Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 9/2018

01-09-2018 | Knee

Successful adaption of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 into German

Authors: Christoph Becher, René Attal, Peter Balcarek, Florian Dirisamer, Michael Liebensteiner, Geert Pagenstert, Philip Schöttle, Gerd Seitlinger, Daniel Wagner

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to adapt, translate, and validate the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 into German, enabling its use by German-speaking professionals for the evaluation of patients who present with patellofemoral instability.

Methods

Forward and backward translation was performed according to international recommendations. The final German version of the BPII 2.0 was investigated in patients with confirmed diagnoses of recurrent patellofemoral instability in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. All patients received two packages of questionnaires, each containing the BPII 2.0, Kujala scoring questionnaire, Norwich Patella Instability scoring questionnaire, Short Form-36 (SF-36), and a visual analogue scale (VAS)—scale for pain and disability. The first and second packages of questionnaires were to be completed 7 days apart. The following parameters were assessed: internal consistency, test–retest reliability, floor and ceiling effects, and construct validity.

Results

The study population consisted of 64 patients (24 males and 40 females). The average age of the patients was 22 ± 6 years. The internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) was excellent at both time points (0.93 and 0.95), and the test–retest reliability (ICC) was good (0.89). There were no floor or ceiling effects. There were statistically significant correlations between the BPII 2.0 and all other outcome measures apart from SF-36 mental health.

Conclusion

The BPII 2.0 was successfully adapted into German. It is a reliable and valid instrument for evaluation of German-speaking patients who present with patellofemoral instability.

Level of evidence

III.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bullinger M (1995) German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med 41(10):1359–1366CrossRefPubMed Bullinger M (1995) German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med 41(10):1359–1366CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ, Warrington WG (1951) Time-limit tests: estimating their reliability and degree of speeding. Psychometrika 16(2):167–188CrossRefPubMed Cronbach LJ, Warrington WG (1951) Time-limit tests: estimating their reliability and degree of speeding. Psychometrika 16(2):167–188CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hiemstra LA, Kerslake S, Lafave M, Mohtadi NG (2016) Concurrent validation of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument to the Norwich Patellar Instability Score and the Kujala Score in patients with patellofemoral instability. Orthop J Sports Med 4(5):2325967116646085PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hiemstra LA, Kerslake S, Lafave M, Mohtadi NG (2016) Concurrent validation of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument to the Norwich Patellar Instability Score and the Kujala Score in patients with patellofemoral instability. Orthop J Sports Med 4(5):2325967116646085PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hiemstra LA, Kerslake S, Lafave MR, Heard SM, Buchko GM, Mohtadi NG (2013) Initial validity and reliability of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument. Am J Sports Med 41(7):1629–1635CrossRefPubMed Hiemstra LA, Kerslake S, Lafave MR, Heard SM, Buchko GM, Mohtadi NG (2013) Initial validity and reliability of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument. Am J Sports Med 41(7):1629–1635CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, Taimela S, Hurme M, Nelimarkka O (1993) Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy 9(2):159–163CrossRefPubMed Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, Taimela S, Hurme M, Nelimarkka O (1993) Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy 9(2):159–163CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lafave MR, Hiemstra L, Kerslake S (2016) Factor analysis and item reduction of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII): introduction of BPII 2.0. Am J Sports Med 44(8):2081–2086CrossRefPubMed Lafave MR, Hiemstra L, Kerslake S (2016) Factor analysis and item reduction of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII): introduction of BPII 2.0. Am J Sports Med 44(8):2081–2086CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Liow RY, Walker K, Wajid MA, Bedi G, Lennox CM (2003) Functional rating for knee arthroplasty: comparison of three scoring systems. Orthopedics 26(2):143–149PubMed Liow RY, Walker K, Wajid MA, Bedi G, Lennox CM (2003) Functional rating for knee arthroplasty: comparison of three scoring systems. Orthopedics 26(2):143–149PubMed
9.
go back to reference Mohtadi N (1998) Development and validation of the quality of life outcome measure (questionnaire) for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Sports Med 26(3):350–359CrossRefPubMed Mohtadi N (1998) Development and validation of the quality of life outcome measure (questionnaire) for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Sports Med 26(3):350–359CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Saccomanno MF, Sircana G, Fodale M, Donati F, Milano G (2016) Surgical versus conservative treatment of primary patellar dislocation. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop 40(11):2277–2287CrossRefPubMed Saccomanno MF, Sircana G, Fodale M, Donati F, Milano G (2016) Surgical versus conservative treatment of primary patellar dislocation. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop 40(11):2277–2287CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Smith TO, Donell ST, Clark A et al (2014) The development, validation and internal consistency of the Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) score. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(2):324–335CrossRefPubMed Smith TO, Donell ST, Clark A et al (2014) The development, validation and internal consistency of the Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) score. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(2):324–335CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):34–42CrossRefPubMed Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):34–42CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483CrossRefPubMed Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Successful adaption of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 into German
Authors
Christoph Becher
René Attal
Peter Balcarek
Florian Dirisamer
Michael Liebensteiner
Geert Pagenstert
Philip Schöttle
Gerd Seitlinger
Daniel Wagner
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4673-9

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 9/2018 Go to the issue