Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 2/2008

01-02-2008 | Original Article

Effect of anatomic urethral length on the correlation between the Q-tip test and descent at point Aa of the POP-Q system

Authors: J. Robert Larrieux, Sunil Balgobin

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of anatomic urethral length on the relationship between descent at point Aa of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system and the Q-tip straining angle. The records of 323 patients who were evaluated for urinary incontinence were reviewed. Prolapse staging was performed using the POP-Q system. Urethrovesical junction hypermobility defined as a maximal straining angle ≥30° was assessed with the Q-tip test. Urethral length was measured with a urethral profilometer. A substantial correlation was found between descent at point Aa and the straining Q-tip angle (r = 0.65, p < 0.0001). There was no correlation between the anatomic urethral length and straining Q-tip angle (r = −0.01, p = 0.8). Urethral length does not affect the straining Q-tip angle. Point Aa is a strong predictor of an abnormal straining Q-tip angle in women with stage I anterior vaginal wall prolapse or greater.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Crystle CD, Charme LS, Copeland WE (1971) Q-tip test in stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 38:313–315PubMed Crystle CD, Charme LS, Copeland WE (1971) Q-tip test in stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 38:313–315PubMed
2.
go back to reference Noblett K, Lane FL, Driskill CS (2005) Does Pelvic Prolapse Quantification exam predicts urethral mobility in stages 0 and I prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 16:268–271CrossRef Noblett K, Lane FL, Driskill CS (2005) Does Pelvic Prolapse Quantification exam predicts urethral mobility in stages 0 and I prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 16:268–271CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cogan SL, Weber AM, Hammel JP (2002) Is urethral mobility really being assessed by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) System. Obstet Gynecol 99:473–476PubMedCrossRef Cogan SL, Weber AM, Hammel JP (2002) Is urethral mobility really being assessed by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) System. Obstet Gynecol 99:473–476PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Montella JM, Ewing S, Cater J (1997) Visual assessment of urethrovesical junction mobility. Int Urogynecol J 8:13–17CrossRef Montella JM, Ewing S, Cater J (1997) Visual assessment of urethrovesical junction mobility. Int Urogynecol J 8:13–17CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Matisson MJ, Simisiman AJ, Menefee SA (2006) Can urethral mobility be assessed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system? An analysis of the correlation of between point Aa and Q-tip angle in varying stages of prolapse. Urology 68:1005–1008CrossRef Matisson MJ, Simisiman AJ, Menefee SA (2006) Can urethral mobility be assessed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system? An analysis of the correlation of between point Aa and Q-tip angle in varying stages of prolapse. Urology 68:1005–1008CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bump RC, Mattison A, Bo K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17PubMedCrossRef Bump RC, Mattison A, Bo K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Karram MM, Bhatia NN (1998) The Q-tip test: standardization of the technique and its interpretation in women with urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 71:807–811 Karram MM, Bhatia NN (1998) The Q-tip test: standardization of the technique and its interpretation in women with urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 71:807–811
8.
go back to reference Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L (1997) Vaginal topography does not correlate well with visceral position in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 8:336–339CrossRef Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L (1997) Vaginal topography does not correlate well with visceral position in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 8:336–339CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rosencrantz M, Menefee SA, Lukacz ES (2006) The correlation of urethral mobility and point Aa of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system before and after surgery. Obstet Gynecol 195:1841–1845CrossRef Rosencrantz M, Menefee SA, Lukacz ES (2006) The correlation of urethral mobility and point Aa of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system before and after surgery. Obstet Gynecol 195:1841–1845CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pollack TJ, Jenkins P, Kopka SL, Davila GW (2003) Effect of genital prolapse on assessment of bladder neck mobility by the Q-tip test. Obstet Gynecol 101:662–665CrossRef Pollack TJ, Jenkins P, Kopka SL, Davila GW (2003) Effect of genital prolapse on assessment of bladder neck mobility by the Q-tip test. Obstet Gynecol 101:662–665CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of anatomic urethral length on the correlation between the Q-tip test and descent at point Aa of the POP-Q system
Authors
J. Robert Larrieux
Sunil Balgobin
Publication date
01-02-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0429-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

International Urogynecology Journal 2/2008 Go to the issue