Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 2/2007

01-02-2007 | Editorial

From “data mining” to “salami publication”—how (not) to present data

Author: Paul Riss

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Excerpt

The rules for setting up a study are relatively clear. You need a hypothesis, you need inclusion criteria, and you need clearly defined primary and secondary endpoints, which serve to put your original hypothesis to the test and—hopefully—answer a few questions relevant to clinical practice. Good study design follows accepted rules with randomized controlled trials currently considered as gold standard. At the completion of a trial, data are consolidated and evaluated according to the rules set out at the beginning of the trial. The hypothesis is accepted or rejected, and secondary endpoints are listed and provide additional information. Finally, the results are written up, and the manuscript is submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ward K, Hilton P; United Kingdom and Ireland Tension-free Vaginal Tape Trial Group (2002) Prospective multicentre randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence. BMJ 325(7355):67PubMedCrossRef Ward K, Hilton P; United Kingdom and Ireland Tension-free Vaginal Tape Trial Group (2002) Prospective multicentre randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence. BMJ 325(7355):67PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
From “data mining” to “salami publication”—how (not) to present data
Author
Paul Riss
Publication date
01-02-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0253-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

International Urogynecology Journal 2/2007 Go to the issue