Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 4/2021

01-04-2021 | KNEE

Healthy middle-aged Asian and Caucasian populations present with large intra- and inter-individual variations of lower limb torsion

Authors: P. Mathon, G. Micicoi, R. Seil, B. Kacaoglu, S. Cerciello, F. Ahmad, S. LiArno, R. Teitge, Matthieu Ollivier

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

There is a lack of standardization in the measurement of lower limb torsional alignment. Normal values published in the literature are inconsistent. A 3D-CT-scan-based method was used in a healthy population to define the femoral neck version (FNV) and the tibial torsion (TT) and their relationship with demographic parameters. The study objectives were (1) to define normal values of lower limb torsional alignment, (2) to estimate inter- and intra-individual variations of torsional deformity of healthy individuals’ lower limbs. The hypothesis was that FNV and TT values would be influenced by patient characteristics such as gender, age, and ethnicity, and would have low side-to-side asymmetry.

Methods

Torsional landmarks of the lower limbs from 191 healthy subjects were automatically calculated with a 3D CT-scan-based program. The FNV was defined by the angle between the femoral neck axis and the femoral posterior condylar line. The TT angle was considered between the tibial plateau axis and the axis of the ankle. For the former, two alternatives were considered: the line connecting the more medial and lateral point of the medial and lateral plateau, respectively (method 1; TT1), or the line connecting the two more posterior points of the medial et lateral plateau (method 2; TT2). The ankle axis was defined as the line connecting the medial and lateral malleoli. These reference lines were automatically calculated. Age, gender, ethnic group, and BMI were recorded for every subject. A p value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Overall, the mean FNV was 15.3 ± 9.5° and the mean TT was 31.6 ± 6.3°. Female hips were more anteverted than male hips. Caucasians had less anteverted hips than Asians, but more externally rotated tibias. Age and BMI were not correlated with any anatomical parameter. A substantial side-to-side asymmetry was found for FNV [absolute difference (AD) = 6.3°; percentage of asymmetry (%As) = 47%], TT1 (AD = 3°; %As = 12%), and TT2 (AD = 4.9°; %As = 9%) (p = 0.008).

Conclusion

The findings showed that lower limb torsional parameters were highly variable from patient to patient and from one leg to the other for the same patient. The understanding of normal values concerning femoral version and external tibial torsion in the present healthy population will help surgeons to define pathological values of FNV and TT, as well as corrections to perform in case of torsional deformities.

Level of evidence

Level III.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Banerjee S, Faizan A, Nevelos J, Kreuzer S, Burgkart R, Harwin SF, Mont MA (2014) Innovations in hip arthroplasty three-dimensional modeling and analytical technology (SOMA). Surg Technol Int 24:288–294PubMed Banerjee S, Faizan A, Nevelos J, Kreuzer S, Burgkart R, Harwin SF, Mont MA (2014) Innovations in hip arthroplasty three-dimensional modeling and analytical technology (SOMA). Surg Technol Int 24:288–294PubMed
2.
go back to reference Bouchard R, Meeder PJ, Krug F, Libicher M (2004) Evaluation of tibial torsion—comparison of clinicalmethods and computed tomography. Rofo 176:1278–1284CrossRef Bouchard R, Meeder PJ, Krug F, Libicher M (2004) Evaluation of tibial torsion—comparison of clinicalmethods and computed tomography. Rofo 176:1278–1284CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Carmona M, Tzioup C, LiArno S, Faizan H, Argenson JN, Ollivier M (2019) Upper femur anatomy depends on age and gender: a three-dimensional computed tomography comparative bone morphometric analysis of 628 healthy patients. Hips J Arthroplast 34:2487–2493CrossRef Carmona M, Tzioup C, LiArno S, Faizan H, Argenson JN, Ollivier M (2019) Upper femur anatomy depends on age and gender: a three-dimensional computed tomography comparative bone morphometric analysis of 628 healthy patients. Hips J Arthroplast 34:2487–2493CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cobb JP, Dixon H, Dandachli W, Iranpour F (2008) The anatomical tibial axis. J Bone Jt Surg Br 90-B(8):1032–1038CrossRef Cobb JP, Dixon H, Dandachli W, Iranpour F (2008) The anatomical tibial axis. J Bone Jt Surg Br 90-B(8):1032–1038CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dargel J, Feiser J, Gotter M, Pennig D, Koebke J (2009) Side differences in the anatomy of human knee joints. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1368–1376CrossRef Dargel J, Feiser J, Gotter M, Pennig D, Koebke J (2009) Side differences in the anatomy of human knee joints. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1368–1376CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gottschling H, Schröder M, Reimers N, Fischer F, Homeier A, Burgkart R (2009) A system for performing automated measurements on large bone databases. IFMBE Proc 25:910–913CrossRef Gottschling H, Schröder M, Reimers N, Fischer F, Homeier A, Burgkart R (2009) A system for performing automated measurements on large bone databases. IFMBE Proc 25:910–913CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Grisch D, Dreher T (2019) Torsion and torsional development of the lower extremities. Orthopade 48:523–530CrossRef Grisch D, Dreher T (2019) Torsion and torsional development of the lower extremities. Orthopade 48:523–530CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Guidera KJ, Ganey TM, Keneally CR, Ogden JA (1994) The embryologyoflower-extremity torsion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 302:17–21 Guidera KJ, Ganey TM, Keneally CR, Ogden JA (1994) The embryologyoflower-extremity torsion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 302:17–21
9.
go back to reference Gulan G, Matovinović D, Nemec B, Rubinić D, Ravlić-Gulan J (2000) Femoral neck anteversion: values, development, measurement, common problems. Coll Antropol 24:521–527PubMed Gulan G, Matovinović D, Nemec B, Rubinić D, Ravlić-Gulan J (2000) Femoral neck anteversion: values, development, measurement, common problems. Coll Antropol 24:521–527PubMed
11.
go back to reference Hernandez RJ, Tachdjian MO, Poznanski AK, Dias LS (1981) CT determination of femoral torsion. Am J Roentgenol 137:97–101CrossRef Hernandez RJ, Tachdjian MO, Poznanski AK, Dias LS (1981) CT determination of femoral torsion. Am J Roentgenol 137:97–101CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hovinga KR, Lerner AL (2009) Anatomic variations between Japanese and Caucasian populations in the healthy young adult knee joint. J Orthop Res 27:1191–1196CrossRef Hovinga KR, Lerner AL (2009) Anatomic variations between Japanese and Caucasian populations in the healthy young adult knee joint. J Orthop Res 27:1191–1196CrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Jain AK, Maheshwari AV, Nath S, Singh MPNM (2003) Anteversion of the femoral neck in Indian dry femora. J Orthop Sci 8:334–340CrossRef Jain AK, Maheshwari AV, Nath S, Singh MPNM (2003) Anteversion of the femoral neck in Indian dry femora. J Orthop Sci 8:334–340CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kaiser P, Konschake M, Loth F, Plaikner M, Attal R, Liebensteiner M, Schlumberger M (2020) Derotational femoral osteotomy changes patella tilt, patella engagement and tibial tuberosity trochlear groove distance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:926–933CrossRef Kaiser P, Konschake M, Loth F, Plaikner M, Attal R, Liebensteiner M, Schlumberger M (2020) Derotational femoral osteotomy changes patella tilt, patella engagement and tibial tuberosity trochlear groove distance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:926–933CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kinzinger H, Castiaux P (1977) Les vices de torsion des membres inférieurs. Historique, évolution clinique. Acta Orthop Belg 43:379–470PubMed Kinzinger H, Castiaux P (1977) Les vices de torsion des membres inférieurs. Historique, évolution clinique. Acta Orthop Belg 43:379–470PubMed
17.
go back to reference Laumonerie P, Cavaignac E, Ollivier M, Argenson JN, LiArno S, Faizan A (2018) Which factors influence proximal femoral asymmetry? Bone Jt J 100B:839–844CrossRef Laumonerie P, Cavaignac E, Ollivier M, Argenson JN, LiArno S, Faizan A (2018) Which factors influence proximal femoral asymmetry? Bone Jt J 100B:839–844CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lerat JL (1982) Taussig G Les anomalies de rotation des membres inférieurs. Rev Chir Orthop 68:1–74 Lerat JL (1982) Taussig G Les anomalies de rotation des membres inférieurs. Rev Chir Orthop 68:1–74
19.
go back to reference Liodakis E, Doxastaki I, Chu K (2012) Reliability of the assessment of lower limb torsion using computed tomography: analysis of five different techniques. Skelet Radiol 41:305–311CrossRef Liodakis E, Doxastaki I, Chu K (2012) Reliability of the assessment of lower limb torsion using computed tomography: analysis of five different techniques. Skelet Radiol 41:305–311CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Murphy SB, Simon SR, Kijewski PK, Wilkinson RH, Griscom NT (1987) Femoral anteversion. J Bone Jt Surg 69:1169–1176CrossRef Murphy SB, Simon SR, Kijewski PK, Wilkinson RH, Griscom NT (1987) Femoral anteversion. J Bone Jt Surg 69:1169–1176CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ (1988) The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235(6):148–165 Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ (1988) The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235(6):148–165
22.
go back to reference Ollivier M, Parratte S, Lecorroller T, Reggiori A, Champsaur P, Argenson J-N (2014) Anatomy of the proximal femur at the time of total hip arthroplasty is a matter of morphotype and etiology but not gender. Surg Radiol Anat 4:377–384 Ollivier M, Parratte S, Lecorroller T, Reggiori A, Champsaur P, Argenson J-N (2014) Anatomy of the proximal femur at the time of total hip arthroplasty is a matter of morphotype and etiology but not gender. Surg Radiol Anat 4:377–384
23.
go back to reference Park J, Kim JY, Kim HD, Kim YC, Seo A, Je M, Mun UJ, Bia K, Park HI, Kim SY (2017) Analysis of acetabular orientation and femoral anteversion using images of three-dimensional reconstructed bone models. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12(10):855–864CrossRef Park J, Kim JY, Kim HD, Kim YC, Seo A, Je M, Mun UJ, Bia K, Park HI, Kim SY (2017) Analysis of acetabular orientation and femoral anteversion using images of three-dimensional reconstructed bone models. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12(10):855–864CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Reikerås O, Høiseth A (1989) Torsion of the leg determined by computed tomography. Acta Orthop Scand 60:330–333CrossRef Reikerås O, Høiseth A (1989) Torsion of the leg determined by computed tomography. Acta Orthop Scand 60:330–333CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, Aubaniac JM (1992) The morphology of the proximal femur. A three-dimensional radiographic analysis. J Bone Jt Surg 74:28–32CrossRef Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, Aubaniac JM (1992) The morphology of the proximal femur. A three-dimensional radiographic analysis. J Bone Jt Surg 74:28–32CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Schmidt W, LiArno S, Khlopas A, Petersik A, Mont MA (2018) Stryker orthopaedic modeling and analytics (SOMA): a review. Surg Technol Int 32:315–324PubMed Schmidt W, LiArno S, Khlopas A, Petersik A, Mont MA (2018) Stryker orthopaedic modeling and analytics (SOMA): a review. Surg Technol Int 32:315–324PubMed
27.
go back to reference Schneider B, Laubenberger J, Jemlich S, Groene K, Weber HM, Langer M (1997) Measurement of femoral antetorsion and tibial torsion by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 70:575–579CrossRef Schneider B, Laubenberger J, Jemlich S, Groene K, Weber HM, Langer M (1997) Measurement of femoral antetorsion and tibial torsion by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 70:575–579CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Schröder M, Gottschling H, Reimers N, Hauschild M, Burgkart R (2014) Automated morphometric analysis of the femur on large anatomical databases with highly accurate correspondence detection. Open Med J 1:15–22CrossRef Schröder M, Gottschling H, Reimers N, Hauschild M, Burgkart R (2014) Automated morphometric analysis of the femur on large anatomical databases with highly accurate correspondence detection. Open Med J 1:15–22CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Strecker W, Keppler P, Gebhard F, Kinzl L (1997) Length and torsion of the lower limb. J Bone Jt Surg 79:1019–1023CrossRef Strecker W, Keppler P, Gebhard F, Kinzl L (1997) Length and torsion of the lower limb. J Bone Jt Surg 79:1019–1023CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Tamari K, Briffa K, Tinley P, Aoyagi K (2007) Variations in torsion of the lower limb in Japanese and Caucasians with and without knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 34:145–150PubMed Tamari K, Briffa K, Tinley P, Aoyagi K (2007) Variations in torsion of the lower limb in Japanese and Caucasians with and without knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 34:145–150PubMed
32.
go back to reference Tamari K, Tinley P, Briffa K, Aoyagi K (2005) Ethnic-, gender-, and age-related differences in femorotibial angle, femoral antetorsion, and tibiofibular torsion: cross-sectional study among healthy Japanese and Australian Caucasians. Clin Anat 19:59–67CrossRef Tamari K, Tinley P, Briffa K, Aoyagi K (2005) Ethnic-, gender-, and age-related differences in femorotibial angle, femoral antetorsion, and tibiofibular torsion: cross-sectional study among healthy Japanese and Australian Caucasians. Clin Anat 19:59–67CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Taussig G (1995) Les anomalies de rotation des membres inférieurs chez l’enfant. J de Pediatrie et Pueric 8:131–136 Taussig G (1995) Les anomalies de rotation des membres inférieurs chez l’enfant. J de Pediatrie et Pueric 8:131–136
34.
go back to reference Vanhove F, Noppe N, Fragomen A, Hoekstra H, Vanderschueren G, Metsemakers WJ (2019) Standardization of torsional CT measurements of the lower limbs with threshold values for corrective osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139:795–805CrossRef Vanhove F, Noppe N, Fragomen A, Hoekstra H, Vanderschueren G, Metsemakers WJ (2019) Standardization of torsional CT measurements of the lower limbs with threshold values for corrective osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139:795–805CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Waidelich H, Strecker W, Schneider E (1992) Computed tomographic torsion-angle and length measurement of the lower extremity. The methods, normal values and radiation load. Fortschr Röntgenstr 157:245–251CrossRef Waidelich H, Strecker W, Schneider E (1992) Computed tomographic torsion-angle and length measurement of the lower extremity. The methods, normal values and radiation load. Fortschr Röntgenstr 157:245–251CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Waldt S (2013) Lower limb alignments. In: Waldt S (ed) Measurements and classifications in musculoskeletal radiology. George Thieme Verlag KG, New York, pp 5–10 Waldt S (2013) Lower limb alignments. In: Waldt S (ed) Measurements and classifications in musculoskeletal radiology. George Thieme Verlag KG, New York, pp 5–10
37.
go back to reference Weiner DS, Cook AJ, Hoyt WA Jr, Oravec CE (1978) Computed tomography in themeasurement of femoral anteversion. Orthopedics 1:299–306CrossRef Weiner DS, Cook AJ, Hoyt WA Jr, Oravec CE (1978) Computed tomography in themeasurement of femoral anteversion. Orthopedics 1:299–306CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Yoshioka Y, Siu DW, Scudamore RA, Cooke TDV (1989) Tibial anatomy and functional axes. J Orthop Res 7:132–137CrossRef Yoshioka Y, Siu DW, Scudamore RA, Cooke TDV (1989) Tibial anatomy and functional axes. J Orthop Res 7:132–137CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Healthy middle-aged Asian and Caucasian populations present with large intra- and inter-individual variations of lower limb torsion
Authors
P. Mathon
G. Micicoi
R. Seil
B. Kacaoglu
S. Cerciello
F. Ahmad
S. LiArno
R. Teitge
Matthieu Ollivier
Publication date
01-04-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06096-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 4/2021 Go to the issue