of the apical vaginal defect. Curr Opin Urol 12(4):353–358CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sarma S, Ying T, Moore K (2009) Long-term vaginal ring pessary use: discontinuation rates and adverse events. BJOG 116:1715–1721CrossRefPubMed Sarma S, Ying T, Moore K (2009) Long-term vaginal ring pessary use: discontinuation rates and adverse events. BJOG 116:1715–1721CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Nygaad IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynaecol 104:805–823CrossRef Nygaad IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynaecol 104:805–823CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:20–26CrossRefPubMed Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:20–26CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E (1996) Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(6):1418–1421CrossRefPubMed Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E (1996) Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(6):1418–1421CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CMA, Adams EJ, Hagen S (2007) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3 Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CMA, Adams EJ, Hagen S (2007) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3
9.
go back to reference Agarwala N, Hasiak N, Shade M (2007) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with Gynemesh as graft material: experience and results. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:577–583CrossRefPubMed Agarwala N, Hasiak N, Shade M (2007) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with Gynemesh as graft material: experience and results. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:577–583CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sundaram CP, Venkatesh R, Landman J, Klutke CG (2004) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the correction of vaginal vault prolapse. J Endourol 18:620–623CrossRefPubMed Sundaram CP, Venkatesh R, Landman J, Klutke CG (2004) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the correction of vaginal vault prolapse. J Endourol 18:620–623CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ross JW, Preston M (2005) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for severe vaginal vault prolapse: 5-year outcome. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:221–226CrossRefPubMed Ross JW, Preston M (2005) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for severe vaginal vault prolapse: 5-year outcome. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:221–226CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Cosson M, Rajabally R, Bogaert E et al (2002) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, hysterectomy, and Burch colposuspension: feasibility and short-term complications of 77 procedures. JSLS 6:115–119PubMed Cosson M, Rajabally R, Bogaert E et al (2002) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, hysterectomy, and Burch colposuspension: feasibility and short-term complications of 77 procedures. JSLS 6:115–119PubMed
13.
go back to reference Higgs PJ, Chua HL, Smith AR (2005) Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. BJOG 112:1134–1138CrossRefPubMed Higgs PJ, Chua HL, Smith AR (2005) Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. BJOG 112:1134–1138CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference North C, Ali-Ross N, Smith A, Reid F (2009) A prospective study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG 116:1251–1257CrossRefPubMed North C, Ali-Ross N, Smith A, Reid F (2009) A prospective study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG 116:1251–1257CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17CrossRefPubMed Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Price N, Jackson SR, Avery K, Brookes ST, Abrams P (2006) Development and psychometric evaluation of the ICIQ Vaginal Symptoms Questionnaire: the ICIQ-VS. BJOG 113:700–712CrossRefPubMed Price N, Jackson SR, Avery K, Brookes ST, Abrams P (2006) Development and psychometric evaluation of the ICIQ Vaginal Symptoms Questionnaire: the ICIQ-VS. BJOG 113:700–712CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ostrzen’ski A (1992) Laser video-laparoscopic colpopexy. Ginekol Pol 63:317–323 Ostrzen’ski A (1992) Laser video-laparoscopic colpopexy. Ginekol Pol 63:317–323
18.
go back to reference Elneil S, Cutner A, Remy M, Leather A, Toozs-Hobson P, Wise B (2005) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse without burial of mesh: a case series. BJOG 112:486–489CrossRefPubMed Elneil S, Cutner A, Remy M, Leather A, Toozs-Hobson P, Wise B (2005) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse without burial of mesh: a case series. BJOG 112:486–489CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Neill C, Abdel-Fattah M, Ramsay IN (2009) Sexual function and vaginal surgery. Obstetrician Gynaecologist 11:193–198CrossRef Neill C, Abdel-Fattah M, Ramsay IN (2009) Sexual function and vaginal surgery. Obstetrician Gynaecologist 11:193–198CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ward KL, Hilton P, on behalf of the UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group (2008) Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG 115:226–33PubMed Ward KL, Hilton P, on behalf of the UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group (2008) Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG 115:226–33PubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: an observational study of functional and anatomical outcomes
Authors
Natalia Price
Alex Slack
Simon R. Jackson
Publication date
01-01-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1241-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

International Urogynecology Journal 1/2011 Go to the issue