Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8/2018

01-08-2018 | Shoulder

Regional histologic differences in the long head of the biceps tendon following subpectoral biceps tenodesis in patients with rotator cuff tears and SLAP lesions

Authors: Sergio A. Glait, Siddharth Mahure, Cynthia A. Loomis, Michael Cammer, Hien Pham, Andrew Feldman, Laith M. Jazrawi, Eric J. Strauss

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to quantify the regional histology of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) and compare the histopathology present to clinical findings in patients with rotator cuff tears and SLAP lesions.

Methods

Prospectively enrolled patients undergoing an open subpectoral LHBT tenodesis in the setting of a rotator cuff (RTC) tear or SLAP lesion. Perioperative data were collected and the excised LHBT was analyzed by a fellowship trained pathologist. Tendons were sectioned into proximal (biceps anchor), middle (bicipital groove), and distal (myotendinous junction) portions. Sections were stained with Movat’s pentachrome stain and digitized for analysis. Comparisons were made between the histologic findings present in the setting of a rotator cuff tear with those seen in the setting of a SLAP tear.

Results

39 tendons were analyzed: 20 from patients with SLAP lesions (mean age of 44.7 years, range 23–60 years) and 19 from patients with rotator cuff tears (mean age of 58.7 years, range 43–71). Patients with the most pathologic tendons in the bicipital groove were significantly older (59.4 vs. 50.4 years; p < 0.05), reported higher pre-operative VAS scores (6.6 vs. 5.0; p < 0.02), and demonstrated lower pre-operative ASES scores (41.6 vs. 50.7; p < 0.05). The RTC group showed significantly more mucinous degeneration at both the proximal (p < 0.03) and the middle (p < 0.01) tendon portions compared to the SLAP group. In both groups, the portions of proximal tendon showed significantly (p < 0.05) more mucinous degeneration than distal portions.

Conclusion

Regional histologic differences exist in the LHBT. Rotator cuff patients showed the most degenerated tendon in the bicipital groove and these patients tended to be older and have higher VAS and lower ASES scores. Surgeons should consider performing a subpectoral biceps tenodesis as the bicipital groove portion of the tendon may be very degenerated, especially in patients with rotator cuff disease. Additional research is warranted to distinguish whether treating the biceps differently in distinct geographic regions affects patient outcomes.

Level of evidence

II.
Literature
1.
Ahrens PM, Boileau P (2007) The long head of biceps and associated tendinopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1001–1009CrossRefPubMed
2.
Alpantaki K, McLaughlin D, Karagogeos D, Hadjipavlou A, Kontakis G (2005) Sympathetic and sensory neural elements in the tendon of the long head of the biceps. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1580–1583PubMed
3.
Becker DA, Cofield RH (1989) Tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii for chronic bicipital tendinitis. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:376–381CrossRefPubMed
4.
Berenson MC, Blevins FT, Plaas AH, Vogel KG (1996) Proteoglycans of Human rotator cuff tendons. J Orthop Res 14:518–525CrossRefPubMed
5.
Boileau P, Parratte S, Chuinard C, Roussanne Y, Shia D, Bicknell R (2009) Arthroscopic treatment of isolated type Ii Slap lesions: biceps tenodesis as an alternative to reinsertion. Am J Sports Med 37:929–936CrossRefPubMed
6.
Denard PJ, Ladermann A, Parsley BK, Burkhart SS (2014) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis compared with repair of isolated type Ii Slap lesions in patients older than 35 years. Orthopedics 37:e292–e297CrossRefPubMed
7.
Gurnani N, van Deurzen DF, Janmaat VT, van den Bekerom MP (2016) Tenotomy or tenodesis for pathology of the long head of the biceps brachii: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:3765–3771CrossRefPubMed
8.
Hart ND, Golish SR, Dragoo JL (2012) Effects of arm position on maximizing intra-articular visualization of the biceps tendon: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 28:481–485CrossRefPubMed
9.
Hsu AR, Ghodadra NS, Provencher MT, Lewis PB, Bach BR (2011) Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a review of clinical outcomes and biomechanical results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:326–332CrossRefPubMed
10.
Ide J, Maeda S, Takagi K (2005) Sports activity after arthroscopic superior labral repair using suture anchors in overhead-throwing athletes. Am J Sports Med 33:507–514CrossRefPubMed
11.
Jarvinen M, Jozsa L, Kannus P, Jarvinen TL, Kvist M, Leadbetter W (1997) Histopathological findings in chronic tendon disorders. Scand J Med Sci Sports 7:86–95CrossRefPubMed
12.
Joseph M, Maresh CM, McCarthy MB, Kraemer WJ, Ledgard F, Arciero CL et al (2009) Histological and molecular analysis of the biceps tendon long head post-tenotomy. J Orthop Res 27:1379–1385CrossRefPubMed
13.
Khan KMBF., Desmond PM, Cook JL, Young DA, Visentini PJ et al (1996) Patellar tendinosis (Jumper’s Knee): findings at histopathologic examination, us, and mr imaging. Victorian institute of sport tendon study group. Radiology 200:821–827CrossRefPubMed
14.
Kim TK, Queale WS, Cosgarea AJ, McFarland EG (2003) Clinical features of the different types of slap lesions: an analysis of one hundred and thirty-nine cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:66–71CrossRefPubMed
15.
Kurdziel MD, Moravek JE, Wiater BP, Davidson A, Seta J, Maerz T et al (2015) The impact of rotator cuff deficiency on structure, mechanical properties, and gene expression profiles of the long head of the biceps tendon (Lhbt): implications for management of the lhbt during primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 33:1158–1164CrossRefPubMed
16.
Lakemeier S, Reichelt JJ, Timmesfeld N, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Paletta JR, Schofer MD (2010) The relevance of long head biceps degeneration in the presence of rotator cuff tears. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Lakemeier S, Schwuchow SA, Peterlein CD, Foelsch C, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Archontidou-Aprin E et al (2010) Expression of matrix metalloproteinases 1, 3, and 9 in degenerated long head biceps tendon in the presence of rotator cuff tears: an immunohistological study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:271CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Mazzocca AD, McCarthy MB, Ledgard FA, Chowaniec DM, McKinnon WJ Jr, Delaronde S et al (2013) Histomorphologic changes of the long head of the biceps tendon in common shoulder pathologies. Arthroscopy 29:972–981CrossRefPubMed
19.
Moon SC, Cho NS, Rhee YG (2015) Analysis of “Hidden Lesions” of the extra-articular biceps after subpectoral biceps tenodesis: the subpectoral portion as the optimal tenodesis site. Am J Sports Med 43:63–68CrossRefPubMed
20.
Murthi AM, Vosburgh CL, Neviaser TJ (2000) The incidence of pathologic changes of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:382–385CrossRefPubMed
21.
Refior HJ, Sowa D (1995) Long tendon of the biceps brachii: sites of predilection for degenerative lesions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4:436–440CrossRefPubMed
22.
Russ JC (2011) The image processing handbook, Sixth edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
23.
Schroder CP, Skare O, Reikeras O, Mowinckel P, Brox JI (2017) Sham surgery versus labral repair or biceps tenodesis for type Ii slap lesions of the shoulder: a three-armed randomised clinical trial. Br J Sports Med 51:1759–1766CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Slenker NR, Lawson K, Ciccotti MG, Dodson CC, Cohen SB (2012) Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy 28:576–582CrossRefPubMed
25.
Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Porucznik CA, Powell AP (2009) Minimal Clinically important differences (Mcid) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (Pass) for visual analog scales (Vas) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:927–932CrossRefPubMed
26.
Taylor SA, Fabricant PD, Bansal M, Khair MM, McLawhorn A, DiCarlo EF et al (2015) The anatomy and histology of the bicipital tunnel of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24:511–519CrossRefPubMed
27.
Taylor SA, Khair MM, Gulotta LV, Pearle AD, Baret NJ, Newman AM et al (2015) Diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy fails to fully evaluate the biceps-labral complex. Arthroscopy 31:215–224CrossRefPubMed
28.
Walch G, Edwards TB, Boulahia A, Nove-Josserand L, Neyton L, Szabo I (2005) Arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: clinical and radiographic results of 307 cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:238–246CrossRefPubMed
29.
Werner BC, Evans CL, Holzgrefe RE, Tuman JM, Hart JM, Carson EW et al (2014) Arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of minimum 2-year clinical outcomes. Am J Sports Med 42:2583–2590CrossRefPubMed
30.
Wittstein JR, Queen R, Abbey A, Toth A, Moorman CT 3rd (2011) Isokinetic strength, endurance, and subjective outcomes after biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a postoperative study. Am J Sports Med 39:857–865CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Regional histologic differences in the long head of the biceps tendon following subpectoral biceps tenodesis in patients with rotator cuff tears and SLAP lesions
Authors
Sergio A. Glait
Siddharth Mahure
Cynthia A. Loomis
Michael Cammer
Hien Pham
Andrew Feldman
Laith M. Jazrawi
Eric J. Strauss
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4839-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8/2018 Go to the issue

Knee

Low re-rupture rate with BPTB autograft and semitendinosus gracilis autograft with preserved insertions in ACL reconstruction surgery in sports persons

Hip

Fascia iliaca blockade with the addition of liposomal bupivacaine vs. plain bupivacaine for perioperative pain management following hip arthroscopy

Knee

It is safe and effective to use all inside meniscal repair devices for posteromedial meniscal ‘ramp’ lesions

Knee

Meniscus repairs can be saved in the event of postoperative septic arthritis

Knee

Discoid lateral meniscus can be overlooked by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with meniscal tears

Knee

Association between incision technique for hamstring tendon harvest in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and the risk of injury to the infra-patellar branch of the saphenous nerve: a meta-analysis