Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 7/2009

01-07-2009 | Current Opinion / Update

Commercial pressures and professional ethics: Troubling revisions to the recent ACOG Practice Bulletins on surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

Authors: L. Lewis Wall, Douglas Brown

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 7/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Commercial interests are reshaping the practice of gynecological surgery by promoting the use of trochar-and-mesh surgical “kits” for the treatment of stress incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. In this article, we discuss the ethical implications of changes in surgical practice that are driven by commercial interests. We point out the dangers inherent in the adoption of new procedures without adequate and documented evidence to support their safety and efficacy. We discuss the most recent American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Practice Bulletins on pelvic organ prolapse (numbers 79 and 85) which were altered without explanation to downplay the experimental nature of these commercial products. We suggest that in so doing, ACOG is not meeting its fiduciary responsibilities to patients and is undermining important professional values.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nygaard I (2007) What does “FDA approved” mean for medical devices? Obstet Gynecol 111:4–6 Nygaard I (2007) What does “FDA approved” mean for medical devices? Obstet Gynecol 111:4–6
2.
go back to reference ACOG (2007) ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 79, “Pelvic organ prolapse”. ACOG, Washington, DC (February) ACOG (2007) ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 79, “Pelvic organ prolapse”. ACOG, Washington, DC (February)
3.
go back to reference ACOG (2007) ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 85, “Pelvic organ prolapse”. ACOG, Washington, DC (September) ACOG (2007) ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 85, “Pelvic organ prolapse”. ACOG, Washington, DC (September)
4.
go back to reference Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, Maher C, Jelovsek JE (2009) Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol 113:367–373PubMed Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, Maher C, Jelovsek JE (2009) Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol 113:367–373PubMed
5.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Ludbrook PA (2003) Who oversees innovative practice? Is there a structure that meets the monitoring needs of new techniques? J Am Coll Surg 196:938–948PubMedCrossRef Strasberg SM, Ludbrook PA (2003) Who oversees innovative practice? Is there a structure that meets the monitoring needs of new techniques? J Am Coll Surg 196:938–948PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Commercial pressures and professional ethics: Troubling revisions to the recent ACOG Practice Bulletins on surgery for pelvic organ prolapse
Authors
L. Lewis Wall
Douglas Brown
Publication date
01-07-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 7/2009
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0864-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2009

International Urogynecology Journal 7/2009 Go to the issue