Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2005

01-12-2005 | Original Article

Severity of pelvic organ prolapse associated with measurements of pelvic floor function

Authors: Chiara Ghetti, W. Thomas Gregory, S. Renee Edwards, Lesley N. Otto, Amanda L. Clark

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 6/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that clinical measurements of the superficial perineum and of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function correlate with the severity of pelvic organ prolapse. This retrospective cross-sectional study assessed 1037 women in an academic urogynecologic practice. Greatest descent of prolapse, by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system, was correlated with two assessments of levator function—the Oxford grading scale and levator hiatus (LH) size measured by digital examination. Correlations were calculated using Pearson’s correlation for continuous variables and Kendall’s tau-b. Severity of prolapse correlated moderately with genital hiatus (GH) (r=0.5, p<0.0001) and with LH (transverse r=0.4, p<0.0001; longitudinal r=0.5, p<0.0001), but weakly with the Oxford grading scale (r=−0.16, p<0.0001). LH correlated with GH (r=0.5, p<0.0001) but not with perineal body (r=0.06, p=0.06). Both GH and LH size are associated with the severity of prolapse. LH size correlates more strongly to prolapse severity than assessment of PFM function by the Oxford grading scale.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Berglas B, Rubin IC (1953) Study of the supportive structures of the uterus by levator myography. Surg Gynecol Obstet 97:677–692 Berglas B, Rubin IC (1953) Study of the supportive structures of the uterus by levator myography. Surg Gynecol Obstet 97:677–692
2.
go back to reference Singh K, Reid WMN, Berger LA (2001) Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:71–77CrossRef Singh K, Reid WMN, Berger LA (2001) Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:71–77CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Singh K, Jakab M, Reid WM, Berger LA, Hoyte L (2003) Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging assessment of levator ani morphologic features in different grades of prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:910–915CrossRef Singh K, Jakab M, Reid WM, Berger LA, Hoyte L (2003) Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging assessment of levator ani morphologic features in different grades of prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:910–915CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hoyte L, Schierlitz L, Zou K, Flesh G, Fielding JR (2001) Two- and 3-dimensional MRI comparison of levator ani structure, volume, and integrity in women with stress incontinence and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:11–19CrossRef Hoyte L, Schierlitz L, Zou K, Flesh G, Fielding JR (2001) Two- and 3-dimensional MRI comparison of levator ani structure, volume, and integrity in women with stress incontinence and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:11–19CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Delancey JO, Hurd WW (1998) Size of the urogenital hiatus in the levator ani muscles in normal women and women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 91:364–368CrossRefPubMed Delancey JO, Hurd WW (1998) Size of the urogenital hiatus in the levator ani muscles in normal women and women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 91:364–368CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17PubMed Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17PubMed
7.
go back to reference Hall AF, Theofrasous JP, Cundiff GW et al (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1467–1471PubMed Hall AF, Theofrasous JP, Cundiff GW et al (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1467–1471PubMed
8.
go back to reference Bo K, Finckenhagen HB (2001) Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: inter-test reproducibility and comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:883–887CrossRef Bo K, Finckenhagen HB (2001) Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: inter-test reproducibility and comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:883–887CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Woolson RF (1987) Statistical methods for the analysis of biomedical data. Wiley, New York Woolson RF (1987) Statistical methods for the analysis of biomedical data. Wiley, New York
10.
go back to reference Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:1160–1166CrossRef Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:1160–1166CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Phelps JY, Higby K, Smyth MH, Ward JA, Arredondo F, Mayer AR (1995) Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:942–945CrossRef Phelps JY, Higby K, Smyth MH, Ward JA, Arredondo F, Mayer AR (1995) Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:942–945CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Severity of pelvic organ prolapse associated with measurements of pelvic floor function
Authors
Chiara Ghetti
W. Thomas Gregory
S. Renee Edwards
Lesley N. Otto
Amanda L. Clark
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 6/2005
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1274-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2005

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2005 Go to the issue