Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 1/2006

01-01-2006 | Original Article

Patients’ knowledge of potential pelvic floor changes associated with pregnancy and delivery

Authors: Mary T. McLennan, Clifford F. Melick, Beverly Alten, Jacqueline Young, Melanie R. Hoehn

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Physicians cite pelvic floor injury as a major reason for Cesarean section as their personal preferred delivery mode. This study was undertaken to determine whether patients receive information about possible pelvic floor complications of pregnancy/delivery. Day 1 post-partum women completed a 52-item questionnaire assessing information given during routine antenatal care. Pelvic floor and general questions were intermixed. Of the 232 patients, the mean age was 26.9 years, with 59.5% white, 32.8% African-American and 7.7% other. Most (84.5%) had at least grade 12 education. The following percentage of patients reported receiving no information about: Kegel exercises 46.1%; episiotomy 51.3%; urinary incontinence 46.6%; fecal incontinence 80.6%; change in vaginal caliber 72.8%; neuropathy 84.9%. Counseling on all of these issues occurred significantly less frequently than education on general pregnancy topics. Our results suggest that knowledge and instruction of pelvic floor risks is very much lacking and provide us with an impetus to develop educational tools.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM (1997) Survey of obstetricians’ personal preferences and discretionary practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 73:1–4PubMed Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM (1997) Survey of obstetricians’ personal preferences and discretionary practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 73:1–4PubMed
2.
go back to reference Land R, Parry E, Rane A, Wilson D (2001) Personal preferences of obstetricians towards childbirth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 41:249–252PubMed Land R, Parry E, Rane A, Wilson D (2001) Personal preferences of obstetricians towards childbirth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 41:249–252PubMed
3.
go back to reference Nygaard I, Cruikshank DP (2003) Should all women be offered elective cesarean delivery? Obstet Gynecol 102:217–219PubMed Nygaard I, Cruikshank DP (2003) Should all women be offered elective cesarean delivery? Obstet Gynecol 102:217–219PubMed
4.
go back to reference Meyer JH Jr (2003) Informed consent, informed refusal, and informed choices. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:319–326PubMed Meyer JH Jr (2003) Informed consent, informed refusal, and informed choices. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:319–326PubMed
5.
go back to reference Stapleton H, Kirkham M, Thomas G (2002) Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care. BMJ 324:639–643PubMed Stapleton H, Kirkham M, Thomas G (2002) Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care. BMJ 324:639–643PubMed
6.
go back to reference Quinlivan JA, Petersen RW, Nichols CN (1999) Patient preference the leading indication for elective caesarean section in public patients – results of a 2-year prospective audit in a teaching hospital. Aust NZ Obstet Gynaecol 39:207–214 Quinlivan JA, Petersen RW, Nichols CN (1999) Patient preference the leading indication for elective caesarean section in public patients – results of a 2-year prospective audit in a teaching hospital. Aust NZ Obstet Gynaecol 39:207–214
7.
go back to reference Lau TK, Wong SH, Li CY (1996) A study of patients’ acceptance towards vaginal birth after caesarean section. Aust NZ Obstet Gynaecol 36:155–158 Lau TK, Wong SH, Li CY (1996) A study of patients’ acceptance towards vaginal birth after caesarean section. Aust NZ Obstet Gynaecol 36:155–158
8.
go back to reference Saisto T, Salmela-Aro K, Nurmi JE, Kononen T, Halmesmaki E (2001) A randomized controlled trial of intervention in fear of childbirth. Obstet Gynecol 98:820–826PubMed Saisto T, Salmela-Aro K, Nurmi JE, Kononen T, Halmesmaki E (2001) A randomized controlled trial of intervention in fear of childbirth. Obstet Gynecol 98:820–826PubMed
9.
go back to reference Green JM, Coupland VA, Kitzinger JV (1998) Great expectations; a prospective study of women’s expectations and experiences of childbirth. Cheshire, England: Books for midwives Practice 114–115 Green JM, Coupland VA, Kitzinger JV (1998) Great expectations; a prospective study of women’s expectations and experiences of childbirth. Cheshire, England: Books for midwives Practice 114–115
10.
go back to reference Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, Hannestad YS, Hunskaar S (2003) Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section. N Engl J Med 348:900–907PubMed Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, Hannestad YS, Hunskaar S (2003) Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section. N Engl J Med 348:900–907PubMed
11.
go back to reference Wilson PD, Herbison RM, Herbison GP (1996) Obstetric practice and the prevalence of urinary incontinence three months after delivery. BJOG 103:154–161 Wilson PD, Herbison RM, Herbison GP (1996) Obstetric practice and the prevalence of urinary incontinence three months after delivery. BJOG 103:154–161
12.
go back to reference Farrell SA, Allen VM, Baskett TF (2001) Anal incontinence in primiparas. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can 23:321–326 Farrell SA, Allen VM, Baskett TF (2001) Anal incontinence in primiparas. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can 23:321–326
13.
go back to reference Fynes M, Donnelly VS, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C (1998) Cesarean delivery and anal sphincter injury. Obstet Gynecol 92:496–500PubMed Fynes M, Donnelly VS, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C (1998) Cesarean delivery and anal sphincter injury. Obstet Gynecol 92:496–500PubMed
14.
go back to reference Snooks SJ, Henry MM, Swash M (1985) Fecal incontinence due to external anal sphincter division in childbirth is associated with damage to the innervation of the pelvic floor musculature; a double pathology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92:824–828PubMed Snooks SJ, Henry MM, Swash M (1985) Fecal incontinence due to external anal sphincter division in childbirth is associated with damage to the innervation of the pelvic floor musculature; a double pathology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92:824–828PubMed
15.
go back to reference Eason E, Labrecque M, Marcoux S, Mondor M (2002) Anal incontinence after childbirth. CMAJ 166:326–330PubMed Eason E, Labrecque M, Marcoux S, Mondor M (2002) Anal incontinence after childbirth. CMAJ 166:326–330PubMed
16.
go back to reference Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Chir M, Thomas JM, Bartram CI (1993) Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 329:1905–1911PubMed Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Chir M, Thomas JM, Bartram CI (1993) Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 329:1905–1911PubMed
17.
go back to reference Need JA (1987) Is “the trial of forceps”over? Med J Aust 146:613PubMed Need JA (1987) Is “the trial of forceps”over? Med J Aust 146:613PubMed
18.
go back to reference Farrell SA (2002) Cesarean section versus forceps-assisted vaginal birth: It’s time to include pelvic injury in the risk-benefit equation. CMAJ 166:337–338PubMed Farrell SA (2002) Cesarean section versus forceps-assisted vaginal birth: It’s time to include pelvic injury in the risk-benefit equation. CMAJ 166:337–338PubMed
19.
go back to reference Faden RR, Becker C, Lewis C, Freeman J, Faden AI (1981) Disclosure of information to patients in medical care. Med Care 19:718–733PubMed Faden RR, Becker C, Lewis C, Freeman J, Faden AI (1981) Disclosure of information to patients in medical care. Med Care 19:718–733PubMed
Metadata
Title
Patients’ knowledge of potential pelvic floor changes associated with pregnancy and delivery
Authors
Mary T. McLennan
Clifford F. Melick
Beverly Alten
Jacqueline Young
Melanie R. Hoehn
Publication date
01-01-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 1/2006
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-1325-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2006

International Urogynecology Journal 1/2006 Go to the issue